All Activity

Not a stupid question. There are lots of people who have to have a lung removed for a list of different reasons (cancer, trauma, infection, birth defects, etc). You can live a semi normal life with one lung. "The average lungs can hold about 6 liters of air. Living with one lung reduces this capacity by about 30 percent. That said, 70 percent functionality is still enough to oxygenate the body properly." https://integrishealth.org/resources/on-your-health/2024/november/can-you-live-with-one-lung

So the legislative branch can give the President a "direct order." How does that work if the house & senate can't agree on the same language in said order. Is it only the Supreme Court that can give direct orders or other lower courts. Does the order have to be written by the Chief Justice or does he/she need to go to the west wing and give a direct verbal order?

Mass illegal immigration is dangerous, unaffordable, and unfair to those who are going through the legal process, as well as those who are being displaced by them in the workforce. Don’t agree with it, change the law. Good luck, the consensus against you is strong.

You aren't addressing my point because you know you can't refute it. The Trump administration is allowed to disagree with a district court decision. They aren't allowed to ignore it. They have to appeal it according to the legal process. So whether you think those court decisions are wrong or not is totally irrelevant. They were ordered by a court to do not do something and they did it anyway. That's illegal (which is why several of those courts are mulling Contempt charges). The Supreme Court has already issued rulings to the Trump administration that they've ignored. There are two cut and dry examples of this in the article. So apparently Trump doesn't always comply with SCOTUS. By your metric, he's officially a King or Dictator.

The B-2 being stealth bombers i'd bet they will go in alone just as in OIF. You don't want more objects to paint on radar. I'd expect the Isreali Air Force will clear things out with F-35 ahead of the B-2s and be close by if needed.

yeah, actually completely on the first three. So your argument is not sustainable. The next three are up to SCOTUS. As I said, if SCOTUS says district judges can do these things, Trump will comply unlike a King or Dictator. if they say district judges can't do this, then Trump comply with SCOTUS, unlike a King or Dictator. Very poor excuse for a rebuttal UB. You need to try harder. Except you can't because you are wrong. mspart

Mass deportations are cruel and inhumane. Also very expensive. I would rather see an Amnesty program similar to 1986.

The Judiciary and Legislative branches. Quick tip: google "checks and balances." I live in the US. I'm starting doubt you do though, considering you seem to think the President can't be ordered to do anything.

Since it’s illegal for an illegal to possess a firearm there’s not much chance anyone will be shot by an illegal, right? The dress of law enforcement is a reaction to the interference and lack of cooperation by local law enforcement authorities. The riots were instigated when it falsely went out on the grapevine that ICE was making a raid on illegals. It was actually a different agency enforcing a search warrant. The only illegal activity was the riots and the interference.

His royal highness. He’s a king remember.

Based on our Constitution who is able to give the POTUS a direct order? I'll ask again, do you live in the USA?

Hand he's right at the center of political thought. Just ask, he'll tell you. mspart

Yep, count 1 is not fulfilled yet. Count 2, Gaza war is worse than ever? Not even. That is a stretch to defy rational thought. Count 3 Trump negotiated and gave Iran 60 days. No deal at the end of 60 days. Israel bombs them the day after. Again, this source of yours is willfully wrong, trying to tell lies that are not true but if told enough, people will believe. Who's tactic is that? mspart

Vak came back a new man.

The Great and Powerful Don will announce this very real deal concurrently with his soon-to-be announced 90 trade deals in 90 days! Victory! Hail to the Chief!

Again, you are speaking of district court judges moving out of their lane and going national. There is a reason they are district courts, because they serve the district, not the nation. Therefore that would be an unlawful order to follow until further appeal clarifies the situation. Trump complied with the Abrego decision and Abrego is back, but tied up with federal charges. So you are wrong. Trump sent people to El Salvador. The district judge said you can't do that and bring them back. It was too late for that. But have any illegals since gone to El Salvador? NO. Those are just two of your 0 for 6. mspart

LOL. He needs to consult with Netanyahoo, his boss, before he makes such a decision.

Remarkably quick to catch on to the joke for your standards. Proud of you!

Address this: "And even then, they've disobeyed direct orders. That's incontrovertible. If they disagree with the orders, they can go through the proper legal process to dispute that. They aren't allowed to just ignore them and proceed. That's a radical departure from civil norms that directly challenges the constitution."

I would have said, I don't agree with this you jerkface of a troll, piece of anchovie pizza, woman beater. Cav, you are a much better man than I. mspart

I know you are but what am I

Right back at ya

That's a fantastic personal standard for yourself, and one I whole-heartedly share. However, riots are a fact of life. We know what causes them. You can address them in two ways. Either by overwhelming force (what we usually do) or by addressing the root cause.

Go back and look. mspart