Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. You, four hours ago: "There is 100% a need for both the house and the senate. The senate (DEI) is balanced by the house (not DEI). It’s not that hard to see that the founding fathers were smart enough to prevent either side from taking control."
  3. Your video “clip” with little skippy in it trying to get an ha moment failed miserably.
  4. No but all the freeloading wokesters there were
  5. I don't know if anyone else saw this, but that was embarrassing to watch. I didn't see the whole thing, saw some clips of it, but the gist of his nearly hour long rambling was he's smarter and knows better than everyone else. But doesn't offer any solutions to anything. Most heads of state keep it to around 20 minutes. There's exceptions, like Castro who spoke for 5 hours once. This just made him look even more boneheaded than he already was and was pretty embarrassing for all of us.
  6. You can't keep anything straight lol Were you drinking at the homeless shelter?
  7. Carl recruited over DT when he brought in Cyler Sanderson. Time is a flat circle.
  8. Except for the Senate as you claimed earlier in the thread.
  9. Ugh...regardless of what side of the isle, this has to stop...we need ALL of our leaders of this country to get unified on a single message about political violence....yes I know it won't happen but something has to change.
  10. Nothing gets past you, genius.
  11. I was here along time ago Good to know DEI isnt needed anywhere in our nation then.
  12. I already said that. Try to keep up with the conversation if you're going to jump in.
  13. So you oppose DEI. Got it.
  14. Our non resident unlawful slip n tweet is in the house. Bahahahahahahha. Here kitty kitty
  15. According to you he’s actually defending DEI by defending the senate right?
  16. Thanks for contributing to the conversation
  17. How do you know any of what you just said about these HUMAN BEINGS???
  18. Poor little Jimmy, it's like anything he says could be on any thread. It wouldn't matter. He still wouldn't make any sense.
  19. That’s not DEI though hypocrite
  20. Which is why in the house California has way more reps than Wyoming.
  21. If you’re for DEI why aren’t you for the senate and house both having equal representation????? Shouldn’t it be two for each state in both the house and the senate then?
  22. So should antifa be labeled a terrorist organization or not??
  23. Lmao you picked the word I didn't bold. I was referring to "large" and "small" which would a statistical characteristic that can be used to categorize states within the overall US population. Population size is a demographic feature. Is distinguishing between large and small state populations a demographic distinction? ChatGPT said: Yes — but with a nuance. If you’re distinguishing U.S. states by the size of their populations, you are making a demographic distinction, because population size is a demographic characteristic. For example, comparing California (large population) and Wyoming (small population) is a demographic comparison.
  24. Nothing to do with presidential politics? Go ahead and back that up. Disingenuous? Hardly. If you hold all to the same standard this is hardly even a blip. Because, as I stated before, it is true. I think you just don’t like that it was and want to reframe it to deny it because of your again arbitrary criteria.
  25. Are you saying Klarman is less partisan than Turley? I don't think so based on his performance in this debate calling Trump a fascist etc etc. Turley is/was a Democrat. But I think he is quite moderate and is disquieted by the extreme leftists policies now coming out in the name of the Democratic Party. Read the article and see if you agree or disagree with his position. Read his article and see who spoke more by fact than not. The fact Klarman said he was speaking from facts that anyone could fact check and then said that violent insurrectionists on Jan 6 resulted in the deaths of officers was as much a fabrication as anything. He lost his position of fact and truth teller with that first position. I find Turely as well reasoned when he is discussing legal or constitutional matters. You can disagree but only after you read what he writes. I gave the link. He has various articles there everyday. Each day brings a new one or two. You can read and decide. mspart
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...