Hammerlock3

your claim is that 100% of them would against it, and all for reasons related to ignorance and prejudice? I dont think thats what you are saying but im using the question as an example of why i dont think your opinion is nuanced enough.

ostensibly because we are on a short road to theocracy...in reality because it's seen as a political statement(like 'pride' flags, BLM etc)

term limits are a problem rooted in incentive structure. "its good to be the king"

I think the DNC has a first mover problem, they all want him out but no one wants to be the person who ousted him in favor of someone who is gonna lose anyway.

sense i assume it wasn't in confidence, this is what @three_arrows just sent me privately. "I'd be glad to keep knocking your dick in the dirt. But, unfortunately, I've made it to the end of the amount of posts I have for a single day on this most august site. It seems I may have wasted them on blithering ***I am an idiot and can't use a better adjective***s, unfortunately. I look forward to, literally, smacking the shit out of your mouth in the very near future, pussycake. I don't live on the site, my kids and my spouse love me and I'm living an actual life. So it likely won't be tomorrow, but who knows. It could be in a week, or in 3 weeks, or maybe just next week. Maybe even tomorrow. But rest assured, young lady. I'll be back to blister your capitalist bootlicking ass. Soon. "

you could have left out the last sentence and the implication would have been clear.

you give the impression of someone who doesn't know they are pontificating to an empty congregation.

...would you take it to me that your response struck me as rather bizarre.

why are all your post bombastic, simplistic and void of any nuance?

I'm not crazy about this precedent either, however I think its a response to all the BLM and Trans flag stuff thats funneled into classrooms...but beyond that, I think your choice to ground the argument on this issue, in light of the major issues facing the country, undermines your argument in the context of the whole topic.

this is where the conversation stops cause i think pretty much everything you said is false or predicated on economic ignorance.

attention hungry texan with conservative sensibilities and a personality gap to fill? Sounds like a beto guy to me!

...but we haven't definitively figured out if Bo is a trumper!!!!! Who can sleep under such conditions!

hey by then they're too old(woods, truax)! Gotta steal em young

it seems like the more money you put into portal guys, the less goes to actual recruit, and the more tempting it is rely on the portal. Plus who wants to recruit highschoolers when you can get guys you know can handle college

trumps were as cringy as KJP, until the last one, the blonde who would just whatabout everyone to death. "The president cheated on his wife" "so did clinton next question" its a dirty job but i think thats the best way to do it.

in other countries its way more acceptable to harass the leaders and they are expected to be tough enough to take it. we've kind of devolved into thinking of the president as king, so of course they can trot out their whipping boy to lie on their behalf.

has anyone brought up the idea that anyone who claims climate change is a matter of international urgency and doesn't support nuclear power is a transparent fraud.

PS- I can put it this way, the left has no ability to police itself, they're continually trying to outflank each other to the left and haven't established what "too far" is.

As we all know the left is in turmoil because they can't find a decent candidate to run against Trump, who is a pretty absurd figure. Why can't they? 1) All the momentum within the democratic party is on the extreme, economically moronic, oppressor/oppressed narrative is everything, utopian Marxist end. Any who catches that lightening is going to be DOA. No moderates allowed. 2) Because they are so far down the utopian rabbit hole, the democratic party hasn't elevated anyone who isn't willing to pass counterfactual purity tests to the point where they look like complete imbeciles. Why was the incompetent and ridiculous Kamala made VP? Because she's dumb enough to parrot anything. This is virtue in the democratic party. The right isn't much better, it has a significant problem with caring more about "owning the libs" than about actual policy, but its clear which side is more radicalized and potentially harmful.

hopefully his coaching is better than his acting.

here is a cliche for your, "style over substance"

i'm just encouraged they changed the narrative at all. i thought cnn was gonna say biden won.

if that was true and philadelphia inquirer was the thought leader for a political movement you would have a point (but on not planet is this funny)

yeah but can scott switch his accent back? goodell has a really raspy voice thats gonna be hard to imitate.