i looked it up, matt andersons bmi was 14.8 less than 18.5 is underweighted, the deviation between overweight underweight, and obese is basically 6. So thats basically two points away from making a whole new category.
sorry that was a bit of an aside. In my opinion it would make the team race a lot better. It would give a boost to balanced teams as opposed to half your lineup scoring all of your points which is currently how certain people are winning. It would also increase the importance of bonus points.
I smell major for ragusin, and despite the fact that Griffith has not looked good at all, he knows how to win in a way kennedy hasn't shown consistently.
you're wrong. Rankings reflect previous results, we don't want every ranker to take on the Flo model and sprint with whoever is trendy or has a mullet. He'll be up there before too long, and he'll be very durable in the rankings after that.
yeah i'm at home with it just being the illusion of order. What do you think I thought, Lee was behind the scenes maintaining order with mobster like coercion.
you gotta give Lee credit, what we thought was the most stable weight was actually the most chaotic, but Lee imposed so much order on it we had no idea.
I can hear Pyles now, "OMG the enigmatic Nick Suriano subverts our expectations again! You see typically, wrestlers wrestle, Suriano is a wrestler, but he doesn't wrestle....see it's ironic."