WrestlingRasta

These guys are so serious about the importance of Hunter Biden that Comer, who didn’t bother to take the time to show up for the Archer interview then went on TV and lied about what he said….has now gone on TV to cry about the media is not paying enough attention to it. I wonder why??? (Hint: because they’re not serious people) MAGA!!

During his arraignment Trump was told as condition of his release he was not to “attempt to influence or intimidate witnesses, retaliate against anyone, or in any other way attempt to obstruct the administration of justice.” Violation could result in incarceration until trial 24 hours later….

My apologies. You’ll never hear that from me again.

Unfortunately technology has proven that old adage that ignorance is a result of lack of access to information…..not entirely true.

I didn’t say he was your candidate. I said ‘your boy’

Helps me…..how?

Or that cool chick from Colorado…

You should probably ask your boy on that one….

Are you referring to your post in the thread specifically about trump, at a time when MAGA is crying about two tiers for Trump….or another post??

I do have to say, I completely agree with the two tiers of justice argument. 100% Beyond the obvious current example, let’s look at a list of people who have been defendants against 42 felonies regarding classified documents, military plans, and overturning elections, in two different jurisdictions, and were released free of bail. They are: . . . Additionally, let’s look at the upcoming hearing dates for the Senate Judiciary Committee to investigate Jared Kushner, former administration official, and his 2 billion dollar deal with the Saudi right after leaving office. Those dates are: . . . Mark you calendars! MAGA!!

Starting Monday, the street running in front of the Fulton County courthouse (GA) will be shut down for two weeks. Barricades and other security measures are in place. Two weeks. That sounds like a little more going on than processing just one man. If they are preparing for this big of a reaction...........hmmmmmm.

I assume that question was for me, and if so first I have to ask you to redirect me to where I said ‘I know trump is guilty and I know Biden is innocent” (In fact I’m pretty sure I wrote the statement ‘I believe Biden is guilty of…’)

First- I never shared the opinion that he should go to prison because he lied, so there’s that. And neither is this indictment. In fact, it starts out making that point very clear, so there’s that too. Second- number one you don’t know how much I know about the law. I’m not saying I know a lot, or know a little….but to say your friend knows more than you and I combined…..how can you possibly know that? (This lends to my opinion that people will come up with ‘facts’ they know nothing about to try and sell their point) You can’t know that, yet you say it so matter of factly. But moving on…..what the charges are and what the evidence is, is not a matter of opinion. Sure, everyone can have an opinion on how strong the evidence is, how strong the testimony is, etc etc. But what the actual charges are, is not a matter of opinion. Again, it’s kind of like me saying “it’s my opinion rain water is not liquid”. Well, okay. Me stating that then automatically makes it a valid opinion? No, of course not. And no matter what anyone will admit, these charges are not for thoughts and words, but for actions. The lying part comes in to show the motivation for his actions. Do I believe Trump would have still faced charges had he went away and not run for president, yes I do. Because I believe the purpose of this is to make sure it never happens again. And finally as for Biden/Trump. A few things. 1) unlike many….I don’t automatically relate Biden and trump together whenever the topic of one of them comes up. Each are their own individuals. Each of their ‘cases’ are individual cases. I’ve paid close attention to both. In the case of Trump, I’ve seen strong evidence, and I think it’s important to note I don’t count media influencers commentary as evidence. And with trump, a lot of that evidence and testimony comes from his inner circle, not from people hell bent on bringing him down. Some even his own words (keep an Eye out for dissemination case coming out of NJ) With Biden, I’ve seen a lot of smoke, but that smoke is coming from people who are hell bent on bringing down. And when it comes time to present actual real hard evidence….well….we have seen a developing pattern here. I definitely think Biden is guilty of some scrupulous activity. Do I believe it is anything more than the standard M.O. from DC? At this point it doesn’t appear so. Do I think the allegations against Biden are as dangerous to our country as the allegations against Trump…..not even close.

The Supreme Court thing yeah

Trump is calling on the supreme court to halt all of his cases because he is having to spend money on his defenses that should be going to campaigning. He has also filed a motion in his case with Cohen that Cohen should not be able to use evidence in that trial that may incriminate him in his criminal trials. But, this guy doesn't have an authoritative mentality at all.

Which brings up a good point. And I'm just looking for clarification here.......If Trump is being the most persecuted president ever because he is being indicted for his free speech, how is Biden the most corrupt president ever for saying hi on the phone? I don't really have an opinion one way or the other, I'm just trying to square the two.

It’s insane. She has to go.

Even though you think I’m stupid because of this weird concept that actually reading the document would be a good way to form an opinion on it, I’m going to ask again anyway….you still haven’t read it yet, have you? Because if you had it would be very clear to you that the charges are nothing about inciting the rioters to storm the Capitol. The charges are about his actions, not just on the state on Jan6, but in the months leading up to it. We all know the other presidents lied. We all know Trump was attacked a lot. Neither has anything to do with this case what so ever. But those of us that understand that will just go back to being stupid now.

Confirmation bias is a powerful thing. Why should I put effort and go seek out the actual information on my own, when I know there’s a safe space right over here where they will tell me exactly what I want to hear about it. It’s become even more powerful in the app age, and there are people who make millions off of it.

Because you’re too busy going to see what other people are telling you to think about it, then coming to places like here and arguing what other people are telling you to think about it, from a stance that ‘I am right and any other thought is just stupid’. God forbid you actually read the thing you are arguing, to see if you might have your own opinion about it. Honestly I didn’t read the rest of your message after that, it’s telling enough. Lawyers lie, political lawyers lie (and here’s a surprise, it’s not only those on the left). Political lawyers who lied about a particular election…may….juuuuust may….focus on an aspect he deems favorable for the person he was lying for, even if that aspect has nothing to do with the charges laid out, but will play loudly with those who are too busy waiting to be told what to think to bother going to read it for themselves.

I think I covered what you’re getting at in the paragraph above that question. And yes, when you admittingly haven’t read it but instead are arguing what someone else told you to think about it, it changes my perspective when listening to you.

In that statement by Turley, why does he not speak to the actions by Trump, and not the speech, from Nov-Jan? Why does he emphasize the free speech ‘aspect’, when the charges and supporting evidence are for actions? And I’ll ask again, did you read all of the indictment?

He is a known Constitutional attorney, also a known strong partisan. He helped push the rigged voting machines stuff.

I’ve read a lot of stuff of and about Prouty, interesting as hell. Had the pleasure of meeting Robert Groden in Dallas during the ‘00 trials. Interesting cat

Didn’t bother to read the indictment at all either did you?