Jump to content

Caveira

Members
  • Posts

    1,850
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Everything posted by Caveira

  1. Is anything happening in the fix Ragusin match.
  2. Nagao down 7-1 too in the second getting ridden like a pony
  3. Didn’t seem that way. But I’m watching a few marches at once lol
  4. Challenges take forever wait now I like them lol
  5. Psu gets to throw bricks and get them back. It’s like a boomerang lol.
  6. I don’t think they will make it. But whoever does ….. big * IMO due to NF and 3 pt takedown scoring changes.
  7. This weight got re drawn cause someone is out. Woods now wrestles someone he teched
  8. Wasn’t tj a 2x juco champ? 98-1 1,3 (I think). Highest winning % ever at Iowa.
  9. We don’t call stalling enough! (Some people) how dare they call stalling to end the match! (Other people) this is why we keep changing the rules to make things more and more complicated……
  10. We were told by the psu faithful Cael wanted to give him a win at rec hall.
  11. But does he have losses to 1) Andrew sparks the 9 seed in the bigs and 2) baumann the 10 seed at bigs? good news is he has a rematch with sparks in round 1 to see if he can avenge that loss.
  12. We may be. And that’s fair. No worries portaJ….
  13. 58 rando people in this thread ? Edit: I didn’t count the Randos
  14. Have him wrestle more matches during the regular season than one other person in his bracket. Maybe he’ll have a winning % that compares with people that wrestled conference. Other than that go back to seeding committee that we had prior to this. (That was better imo) Even Carter tweeted he will beat everyone …. bla bla seed doesn’t matter.
  15. Someone gets farked no matter what if he is healthy. I don’t necessarily like him but healthy him beats everyone. You can’t try to make conference matter and let people skip it and not get punished. This can be debated to eternity. how many psu fans bagged on tnt when 133 submitted late. Rules are rules. They knew wrestling the literal least amount of matches in the bracket ruined their winning %. They knew defaulting twice at conference wrecked that % and ruined their conf finish. They literally scoffed at two of three seeding rules and people are now waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. Definition of insanity lol. we had a human seeding committee not to long ago. People whined so much that sometimes these humans made incorrect decisions and convinced the ncaa to implement a formula. Now we have a formula. We’re like literally our worst enemy with constant complaining to change the rules super frequently. From the stalling legislation crowd …. To the push out I want freestyle crowd….. to the fix all the qualifier crowd. Seeding sucks crowd etc…… This paragraph wasn’t a reference to you sir John…..
  16. Did he place ahead of anyone seeded above him at conference? With two losses……. Does he have more matches than “ANYONE” in his bracket? How does two losses and the fewest matches in your bracket impact winning %.
  17. He stepped on mat. And didn’t wrestle. It’s legally a loss. He lost. It is what it is. It’s semantics yes. But it’s life.
  18. He literally. Actually did. Did he not?
  19. More peds for fix
  20. Prolly why he took those PEDs.
  21. What is the point? Someone said or looked empty and made reference to lost potential revenue. You said it was over 11 or 12k. It was 33% empty. Other teams average more for duals than they mustered for the finals of the big 10s.
×
×
  • Create New...