Jump to content

Caveira

Members
  • Posts

    6,345
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

Everything posted by Caveira

  1. It’s almost like you had a new argument : idea.
  2. We should just pay for everything for them…. Until the country is bankrupt. That’s the ticket.
  3. Our lefties on this board hiding like the media wh$ore lefties. Where you at resident lefties?
  4. He is right here. The media … no one on the left criticized the political witch hunt of running on the premise to get Trump. Sure he’s a wh$re now… but he’s right.
  5. Essentially saying Bragg/Leticia James should not have run in I’m gonna get Trump…. And it was wrong for the media to “tolerate” it. @VakAttack looking for a lawyers take on this. https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8MUvoQ9/ transcript: 00:00:01 --> 00:00:03 Did Democrats just surrender? 00:00:03 --> 00:00:06 Tapper's even saying we were right about Lawfare. 00:00:07 --> 00:00:11 I think it is problematic when people run for prosecutor 00:00:11 --> 00:00:15 and promise to go after a specific politician. 00:00:15 --> 00:00:17 And both Leticia James, attorney general of New York, 00:00:17 --> 00:00:19 and Alvin Bragg, the district attorney, New York, 00:00:19 --> 00:00:22 both of them did that. And that, 00:00:22 --> 00:00:23 to me, 00:00:24 --> 00:00:28 is problematic, because you're not saying, um, 00:00:28 --> 00:00:34 this is the offense, and we need to bring justice to this perpetrator. 00:00:34 --> 00:00:35 You're saying, I'm gonna go after him. 00:00:36 --> 00:00:40 And I think that there was a degree to which that was tolerated 00:00:40 --> 00:00:43 by the media at large. I'm glad he's saying it, 00:00:43 --> 00:00:46 but why didn't he say it on his show? 00:00:46 --> 00:00:47 The guy was on the air for, what, 00:00:47 --> 00:00:50 two hours a day? C N N. 00:00:50 --> 00:00:51 Called it the trial of the century. 00:00:52 --> 00:00:53 Now tappers saying, yeah, 00:00:53 --> 00:00:56 it was all cooked up by Tish and Fat Alvin. 00:00:56 --> 00:00:58 It's not like this was even covered up. 00:00:58 --> 00:01:00 There was tape of Tish and Bragg saying it.
  6. If other Muslim countries cared about Palestinians. Would they let them into their country as refugees? I have no idea. But why do all the Muslim countries around Palestine not accept Palestinian refugees?
  7. Explain. Option a) genocide: If they’re all dead…. option b) birthing tons of future terrorists…..
  8. No. I’m doing what y’all do. Twisting words Either they’re killing everyone and they will not be birthing future terrorists…. Well because. Or they’re birthing tons of future terrorists. you really can’t have both.
  9. #1. We’re not killing anyone. Point of clarification there. second. Are they committing genocide? If so they’re killing way more terrorists than future ones that can be born. I mean. Work on your terms. Or math. if it’s not genocide. Are they just letting Hamas sit back and procreate little future terror babies. Which is it ? given they (Hamas) want to kill all the Jews and remove them from earth…. Which strategy is better for Israel?
  10. some “men” are nothing but racist sore losers. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1243637514404795&id=100062756751583&set=a.621072699994616 Brittney Griner appears to hurl racist slur, F-bomb at Caitlin Clark; fans demand WNBA investigation Note He identifies as a as a man …. So he’s a man.
  11. The Palestinian authority supports terrorism. They pay approx 300 million dollars a year to terrorist families that have attacked Israel. This accounts for almost 10% of their total budget. This is sometimes referred to as the “pay for slay” program. Wonder how much food, medical, or schooling could be improved without paying terrorists….. The PA's educational curricula have been criticized for content that glorifies martyrdom and demonizes Israel. PA officials have made public statements that glorify individuals who have committed attacks against Israelis. the PA provides stipends to families of Palestinians who died during attacks on Israelis. The PA has names streets, schools, and public squares after individuals who have carried out attacks against Israelis.
  12. Your comment is fair. They like to ignore more than 90% voted for terrorists initially too. They won’t comment on the human shield issues. The shooting rockets behind hospitals / schools etc.
  13. But. 90.13% of the votes were for terrorist orgs. Hamas. The plfp. And Al-Aqsa Martyrs'. resident lefties forget this. Hamas also won the popular vote by a landslide.
  14. The resident Hamas supporters will never acknowledge the human shield part of Hamas plan. This comment will be 100% ignored only to bring up some same point they’ve brought up a zillion times.
  15. You’re one of the only pro antifa guys on here. Often people wonder if it’s them against everyone if their position is wrong. Maybe ponder that.
  16. 50% voted for Hamas in that election. 40 for the other terror group. 90+% for terror groups
  17. Wrong. I posted stats in the last thread
  18. Taco from the league is great.
  19. Who were his advisors then? Surely okst or nlwc or psu have people who help with this crap. I don’t believe that’s plausible unless he 100% hid whatever his intentions were (steroids retirement whatever) and didn’t ask anyone for advice. Or he got shyte advice. Shyte or no advice? Maybe porta or the other psu apologists know?
  20. If Gilman truly dgaf. I guess that’s possible but who was advising him? You can possibly forfeit your ability to compete which is very reasonable given his age…. Or…. Who cares retire……. Or….. just hide from the testing and potentially forfeit your ability to make a financial living via coaching etc…. sometimes what is real is what is most plausible. if “hopped up on steroids” and old. Just retire. if “not hopped up on steroids”…. Just test. if I still wanna compete but I don’t wanna test…. Who knows. else. What a mystery.
  21. what if said ncaa institution is ethical? It may be why he went from idgaf to appealing no? Weren’t you one of the idgaf psu fans earlier in this thread ? A suspension from the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) for drug test-related violations primarily affects your eligibility as an athlete. However, transitioning to a coaching role, such as coaching NCAA wrestling, involves additional considerations:U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (USADA)+2SwimSwam+2U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (USADA)+2 NCAA Regulations: Coaching Eligibility: The NCAA enforces strict standards of ethical conduct for coaches. Violations, particularly those involving ethical breaches or misconduct, can lead to disciplinary actions, including suspensions or show-cause penalties. A show-cause penalty requires any NCAA institution hiring the penalized coach to demonstrate why they should not face sanctions for employing that individual. This often deters institutions from hiring coaches with such penalties. NCAA+1Wikipedia+1Wikipedia+1Wikipedia+1 Impact of USADA Sanctions: While a USADA suspension directly impacts athletic participation, it can also raise concerns about a coach's commitment to fair play and adherence to anti-doping regulations. NCAA institutions may consider these factors when evaluating potential coaching candidates. Case Studies: Donnie Tyndall: The former head basketball coach received a 10-year show-cause penalty from the NCAA for violations related to academic fraud and financial misconduct. This penalty effectively barred him from coaching at the collegiate level during its duration. Wikipedia+2Wikipedia+2Wikipedia+2Wikipedia Brad Bohannon: The former Alabama baseball coach was issued a 15-year show-cause penalty by the NCAA due to involvement in gambling activities and non-cooperation with investigations. This severe penalty underscores the NCAA's stringent stance on ethical violations. Wikipedia+2Wikipedia+2Wikipedia+2Wikipedia Conclusion: While a USADA suspension does not automatically disqualify you from coaching NCAA wrestling, it can significantly impact your employability. NCAA institutions prioritize ethical conduct and adherence to regulations; thus, a history of anti-doping violations may be viewed unfavorably during the hiring process. It's essential to demonstrate a commitment to integrity and compliance with all relevant policies to enhance your prospects in securing a coaching position.
  22. He retired? He now gives a rip apparently. Hopefully not a rip on a bong ha
×
×
  • Create New...