That much is correct. The point is some are saying they were going to release it; some are saying they were going to vote to release it; when the accurate statement is they were going to vote on whether to release it.
The fact that the DoJ didn’t charge him is significant because there is enough hostility between them that they would gladly take him down if they could. And if the House investigators had found evidence of a crime they would find a way to get it to the DoJ, one way or another.
All that leaves is a report of innuendo, rumor, and undesirable habits. Nothing to indicate he would be less suitable than Garland.