red viking

Good article. Doesn't refute anything I said, such as who wins trade war. It even says "its more likely that we move to a world of multiple trading currencies." This diminishes the value of the dollar and the dollar would no longer be THE reserve currency of the world.

He's a brutal dictator with over the top punishments for anybody that doesn't toe the line. Yah, N. Korea has a low crime rate too.

That's great (seriously) but most wingers don't. Are you a winger btw?

The hypocrisy of the right is funny. They constantly whine about universities being liberal but NEVER complain about (tax exempt) churches being winger.

Doesn't refute my claim that US can't single handedly beat China in a trade war. In fact it doesn't appear to discuss the trade war at all. Looks like another strawman by you.

LIke I said, I couldn't read it anyway. Like I'm gonna buy a subscription just to read his article? LMAO.

I can't even read the article. Don't have a subscription. I see it discusses low domestic demand. That's long been acknowledged as one of China's biggest problems but nothing that is going to lose the trade war for them when the U.S. is the only country blocking their imports. They export all over the world, so while it hurts them, it won't come close to breaking them. All they have to do is hold out until Trump is out of office, which is Jan 2029 at the latest but he'll run into big problems starting In Jan 2027.

I don't have a subscription to that non-reliable News source. Show me something objective.

Yup. Good analogy. Tax USAW because their membership doesn't happen to vote 50/50 in elections.

You ever been to the southern party of the country? Some extremely wealthy churches down there. Much more than in the north.

Depends how you define it. They certainly fall into the category of having very cheap labor. That being said, many economists have already claimed that they have already passed their prime of being able to manufacture cheap, very basic products that are labor intensive and that a higher percentage of this production is shifting to countries with lower labor rates.

why don't you tell me who the specific students were that actually damaged the building or "took it over" and what does a "takeover" entail?

Are you on drugs? Man-made global warming has been proven beyond any reasonable doubt. This link that you provided doesn't even bring that into question. All it does is indicate that there were some internal disagreements regarding the methods of a particular study and that study didn't attempt to refute the existence of man-made global warming either. This is the type of outrageous stuff that the wingers do. They find a specific very small area where there is some disagreement between scientists and then extrapolate that to point out that everything associated with the much bigger picture of the phenomenon must be a big sham. It's unreal how scientifically illiterate some people are.

We've already lost the manufacturing jobs due to cheaper labor in other countries. It's not coming back to any significant extent. I can 100% guarantee that, unless we become a 3rd world country ourselves.

Yah, if somebody vandalized property, made significant threats, etc.

both sides will actually lose, but we may lose more. We certainly can't win. China is playing the long game, like always, and thinking 10 steps ahead and 50 years down the road. Trump changes his mind on a daily basis and relies upon his "instinct" as he even admitted. It's actually extremely sad and pathetic.

If they knew who did it, I'm sure there were disciplinary actions taken.

The school supported or endorsed those actions?

Like allowing students to protest? WTF are you talking about?

Show me this "non looney" article you are talking about.

So if the "vast majority" of the faculty in one part of the college vote a certain way then federal funding should be withheld?

So the Democratic "narrative" is typically the dominant one is the explanation. I know your explanation for that is that everybody is ganging up on the Republicans. Another explanation is that the Democratic narrative is simply more accurate most of the time., so most of the mainstream media and institutions trust it more That goes along with the study that I provided.

How is climate science rigged? You denying anthropogenic global warming?

Find something more reliable then.

Harvard is not a "political institution." Simply because most of the people there lean left. They aren't exactly in the middle? Wow, now that isn't a slippery slope, is it?