Wrestleknownothing

The weights over time play out like this:

And there are other 118s on the lis in spite of what @jerseywrestling said.

Are you suggesting they recruit an active starter off another team's roster after the start of the season?

It has almost all weights under 141: 118, 121, 123, 125, 126, 133, 134. And maybe that is all.

That one was a screenshot in an article, but hear is Max Dean scooping Jacob Warner's ankle then reaching back for the bow

Starts with scooping the ankle. And brings me great joy.

Weight class across eras are tough. He has guys on this list who wrestled when there were 7, 8, and 10 weight class and he does not adjust for when weights were increased across the board. Guerrero was 126 which became 133. Some of the guys on this list wrestled at the lowest weight class of their era and some at the second lowest. There appears to just be rounding going on here. But what I find truly odd is that guys who won 100% of the time are tied for 8th (Ed Peery, Joe McDaniel, Mike Caruso, Ross Flood).

One does not get tuckered, one gets plumb tuckered out.

I will guess yes since they are wrestling attached for those five dates.

The Curse of Dan?

Is that the record for fastest ban?

The NCAA has only had an interest in the separation of college athletes from professional to the extent that it allows them to monetize the college athlete. Central to the monetization is exemption from anti-trust laws. As they have been threatened with the lose of anti-trust protection and have lost multiple related cases up to the Supreme Court level, their ability to separate and monetize has waned.

I think its just mayo and ketchup with a little diced pickle.

83%

We may need to get a room, but ditto.

You get me.

I didn't want to disappoint you, so I went with Red Breast Single Pot Still 12 year.

Alternative theory: the best want to be with the best. Best coaches, best training partners, best RTC. It becomes a virtuous cycle.

As long as I have my whiskey tonight, I may only want dry toast in the morning.

I have been debating with myself who he is. He said something in one of his very first posts that gave away he had been around for a long time under a different name. Early on I was leaning Dan, but he hasn't been incoherent enough for that.

As multi-time champs you have to put RBY, Starocci, and Brooks at least on par with O'Toole if not ahead.

I assume we collectively think Yianni is stiil the favorite to win 149 and complete the quad. Prior to this match I would have said 95% sure he wins. If I said 75% after losing to Gomez in the fashion he did, would you say that I am pessimistic or optimistic?

My first thought too.

I know the statute of limitations is up on renaming the thread, but shouldn't it be just Gomez highlights?