PortaJohn

Good point. I choose neutral

Attaching a link to one of, if not, the greatest documentaries ever made on corruption in politics. Had reservations about posting this because I'm concerned that for those who may watch it will turn into another Dems vs Rep debate. This documentary is not about that. Philadelphia was corrupt way back when the Republicans ran it up until the mid 20th century and stayed corrupted after the Dems took over. Why this documentary is so important is it shines light on political tribalism and it's dangers. Political tribalism can take on many forms. In this case, the Mayor Street vs Sam Katz election, it takes on the form of race. The tragedy is the African American community reelected a mayor who was the puppet for certain Unions that had no interest or care for them. On a side note. I believe that being non partisan takes courage. I've come to enjoy the spirited debates on this forum but all too often I've seen the dangers (on a micro level) of political tribalism that is displayed on many of the topics discussed on here. It's important that we debate and disagree but it's also just as important to be self aware/reflective and consider that we may be wrong. Cheers

@Husker_Du CHS's are not FBI agents but I didn't participate in any of the J6 threads so I do not know what your stance was

100%...Countless studies done on this very subject and it's surprising how so many people do not have the self awareness that you do

You're just going to have to take the L on this one. I've read through your arguments and you haven't presented anything that is factually based on the information that has been released to the public thus far

Yes, way too early because I also think Feldman will sneak in a victory over Kerk before NCAA's. I think Kerk places higher come March but Feldman has the recipe to get one over him

Yes, he will 100% not beat Steveson

He will not with one loss to Steveson barring a major or tech fall loss

I'm talking about 1 loss Kerk

Emphasis on TWO with one being to Ramirez. Had he only had one loss to KOT at Big 12s then he gets the #2 seed.

Last year O'Toole and Mesenbrink were the undefeated wrestlers. Carr came in with 2 losses & got penalized with the #4 seed because of his loss to Ramirez

O'Toole was the #1 seed

Kerk will be ranked 2 all year. Steveson will be #1. They wont penalize Kerk for the loss especially considering who he lost to and he's the returning champ. That's how they seed. If they tell the public they are seeding using any other criteria then they are lying

I repeat. A one loss Kerk (to Steveson in the b10 finals) will not be seeded behind Henrickson at NCAA's

Nope Kerk wont get the 2 seed with one loss to Steveson? If you believe this then pass me the drugs you're on

No, Kerk will be the 2 seed if he goes into NCAA's with one loss to Steveson

Scrolled through and cant find where you posted his twitter account but I'd be surprised if it hasn't been taken down yet

I believe the photos were taken on different days.

I think it's important you post your findings showing that he is not the shooter or clarify that at this point you have a hunch.

Makes sense that the Golden Arches play host to the completion of this epic story. Within this year we've confirmed Kamala, Trump, and now Luigi Mangione. Who is the 4th? How does this play out?

Both you and RV can be correct on this particular subject.

@mspart this is correct.

Usually that equates to a Trustafarian...Did his bio include glass blowing entrepreneur

Haven't seen it. Did he bring the mouthful of gum to the interview or did the interviewer approach him post gum installment?