PortaJohn

I dont know why this has become such a common theme. PSU is better than Notre Dame in most positions if not equal too. Maybe ND is a better in the secondary but it's not like their QB is a stud and the PSU secondary (which is elite) will get torched

I'm all for voter id and support it but Trip does have a legitimate point this time. There was a dispute in North Dakota a few years ago on this very issue. Thankfully it was resolved.

Di Shu Ya Gongfu (Chinese: 地鼠牙功夫, literally "Gopher Teeth Kung Fu", originally named "Big Gopher" (Chinese: 大地鼠, Dàdì shǔ) is a Chinese martial art that has its origins in Hoy Hong Temple out of Gopher techniques of Five Animal Kung Fu, Ng Ying Kungfu (Chinese: 五形功夫).[3] The system "was modeled after the demeanor and fighting strategy of an attacking gopher. Techniques unique to Di Shu Ya are ripping, hooking, clawing and grasping applications."

Do Gophers wrestle like Heavyweights or do Heavyweights wrestle like Gophers?

He is confirmed dead. They have his manifesto & letters. It included these statements: -he needed to “cleanse” his mind “of the brothers I’ve lost and relieve myself of the burden of the lives I took.” -“This was not a terrorist attack, it was a wakeup call. Americans only pay attention to spectacles and violence. What better way to get my point across than a stunt with fireworks and explosives,”

Both Penn State & Texas would've been in. PSU finished 4th in the last CFP Rankings & Texas 3rd

FAMOUS QUOTES: "Wait... what is a primary?"

What I've found that has been corroborated but as we know information can change -Matthew Alan Livelsberger -Active Duty (Special Forces-Green Beret) -Went to Fort Bragg and deployed to Afghanistan 2009 ***Both he and the New Orleans suspect went to Fort Bragg and were in Afghanistan at the same time but at this point there is no confirmed link to each other in planning these attacks** -arrived to the hotel, drove off, and returned -sustained Head shot prior to detonation -Saw the claims that the cybertruck was programmed to self drive but as of yet haven't seen anywhere where that has been officially confirmed -They also announced at this time they do not have 100% confirmation that the driver was Livelsberger but they have bits of tattoos that they believe shows that it is indeed him

Yeah but you have to admit drinking a six pack right before winning a title is pretty bad as*

Yes

Can always fake an injury. MRS baby!

You know everyone loves to bring up the theory of how Hamilton purposely didn't fire at Burr but no one acknowledges that at Tree lost a branch that day because of him

Doubt you can get them on this forum but Pendleton and Van Ness both stated you acted honorably

In the spirit of the holiday season you both deserve props for gotcha activism even though old Alexi Halmiton goes a little too far at times with his hatred for everything Pennsylvania. Alexi, I get it but one day you'll have to get over June 20th 1783

Sayin it's a logical guesstimation

Greg Jones

100%...There is a legendary wrestler who never won PIAA at the lower weights. Jumped to 160 senior year. Won it. Then went on to win 3 national titles in D1. Lower weight guys are just better wrestlers.

Just assuming but was thinking the New Orleans attacker planned to use an EV because of the reduced noise

Theyre only mentioning it because they wanted Texas to lose. I literally put the video up and it clearly shows a more credible targeting call vs the one everyone is being overly dramatic about

If they weren't going to call this than they weren't going to call the latter. GOOD JOB by the reviewers and refs for keeping it consistent

The first one was clearer targeting than the second. They were consistent

Below is the rule book for targeting in College Football. Kudos to the refs for not calling it after they didn't call it on the Bond interception targeting hit. They kept it consistent. ARTICLE 4 No player shall target and make forcible contact to the head or neck area of a defenseless opponent with the helmet, forearm, hand, fist, elbow or shoulder This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below) When in question, it is a foul (Rules 2-27-14 and 9-6). Note 1: “Targeting” means that a player takes aim at an opponent for purposes of attacking with forcible contact that goes beyond making a legal tackle or a legal block or playing the ball Some indicators of targeting include but are not limited to: • Launch A player leaving their feet to attack an opponent by an upward and forward thrust of the body to make forcible contact in the head or neck area • A crouch followed by an upward and forward thrust to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area, even though one or both feet are still on the ground • Leading with helmet, shoulder, forearm, fist, hand or elbow to attack with forcible contact at the head or neck area • Lowering the head before attacking by initiating forcible contact with the crown of the helmet

It doesn't have to be helmet to helmet. He led with his forearm. Hit him in the head. By definition of the rule book that is targeting

They stayed consistent with the no call after not calling it on the interception

They absolutely can.