ThreePointTakedown

Was the line 'very fine people on both sides'? Because you're answering a question that no one asked.

Seeing as you never raise a point or evidence to support them other than 'I just don't like it when people who don't look or worship like me succeed in an way' If you did, we might be able to talk but you don't/can't. Every accusation is a confession.

If you were to answer any of the questions instead of whining, I'll bet its just habit at this point, you could come to the conclusion that the right is part of the problem and not the solution. But since they dislike the same people that you dislike and your trauma response is to wish others the same harm that was visited upon you at one point, you're ok with that. Therapy is a real thing and it helps. https://www.whitehouse.gov/cea/written-materials/2024/04/08/the-economics-of-administration-action-on-student-debt/ There's an expert. Weight: lots of tons. Since its more than one ton then I am correct in saying tons. I wasn't specific as to how many so as long as I hit the criteria I am correct. But thanks for holding me to a high standard. You are making me and everyone a better person when you whine about semantics and not address any of the questions I asked in the post. But they weren't to you so I can understand how you would just find one nonesense thing to cry about. Because you don't have anything meaningful to say. But again, thanks. https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/2024042340/heres-who-really-benefits-from-bidens-153-billion-in-student-debt-cancellation Expert. Weight: unknown https://www.investopedia.com/the-impact-of-cancelling-student-debt-5101053 Expert: Yes. Weight: Unknown 'Canceling student debt could be of particular benefit to lower-income borrowers, especially women and people of color. An academic paper in 2020 maintained that the “median wealth for Black households overall, not just borrowers, would instantly increase by 42% with $75,000 in student debt forgiveness and around 34% with $50,000 in forgiveness.”9 Those are higher amounts than President Biden has suggested, but would be in keeping with his administration’s initiatives to address racial equity. ' Would you rather lower-income borrowers especially women and people of color were yolked to their debt or rather able to make use of the schooling and advance in their lives and careers? If you want to go back and answer any of the questions, honestly, from the original post. I would welcome that too. But I imagine you're too afraid to do that.

Interesting that you had to do some editing so you could continue to convince yourself that you're right rather than come to grips with the fact that your support a fascist. I wonder what other obvious facts you are suppressing? Round earth? Evolution? Hurricanes are caused by changes in pressure and not gay marriage?

Funny you say that but fail to prove it. Cuz you can't. And you take me plenty serious or you wouldn't take the time to respond in such a dishonest way. But needing to keep yourself convinced of the obvious lie is time consuming, I imagine. #RentFree In case you need proof that I was right. And I was. That means you weren't. Sorry. You just defended someone that wants to be a dictator. https://apnews.com/article/trump-hannity-dictator-authoritarian-presidential-election-f27e7e9d7c13fabbe3ae7dd7f1235c72 They said it to Hannity. Lying about someone being a liar only to be called out as the real liar. Wow that is meta. You are a joke. Thanks for the laugh.

36 years in the senate. 8 years as Vice President 4ish years retired from politics Decided to run for President after someone said there were 'very fine people on both sides' of a white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, NC. You are going to believe what you want. It seems like you are locked in to your side. Not able to see how evil-adjacent it really is. Let's do the greatest hits; against bodily autonomy, pro christian theocracy(or at least all the tax dollars they ask for, would love to see you 'reason' that one away), anti free and fair elections(yes, they are pro 'free' but not pro 'fair'), anti science when it serves, anti feelings until it serves their cause, anti EPA(clean water/air) I'm sorry for you. I hope you realize your folly before its too late to make up for it. Its laughable that you even brought up wanting power. Because conservatives make up less than 50% of the population and yet control well more than 50% of states. Gerrymander states to protect their power while handcuffing Democratic governors(Wisconsin, Kentucky, North Carolina, Arizona-ish, Kansas). All of that is a desperate attempt to stay in power. You are lying to yourself if you think otherwise and your accusations, as usual, are more like confessions. Bless your heart.

Who killed an immigration bill, recently? Would it have been perfect? No. Could it have gotten the ball rolling to solve the problems somewhere down the line? Perhaps, but we'll never know now. But as long as you get to yell about it is the most important thing, right? And that you get to keep saying 'illegals' cuz we know how that resonates to the low information/high decibel voter. Regardless of legality. I imagine you're not an expert or else please correct me. So lets not talk about legal reasons. Because some of the things SCOTUS has done are against the constitution. So your argument falls flat right out of the gate. But again, lets not worry about the legal argument(because SCOTUS in its current form is illegitimate, hence all the batsh.. crazy rulings they are saving for the last minute) Why are you against student debt relief? Because there are tons of experts that say it is a net positive to relieve the debt. If you have information contrary to that, please share it? And are you worried about 500,000 people that are already married to US citizens? How does that negatively effect anyone? Also, do you care about the families or children of these people too? I will offer evidence if you really want it, btw.

Both candidates are old and have some issues with teleprompters or glitching. That's the nature of nominate such old people. One wants to be a dictator, has said that out loud. I don't care how long they plan to keep that power just that they want it at all. The other doesn't. Biden is the only legit choice. Not a great one, granted. Would love a better one. But considering the other moron that is presumably and not definitely on the ballot, yet. Its not much of a choice at all.

Quite possible.

Yes and no. There's a decent chance that the reason it took so long to make an announcement was that a few 'candidates' turned it down after getting matching offers from current employers. Which is a tactic that some play to gain leverage with their AD. Story that Kyle Dake turned down a boat load of money to be a head coach. My guess is that it was Columbia. Being from New York and the Ivy League it makes sense to me that Columbia could be getting nervous that no one wants to be there. Tanelli leaving for greener pastures. Much like the previous coach did too. Too many turning down their offers. I would guess the amount that needed to be offered for DP to move from a Big Ten roster/budget/salary to an Ivy League school with the legacy it currently has, must be enough to take that risk. So, yes, made it more desirable by driving up the salary. How long does DP stay? 3-5 years, 75% 5-8 years, 50% 8+ years, <25%

Is it pro-life to also be pro-gun? Not talking about abortion btw. Seems like those two groups are made up of a similar cohort, tho. But can you be honestly say you are supportive of your fellow humans to live their lives. While simultaneously supporting the ownership of a thing with the sole purpose of ending it quickly?

Yes. Equated yourself to terrorists. Well played! What's your next trick?

There's a word for that. And people displaying those attributes should never be near the levers of power.

As someone so keen to type 'ANSWER THE QUESTION' you seem unable to do that yourself. Funny how that works. Why is that? Are you scared of what your real answers and opinions will reflect on you as a person? What do you call a person(like you) with no empathy for innocent people? As only a means to an end even through violence? Hint: Psychopath. You should take stock of your views and opinions to see how they fit in with how that manifests.

Why do use the G-word? If you had evidence of that, perhaps you'd have a leg to stand on, but you don't. But it seems that you just like putting people down. Is it to make yourself feel better? And what is the agenda as you see it?

I'll bet they have. Have you looked? What would that do to you and your position?

So what should we do? Are bombs our only option? Are you ok sacrificing 29% of a population to kill/destroy/crush the other 71%?

Ok. So you are agreeing with me. Does this mean the 29% deserve to be bombed?

We've already agreed Palestinians and those of Hamas are not all the same. To consider them as such for the sake of attempting to justify your position is uninformed and lazy. Same as GOP/Dems and Americans are not all one circle of a ven.

And this should be taken as fact?

When your answer is suggested in the question. And when I asked you to prove it and you can't or refuse. It is your responsibility, as an honest interlocutor, to retract the suggestion that was implied. If not, you are standing by it as fact. Which it isn't or at least you're too lazy to prove it as such. Either way, you are a liar.

That's right, project your laziness on to me. Its my fault you won't back up your claim. If you had any evidence you'd want to shut me up in a second. But you don't. Of course you won't because you'd have to read more than head lines and you can't be bothered with that because you would soon learn that your opinion is not valid and you have no basis for it other than your bias or need to punish others. You are a dime a dozen. Happy to yell about your opinion and how others are wrong but never to back up your claim. This is hardly the first and I'll be not the last time you 'Not gonna waste my time' about a subject because uniformed and too lazy to fix it.

vs three separate posts? Great dodge to an obvious answer that spotlights your lie. Or you can prove that I did articulate that and prove your case honestly. Can you do that? When you bloviate about this post or dodge the opportunity you will confirm that you did lie and lied on purpose.

It has been said that Iran and Qatar(where the World Cup was hosted in '22) has aided Hamas. Friend, ally, or group with common interest, is there a difference. So no they don't. But if you want to take another shot at answering the original question, go right ahead.

That is an answer to a question but not the one asked. Near miss. And, btw, no they don't.