FAFO: Minneapolis shooting: Man shot by federal agents has died

[El Luchador]

Just now, 1032004 said:

It is if they were not doing anything illegal, and we don’t know if they were

If they are deemed to be interfering and are given an order to move away, and don't, they are in violation of a lawful order. 

[red viking]

Scumbag pieces of crap. 

[El Luchador]

4 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

We don’t know if he didn’t have ID on him.  That just comes from a DHS statement but they have been confirmed to have been caught lying on numerous occasions including about Pretti

Well we do know it because they said it. Are you really that moronic. Do you think they would say something so easily disproven?  He still was illegal the moment he engaged in criminal obstruction. 

[Caveira]

3 minutes ago, red viking said:

Scumbag pieces of crap. 

Leftist antifa mobs attacked him 

the other idiot wasn’t legally carrying boss.   He committed crimes 

Edited January 25 by Caveira

[1032004]

1 minute ago, El Luchador said:

Well we do know it because they said it. Are you really that moronic. Do you think they would say something so easily disproven?  He still was illegal the moment he engaged in criminal obstruction. 

They also said he was brandishing a gun, yet are now backtracking from that.  There have already been numerous occasions this year where DHS has been caught lying about things that were easily disproven, you give them too much credit.

Edited January 25 by 1032004

[El Luchador]

2 minutes ago, red viking said:

Scumbag pieces of crap. 

He was not legal. Try to keep up. Kyle was found not guilty. That was a no brainer. You're only upset because a kid who is conservative killed those rioting kiddy didling criminal liberals.

[Caveira]

Just now, 1032004 said:

They also said he was brandishing a gun, yet are now backtrack from that.  There have already been numerous occasions this year where DHS has been caught lying about things that were easily disproven, you give them too much credit.

With video evidence of a domestic terrorist driving a car at ice.  You didn’t believe that so your pretty easily disproven typically 

[El Luchador]

2 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

They also said he was brandishing a gun, yet are now backtracking from that.  There have already been numerous occasions this year where DHS has been caught lying about things that were easily disproven, you give them too much credit.

I haven't heard they made a claim of brandishing or retracted that claim. I'm getting my information from reputable news sources from higher up DHD officials.

[El Luchador]

13 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Saw something where his parents were begging him not to riot with a gun.   But he did anyway.   That’s an interesting story….
 

Speaks to his thought process on this 

That's a significant fact as to his intentions. 

[1032004]

2 minutes ago, Caveira said:

With video evidence of a domestic terrorist driving a car at ice.  You didn’t believe that so your pretty easily disproven typically 

I wasn’t talking about Renee Good. For example here is one post which contained 3 easily disproven lies (oddly enough they were even called out here by a MAGA x poster).

 

[red viking]

6 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

He was not legal. Try to keep up. Kyle was found not guilty. That was a no brainer. You're only upset because a kid who is conservative killed those rioting kiddy didling criminal liberals.

He was legally carrying. 

[red viking]

9 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Leftist antifa mobs attacked him 

the other idiot wasn’t legally carrying boss.   He committed crimes 

He was legally carrying

[El Luchador]

Just now, 1032004 said:

I wasn’t talking about Renee Good. For example here is one post which contained 3 easily disproven lies (oddly enough they were even called out here by a MAGA x poster).

 

The significance is simple. These scenarios are used for training officers as the the reality of certain situations with respect to danger. The desperation to change and undermine the significance of her actions is dishonest.

[El Luchador]

1 minute ago, red viking said:

He was legally carrying. 

No he wasn't. No ID, and there is no scenario where you can be armed during a criminal act. It's a no brainer.

[Caveira]

2 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

No he wasn't. No ID, and there is no scenario where you can be armed during a criminal act. It's a no brainer.

The won’t even admit they were there to stop ice deporting people.  They were there “just to film” lol 

if he just filed.  He would be sitting in a bar complaining how much he hates ice vs in a funeral home. 

[red viking]

4 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

No he wasn't. No ID, and there is no scenario where you can be armed during a criminal act. It's a no brainer.

He was merely trying to help a woman. Zero proof he was doing anything illegal. They also took his gun away BEFORE they murdered him. 

You idiots keep coming up w b.s. excuses but none of it comes remotely close to justification for 9 murder shots. You idiots are pathetic and simply bad people. Scumbags. 

[El Luchador]

1 minute ago, red viking said:

He was merely trying to help a woman. Zero proof he was doing anything illegal. They also took his gun away BEFORE they murdered him. 

You idiots keep coming up w b.s. excuses but none of it comes remotely close to justification for 9 murder shots. You idiots are pathetic and simply bad people. Scumbags. 

He had no ID you moron and he clearly disobeyed a lawful order. Repeating the same lie over and over will not fly here

[1032004]

3 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

He had no ID

We don’t know that 

[red viking]

5 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

He had no ID you moron and he clearly disobeyed a lawful order. Repeating the same lie over and over will not fly here

B.s. All he did was stand between her and the agents, and then embraced her. ID means nothing as far as an excuse. First, where's your proof of that? Second, that was never part of the justification because ID was never even asked for and his gun was already taken. Even the trumptard admin isn't dumb enough to use that dumb excuse. You idiots are bad people and also dumb. 

Edited January 25 by red viking

[El Luchador]

18 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

I wasn’t talking about Renee Good. For example here is one post which contained 3 easily disproven lies (oddly enough they were even called out here by a MAGA x poster).

 

Yeah you want to try to strengthen your position by what somebody else said about something else it's not even relevant

[1032004]

Just now, El Luchador said:

Yeah you want to try to strengthen your position by what somebody else said about something else it's not even relevant

That post is unquestionable evidence that DHS has lied about things that were easily disproven 

[El Luchador]

Just now, red viking said:

B.s. All he did was stand between her and the agents, and then embraced her. ID means nothing as far as an excuse. First, where's your proof of that? Second, that was never part of the justification because ID was never even asked for and his gun was already taken. Even the trumptard admit isn't dumb enough to use that dumb excuse. 

So you're saying all he did was break the law by physically obstructing and that's an argument for your side? Certainly sounds like more than just filming. I knew we could get you around to reality, congratulations.

[red viking]

6 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

He had no ID you moron 

Proof of no ID? Did they ask him for it? Had absolutely nothing to do w the shooting u idiot. 

[red viking]

1 minute ago, El Luchador said:

So you're saying all he did was break the law by physically obstructing and that's an argument for your side? Certainly sounds like more than just filming. I knew we could get you around to reality, congratulations.

Stood in between them and tried to help her stand up and that's justification for 9 kill shots. You piece of crap pathetic filthy slimebag. 

Edited January 25 by red viking

[El Luchador]

1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

That post is unquestionable evidence that DHS has lied about things that were easily disproven 

Well if somebody else got something wrong at some other time from your side then what does that mean? Being as you've been easily and clearly proven wrong on most of your arguments here on this issue I think it's about time you concede.