A Question About Brown Shooting

[1032004]

21 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Quoting internet nobodies.     Possibly white ?

 

random senators no one have ever heard of do not carry any weight.   They don’t carry any more weight then random d folks running for office asking to kill ice.   

Yes the suspect is possibly white.

And yes, a sitting congresswoman carries more weight than some schmo running for city council with no chance of winning.

[JimmySpeaks]

10 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Because you know they’re not credible?

Says the clown that thinks you’re smarter if you have more followers. 

[Offthemat]

22 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Because you know they’re not credible?

I only do conspiracy theories that are true. 

[Caveira]

29 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Yes the suspect is possibly white.

And yes, a sitting congresswoman carries more weight than some schmo running for city council with no chance of winning.

More views likely occur in this thread than people who voted for her.  No one without Google even knows she’s elected to anything. 
 

bo nickal and his 37:17 magic cream healing formula that couldn’t stop him from wrestling 72 year old grandpa Cuban who has 2x+ (and more than Bo) more followers than she does.   She carries zero weight to anyone. 
 

Shit communist Romero has more followers than Bo.   Again. She is no one.  No one reads her shit and says wow.  A senator over there believes something so will I.   97% of Americans don’t trust any of the senators at any level.  

Edited December 18, 2025 by Caveira

[1032004]

23 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

I only do conspiracy theories that are true. 

Cool, so shouldn’t be an issue to share your sources then.

[1032004]

41 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Says the clown that thinks you’re smarter if you have more followers. 

I never said they’re smarter.  But if someone has hundreds of thousands or millions of followers, there’s a decent chance a not insignificant number of those followers share the opinions of that person.  Not the case for randos with maybe a couple dozen followers.

[1032004]

26 minutes ago, Caveira said:

More views likely occur in this thread than people who voted for her.  

Claudia Tenney received 235,867 votes in her last election.  How many did that city council hopeful from Texas get?

[Caveira]

Just now, 1032004 said:

Claudia Tenney received 235,867 votes in her last election.  How many did that city council hopeful from Texas get?

Admit.  You googled her to see what state she was from because you never heard of her.  I’ll admit I did.   

[JimmySpeaks]

14 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

I never said they’re smarter.  But if someone has hundreds of thousands or millions of followers, there’s a decent chance a not insignificant number of those followers share the opinions of that person.  Not the case for randos with maybe a couple dozen followers.

When I was on X I followed all kinds of idiots in the other side.  As does everyone.  

[1032004]

Tommy Tuberville definitively states Cook was targeted, despite no known suspect and no known motive.  Has made numerous posts about her and none about the other victim.

 

[Caveira]

1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

Tommy Tuberville definitively states Cook was targeted, despite no known suspect and no known motive.  Has made numerous posts about her and none about the other victim.

 

And you have  condemned how many of the recent horrible left wing terrorist attacks of late.  Your highness.  

[1032004]

2 hours ago, Offthemat said:

They are, but unlike the others, she was shot about eight times, once in the face.  Makes it look like a targeted hit, on her. 

 

[mspart]

So to understand this correctly 112344354, you are more concerned that the other person that got killed gets equal time than the killer gets caught?   That seems to be what you are presenting here.   

I want the killer caught and brought to justice.   We should know who got killed.   Period. 

mspart

Edited December 18, 2025 by mspart

[Caveira]

1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

 

I have more followers than Leanna fau does 

[JimmySpeaks]

1 hour ago, 1032004 said:

Because you know they’re not credible?

Not credible?  Like when you said you voted for Trump.  

[1032004]

3 minutes ago, mspart said:

So to understand this correctly 112344354, you are more concerned that the other person that got killed gets equal time than the killer gets caught?   That seems to be what you are presenting here.   

I want the killer caught and brought to justice.   We should know who got killed.   Period. 

mspart

I am concerned with catching the killer.  I am also concerned with anti-Democrat (“she was targeted!”) and anti-Muslim (he yelled “Allahu Akhbar!”) rhetoric being spewed that could potentially lead to more violence, based on nothing but speculation.

[mspart]

Why would those things lead to more violence?  If someone was shot 8 times, it might appear to the casual observer that that person was targeted rather than it being random.   If the killer didn't say Akbar, then nobody should be saying he did.   There are witnesses.   I heard one last night and he said they looked eye to eye.   He was not shot at.   He did not mention the killer saying anything.   

Saying the killer is possibly white is also saying the killer is possibly black, brown, yellow, green or chartruse.   It is meaningless and also should not be done by your same logic.   Oh but you forgot to mention that.

mspart

[JimmySpeaks]

5 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

I am concerned with catching the killer.  I am also concerned with anti-Democrat (“she was targeted!”) and anti-Muslim (he yelled “Allahu Akhbar!”) rhetoric being spewed that could potentially lead to more violence, based on nothing but speculation.

So you know that those things didn’t happen? 

[Offthemat]

17 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

 

Izzat the police chief and AG that said they haven’t interviewed the people who were in the room yet?

[Caveira]

12 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

I am concerned with catching the killer.  I am also concerned with anti-Democrat (“she was targeted!”) and anti-Muslim (he yelled “Allahu Akhbar!”) rhetoric being spewed that could potentially lead to more violence, based on nothing but speculation.

Witnesses.   Several heard  him yell that.  You wanna quash witnesses.    You have any outrage of any of the other left wing radical terrorism lately?   We have a few cut and  dry scenarios your not commenting on. 

[1032004]

15 minutes ago, mspart said:

Why would those things lead to more violence?  If someone was shot 8 times, it might appear to the casual observer that that person was targeted rather than it being random.   If the killer didn't say Akbar, then nobody should be saying he did.   There are witnesses.   I heard one last night and he said they looked eye to eye.   He was not shot at.   He did not mention the killer saying anything.   

Saying the killer is possibly white is also saying the killer is possibly black, brown, yellow, green or chartruse.   It is meaningless and also should not be done by your same logic.   Oh but you forgot to mention that.

mspart

Because many conservative social media “influencers” are saying things like “the left is waging war on conservatives!” based on unfounded claims and grouping Ms Cook in with Charlie Kirk.  We’ve already seen multiple instances of MAGA violence this year (Vance Boelter, Thomas Sanford, Ethan Nieneker to name a few), hopefully this rhetoric does not lead to more. 

Key word in your second sentence is “if,” as that is not confirmed despite some people claiming it as fact.

Which witness are you referring to?  I’ve only seen one which I’m guessing is the same one you’re referring to, but he said the shooter did say something but he couldn’t make out what was said.  He wasn’t “shot at,” but he did say the shooter started shooting immediately after entering the room, which is not consistent with claims I’ve seen that the shooter “walked past him.”

Right wing social media is convinced the shooter is a specific person whose name is now all over the internet, but you’re concerned I said the shooter was “possibly white”? That was only in direct response to a different poster, yes he is also possibly Muslim or possibly other races.

[1032004]

26 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

So you know that those things didn’t happen? 

No I don’t.  But many people are stating them as fact when they are not.  We’ve even got @Offthemat claiming he has sources confirming specific details which he weirdly refuses to cite, lol

Edited December 18, 2025 by 1032004

[1032004]

19 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Witnesses.   Several heard  him yell that.  You wanna quash witnesses.    

What witnesses and/or what news outlet interviewed them?

 

this should be good.

[Caveira]

Just now, 1032004 said:

What witnesses and/or what news outlet interviewed them?

 

this should be good.

The 51 intel agent totally truthful no political agenda ones ?

[1032004]

Just now, Caveira said:

The 51 intel agent totally truthful no political agenda ones ?

WHATABOUT