Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Caveira said:

No union is more political than inner city teachers unions.  Especially in blue cities boss.   
 

inventing 50 genders and sexes is what’s illogical boss.   It’s one reason you are stuck with the bad orange man.  Y’all went past we just wanna exist peacefully to you shall acknowledge my pronouns etc.  you shall have drag shows with kids.   You shall not notify parents kids want to transition.    You shall be ok with sexually mutulating kids.   you just won’t admit it. 

So you’re saying inner-city teachers who have a harder professional life than most teachers rather than teaching inner-city kids how to read and write and get a leg up from the bad situation that they are in. They’re going to indoctrinate them with transgender ideology. Do you hear yourself when you’re typing or are these just coming out and you’re just a surprise as Anybody? 
 

What is the evidence there are 50 genders and 50 sexes?

The reason we’re stuck with 47 is because you found a group to dislike and that person dislikes the same group as much or more than you do. But I actually doubt it because they couldn’t give a crap about transgender people because they’re only 1.2 to 3% of the population. And they know that getting you riled up about it and making you so fearful that they’re coming for your kids that you’re gonna be more than easily suede to vote for them. Even against your best financial interests, which you did. Because all 47 really cares about is their own interest in the interest of people like them? And probably wouldn’t pee on your head if your hair were on fire.
 

But great job owning the libs.
 

You’re still a horrible ignorant that celebrates other horrible and ignorant people and you will continue to be the one to avoid at indigenous people’s day if you’re invited at all, which I doubt. 
 

Whow whoa whoa, who is thinking about sexually mutilating children, other than yourself. No one is doing that. Again, you have no evidence. You just want this bogeyman to exist so you can continue to be afraid and justify your fear. Systematically this does not happen. 

Edited by ThreePointTakedown
Posted
52 minutes ago, Viratas said:

Ok... so this data is from the Federal Election Commission and the Department of Labor. I think people should consider the possibility of slight political bias in public schools. 

"The major teachers' unions (NEA and AFT) direct a massive majority—often over 95% of their political contributions—to Democratic candidates and left-leaning political action committees"

Maybe more about survival. What do you think?

One side wants to abolish public schools rather than fund them enough to really make a meaningful difference. 
The other side wants to help make policing less deadly by offering more money for different positions and ways to address a wider variety of situations without the need to shoot first. 
Do you see a parallel? Which side is trying to fix and build? Which side is not? 

Posted
8 minutes ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

which you did. Because all 47

I did not vote for Trump ever.   Not once.   Not twice.  Not thrice. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

What is the evidence there are 50 genders and 50 sexes?

50 I made up as a generalization.   If gender or whatever is fluid or whatever nonsense isn’t it infinity ?

Posted
52 minutes ago, mspart said:

In WA, the legislature passed an Initiative to the legislature that called for the schools to tell parents what is going on with their kids, that parents can come in and inspect the curriculum.   After passing that, the state did not enforce it.  Why?  Because the plan was to pass a law in the next session to essentially get rid of that new law.   They only passed the initiative so it wouldn't get to the voters.   So now there are two new initiatives, one to do the same as before, and the other to keep boys out of girls sports.   Signature gatherers are being assaulted everyday, people are coming and destroying the signature pages and overturning the tables etc.   All the while the Ds here say we have to save our democracy.  It is just a little bit hypocritical to do these things to people exercising the most basic right of a democracy.    

mspart

What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

Whow whoa whoa, who is thinking about sexually mutilating children, other than yourself. No one is doing that. Again, you have no evidence. You just want this bogeyman to exist so you can continue to be afraid and justify your fear. Systematically this does not happen. 

Without informing parents.  Things like puberty blockers and trans affirming care. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

You’re still a horrible ignorant that celebrates other horrible and ignorant people and you will continue to be the one to avoid at indigenous people’s day if you’re invited at all, which I doubt. 

You can’t force a false ideology on people make them conform and if they don’t call them horrible people.   Tis you making up stuff boss.   

Posted
2 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Without informing parents.  Things like puberty blockers and trans affirming care. 

Some parents shouldn’t be informed for the safety of the child. And you know I’m right. But you can’t admit it because that goes against your argument.
Let me be clear I’m not admitting that this is what happens. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Caveira said:

You can’t force a false ideology on people make them conform and if they don’t call them horrible people.   Tis you making up stuff boss.   

Isn’t that exactly what you’re doing? 
 

A new thing comes across your radar and you’re so baffled by it that you don’t even try to understand it, but instead, you’re easily swayed into fearing it trying to make it disappear as if it never happened. 
 

Tell me which is more ideological listening to data and evidence or sticking your fingers in your ears? 

Posted
1 minute ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

Some parents shouldn’t be informed for the safety of the child. And you know I’m right. But you can’t admit it because that goes against your argument.
Let me be clear I’m not admitting that this is what happens. 

All parents should Be informed 100% about medical decisions for minors in their care.   You’re again proving schools involvement in political ideology.   Politics don’t belong in schools.   The schools are wrong.  You are on the wrong side of history boss.  

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

Isn’t that exactly what you’re doing? 
 

A new thing comes across your radar and you’re so baffled by it that you don’t even try to understand it, but instead, you’re easily swayed into fearing it trying to make it disappear as if it never happened. 
 

Tell me which is more ideological listening to data and evidence or sticking your fingers in your ears? 

I’m baffled by nothing.   Feeling like you’re a woman doesn’t make you one.  It’s a mental disorder that should  be worked that way.   
 

its not a new thing coming across the radar.   Cross dressers have been around since the beginning of time.  The left is trying to force people to believe it’s a real woman 

Edited by Caveira
Posted
12 minutes ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

Not a spectrum. 
Simple Google search could’ve helped you with us

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_fluidity
 

 

I believe you are in error here.   We have been told many times that gender is fluid and can change from day to day depending on how the person feels at the time.   

https://www.webmd.com/sex/what-is-fluid

Someone who is fluid -- also called gender fluid -- is a person whose gender identity (the gender they identify with most) is not fixed. It can change over time or from day-to-day.

My son worked at a place where a girl wanted to be treated like a girl one day and a boy the next and all employees had to respect that.   

mspart

Posted
24 minutes ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

Maybe more about survival. What do you think?

One side wants to abolish public schools rather than fund them enough to really make a meaningful difference. 
The other side wants to help make policing less deadly by offering more money for different positions and ways to address a wider variety of situations without the need to shoot first. 
Do you see a parallel? Which side is trying to fix and build? Which side is not? 

Show me evidence that "One side" wants to eliminate public schools. You and I see this very differently. May I ask, do you have kids? I mean that. If you don't, then you have no idea how frustrating the system is and just how bad it is. Do I have a magic bullet to fix it? Nope, but I know when something isn't working. 

Second, claiming that the left wants to improve schools while the other side doesn't is simply untrue. We should pay our teachers the same as we pay business leaders. I can tell you right now, I would pay Mr. Herrera $100K a year, no problem, dude is the best teacher I have ever met. But Mrs. Buss, I would fire on the spot, she is not good, misses more than a dropout, and doesn't teach. Yet she probably makes the same as Herrera. That is broken. 

I believe in allocating a significant amount of money to our schools, provided it benefits the students, supports good teachers, and maintains local control. Schools should be controlled at the local level, or at the state level at worst, but not at the national level. It's been an epic failure. This is why our kids are failing: it's politics. 

Please provide data indicating that someone or a particular group has a platform to "Abolish" schools. The Dept. of Education. Hell yes, but removing that is not the same as abolishing public schools. That is leftist talking points. I demonstrated the presence of a left-leaning agenda in schools using data and facts from an objective source. I will await your data.

  • Bob 1

That’s to keep your whining ass shut. You want off this ranch, you got it. I’ll drive your ass to the train station myself.

Posted
1 hour ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

Isn’t that exactly what you’re doing? 
 

A new thing comes across your radar and you’re so baffled by it that you don’t even try to understand it, but instead, you’re easily swayed into fearing it trying to make it disappear as if it never happened. 
 

Tell me which is more ideological listening to data and evidence or sticking your fingers in your ears? 

Are these totally not interested not political teachers unions bankrolling mayoral candidates ?   

 


now That’s weird right?

Posted

693232c6-01b8-4942-98ad-842813516dbc_849

Notice there is a huge increase among the younger folks in 2020.   We've had this idea for a long time.  Renee Richards the man turned woman tennis player of the 70s.  The next most high profile person was Bruce Jenner.   Richards as medically changed, I don't think Bruce has been.   Regardless, this has been around for some time. 

But the trend is changing. 

https://nypost.com/2025/10/14/lifestyle/students-identifying-as-nonbinary-are-on-the-decline-new-study-says/

Students identifying as nonbinary on the decline, new study reveals

New data suggests that fewer young adults are identifying as nonbinary, a term that refers to individuals who do not identify as male or female.

Eric Kaufmann, a professor of politics at the University of Buckingham, released a report titled “The Decline of Trans and Queer Identity among Young Americans,” in which he suggests that the percentage of nonbinary Gen Zers in America has declined in recent years.

Kaufmann compiled student survey results from the Higher Education Research Institute (HERI) and the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), as well as private college-prep school Andover Phillips Academy in Massachusetts and Brown University, in Providence, Rhode Island.

He also included data from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surveys of U.S. high school students — the most recent from 2023 — in addition to several smaller surveys.

 

mspart 

Posted
9 hours ago, Caveira said:

Let them be real.  Who said otherwise.
 

You don’t need to teach my second grader about them.  You’re normalizing a psychological disorder to kids. 

You didn't read the article that you shared, did you? 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...