Who unalived Charlie?

[Tripnsweep]

33 minutes ago, Caveira said:

I think you’re trash.  

So then you think Charlie is too. Since he pushed that exact theory when Paul Pelosi got attacked. 

[JimmySpeaks]

2 hours ago, Tripnsweep said:

So then you think Charlie is too. Since he pushed that exact theory when Paul Pelosi got attacked. 

But but but whatabout but 

[Tripnsweep]

2 hours ago, JimmySpeaks said:

But but but whatabout but 

Did you forget to switch accounts when you replied? I think you did. 

[jross]

9 hours ago, 1032004 said:

But earlier you said stereotypes were okay if they were true for “the majority.”  Now they’re okay if it’s just more true than something else? 

I did not say that stereotypes are always good.  I said they can be good and they can be bad.  I said they are often based on statistical realities and can be accurate about a group.  That most conservatives are racist stereotype is inaccurate.  

So what are you saying?

[jross]

8 hours ago, 1032004 said:

Again, I obviously think it’s wrong to celebrate his death and his death is incredibly sad.  But he absolutely contributed to the rhetoric in the country.

The early misinformation was that Pelosi had a gay triast and was bumped on his head.  It was not consistently packaged as a violent attack from a stranger and that Pelosi was badly hurt.  The police report was confusing and the storyline remained confusing for a while.  The idea of this corrupt family having a secret become public was something to smirk about.

So when I watch that video I’m thinking of that original storyline and am not bothered, then find myself agreeable to the second part about inconsistent consequences.

 

[1032004]

2 minutes ago, jross said:

 

So when I watch that video I’m thinking of that original storyline and am not bothered,

Of course.

[jross]

8 hours ago, 1032004 said:

 

27 thousand likes:

 

I do not know who that guy is but looking objectively his word choice is poor.  I can see how one would think he is calling all blacks as violent monsters.

It is interesting that I fill in the blanks with the context of the examples of violent criminals (monsters) back in the streets committing more violent crimes.  I definitely do not think about any large grouping of black people, rather the violent criminals on camera and their supporters that say whites have it coming to them.  This is being pushed as black examples online.  It is a very small group of people, rounds to zero.  

So it really depends on the consumers background.  If I was all riled up and drinking the news koolaid, or didn’t know black people, then I could have a different interpretation.  If I was black I might think the worst automatically.

When I hear black fatigue, I think about the riots, reparation, the open thieving, the comments that whites deserve it… only what is pushed online… nothing ever in my daily life… I don’t know what others think about.

Now I read the tweet again and it’s worse than I thought.  It implies he is around a bunch of black monsters, which in the best light of interpretation is the small amount of criminals.  He is racist and attention farming.  

[jross]

14 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Of course.

Cherry picker

[JimmySpeaks]

3 hours ago, Tripnsweep said:

Did you forget to switch accounts when you replied? I think you did. 

Yep I sure did.  Find a new country yet?

[uncle bernard]

10 hours ago, Caveira said:

I doubt that 

It's amazing seeing all these people for whom Charlie Kirk was so important and beloved be seemingly totally unaware of the things Charlie Kirk actually said.

[uncle bernard]

10 hours ago, 1032004 said:

My first post about it:

 

Good luck with this with Jimmy. No matter how many times you say what he wants you to say, he'll still pretend you didn't say it. In fact, he actually gets even madder when you do say the right thing.