She was holding what?

[red viking]

12 minutes ago, mspart said:

What you are arguing RV is that the reporting of it is fine but the act was wrong.   

You are incorrect on the first.   A  male wagged his willy in front of kids and that is a gross sex assault.   See I got them both right in one sentence.   As a scientist, you should be concerned about accuracy. 

mspart

Doesn't matter one bit. The article was 110% accurate. "Male w penis" vs "transgender female w penis" is pure semantics and everybody w any brain whatsoever gets the jist.

[wrestlingguy]

1 minute ago, red viking said:

If she exposed herself to my kids and I took action against them, the reason would be clear. There's no "hate crime" so that's yet another winger lie. 

I also didn't say I would physically assault them. Could be legal retribution. 

Legal retribution? You said "swinging the hammer" that more than implied you would physically assault them. You don't get to dictate how the transgender person perceives your violence. If they say it's a hate crime and make up some Jussie Smollett crap, who do you think they are going to believe? "RV called me a Trannie and beat me to a pulp".

[red viking]

3 minutes ago, wrestlingguy said:

Legal retribution? You said "swinging the hammer" that more than implied you would physically assault them. You don't get to dictate how the transgender person perceives your violence. If they say it's a hate crime and make up some Jussie Smollett crap, who do you think they are going to believe? "RV called me a Trannie and beat me to a pulp".

Where do u get this garbage? Fox News? 

[mspart]

You seem to think your left leaning progressive ideology would insulate you from this.   This is where the left eats their own.   You would have little chance of prevailing on the hate crime assault charge.   This is what you wanted afterall. 

mspart

[red viking]

2 minutes ago, mspart said:

You seem to think your left leaning progressive ideology would insulate you from this.   This is where the left eats their own.   You would have little chance of prevailing on the hate crime assault charge.   This is what you wanted afterall. 

mspart

Another lie. Hate crime "add ons" arent universally applied regardless of circumstances. 

[wrestlingguy]

2 minutes ago, red viking said:

Where do u get this garbage? Fox News? 

WTF are you talking about? You really think you can assault one of these mentally fragile people and not get popped with a hate crime?

[mspart]

1 minute ago, red viking said:

Another lie. Hate crime "add ons" arent universally applied regardless of circumstances. 

absolutely not a lie.   If you are left leaning and assault a tranny with a hammer, you will go down with a hate crime as well as aggravated assault.      

mspart

[Caveira]

2 minutes ago, red viking said:

Another lie. Hate crime "add ons" arent universally applied regardless of circumstances. 

Right.  Like in black on white crimes.  
 

kick a trannnie your gettIng a hate crime.  They will find your posts here.   Shyte you’re already on a list they’re throwing the book at you boss. 

[Caveira]

It’s now in chess lol.   Why?

The 2025 Women's World Chess Championship was won by Ju Wenjun of China, who retained her title after defeating Tan Zhongyi in April. Separately, in a different national championship, Yosha Iglesias, a transgender woman.

[El Luchador]

The Soviet Union was able to exist on a lie. Everyone new the system was based on lies, those telling the lies knew everyone knew they were lying, but everyone took part in the lie. When the government can make you accept an obvious lie they can get you to do anything. Don't take part in the lie. Freedom only exists when the truth can flourish.

[Lipdrag]

3 hours ago, red viking said:

Another lie. Hate crime "add ons" arent universally applied regardless of circumstances. 

True.  But when a white man is involved then that's all the circumstance needed for hate to be involved.  I think Red Vikings would be charged the same as a White Man. 

Don't be such a hater of people (men, actually, no matter how many silly adjectives are put in from of the word) swinging d**ks in front of your daughter, dude.

[Lipdrag]

1 hour ago, Caveira said:

It’s now in chess lol.   Why?

The 2025 Women's World Chess Championship was won by Ju Wenjun of China, who retained her title after defeating Tan Zhongyi in April. Separately, in a different national championship, Yosha Iglesias, a transgender woman.

Why do we have separate Chess championships?  Moving heavy queens faster due to superior upper body strength gives men and advantage?  Abolish all categorization except maybe age groiups.  Chess should be genderless.

[Caveira]

31 minutes ago, Lipdrag said:

Why do we have separate Chess championships?  Moving heavy queens faster due to superior upper body strength gives men and advantage?  Abolish all categorization except maybe age groiups.  Chess should be genderless.

Historically speaking women do not compete as well at the highest level.  I dunno if that’s why but it’s true.  The best woman.  Spelling? Is Judith polgar.  She still competes… she made it to approx somewhere in the top 10 in the world.   
 

why would a transgender dude play in the women’s field?  Makes no sense