Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

To an extent yes, there are parents who do all the right things but the kids are just a**holes.    As long as the parents actions (or inaction) is taken into account, and not just the kids.......yes all for it for parents who don't parent when their kid causes trouble.  

  • Bob 1
Posted
Just now, WrestlingRasta said:

To an extent yes, there are parents who do all the right things but the kids are just a**holes.    As long as the parents actions (or inaction) is taken into account, and not just the kids.......yes all for it for parents who don't parent when their kid causes trouble.  

Good point...I agree.

Posted (edited)

Horrible idea, in general. It may sound great to somebody simple minded and vindictive but ya gotta think it through. Parents don't always have control over what kids do. Kids commit crimes for a variety of reasons. To say it's always due to bad parenting is pure ignorance plain and simple. A lot of these parents are doing the best they can and actually doing a great job. 

Go ahead and do it if parents obviously did something negligent but to just be able to apply it to everything and anything is stupid and will likely make situations worse in many cases. 

Edited by red viking
Posted
Just now, red viking said:

Horrible idea, in general. It may sound great to somebody simple minded and vindictive but ya gotta think it through. Parents don't always have control over what kids do. Kids commit crimes for a variety of reasons. To say it's always due to bad parenting is pure ignorance plain and simple. 

Who said that?

Posted
2 minutes ago, red viking said:

Ŵingers

Please show where "Wingers" (whomever they are) said what you claim....we'll all wait...again...

Posted
2 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

Please show where "Wingers" (whomever they are) said what you claim....we'll all wait...again...

I bet unemployed Jimmy think that patents should ALWAYS be punished for their kids crimes. 

Posted

He obviously didn't read and is responding without knowing what he's talking about, for the sake of being a douche canoe to get responses.   Why support it?

4 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

Please show where "Wingers" (whomever they are) said what you claim....we'll all wait...again...

 

Posted
1 minute ago, WrestlingRasta said:

He obviously didn't read and is responding without knowing what he's talking about, for the sake of being a douche canoe to get responses.   Why support it?

 

Yeah....I am good at not most of the time, but I relapse on occasion.

Posted
7 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

He obviously didn't read and is responding without knowing what he's talking about, for the sake of being a douche canoe to get responses.   Why support it?

 

I already said it's fine in specific situations. 

Posted

hell hath frozen over. i agree w/ RV.

i've seen the same parents raise a valedictorian and a a total degenerate. 

how bout just...idk...hold the effin individual responsible responsible? 

i swear this country is so smart they're stupid.

TBD

Posted
7 minutes ago, Husker_Du said:

hell hath frozen over. i agree w/ RV.

i've seen the same parents raise a valedictorian and a a total degenerate. 

how bout just...idk...hold the effin individual responsible responsible? 

i swear this country is so smart they're stupid.

Middle Aged Bearded Guy Holds Head In Disbelief Stock Photo, Picture and  Royalty Free Image. Image 23812448.

Posted
21 minutes ago, Husker_Du said:

hell hath frozen over. i agree w/ RV.

i've seen the same parents raise a valedictorian and a a total degenerate. 

how bout just...idk...hold the effin individual responsible responsible? 

i swear this country is so smart they're stupid.

Did you read the article and about the law, or just the post and headline. 

Posted
47 minutes ago, red viking said:

I bet unemployed Jimmy think that patents should ALWAYS be punished for their kids crimes. 

Why would I need a patent for this? 

  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Husker_Du said:

i read the article. 

what in the article/law makes my take invalid? 

It covers intent and neglect of responsibilities. If the parents did their job they have nothing to worry about.  

Posted
9 minutes ago, Husker_Du said:

i read the article. 

what in the article/law makes my take invalid? 

Who said your take was invalid? 
 

That said, the law does hold the responsible individual responsible.   It also talks to the actions of the parents in trying to prevent the repeated actions of the child.  It also talks about the parents being “warned” before any action is taken against them.  
 

So these matters will be investigated, and parents….who are responsible for parenting….will be held responsible for not parenting.  Along with the minor being held responsible for their actions.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...