Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Here should be something we all agree on.... right?

 

Maxwell is allowed a work release at a lower level prison camp with barely any security as it is... shortly after meeting with Trump's former personal attorney.

 Now we have to agree that a convicted sex trafficker of underage girls getting moved to this kind of prison is fairly unprecedented but to now allow a work release for someone like that with clearly powerful connections? Absolutely terrible...

the only two logical answers are that:

1: She agreed to throw names out and cover for Trump or his associates getting something in return which is absolutely horrible that this administration would negotiate with a pedophile enabler...

2: She was moved to have that prison and given a work release to be "accident unalived" which then points to a cover up as well...

Neither of these look good at all and really disappointing to people that thought the swamp was going to be drained.

 Please restore my faith in humanity and refuse to defend this predator and admin (in this instance) that is letting her have whatever she wants in exchange for cover...Thats bad, right guys? Right???

Edited by Doublehalf
Posted

Bottom line is that his administration spent (2?) days meeting with her and then provided a huge favor to her right before she was supposed to testify to Congress. 

Stinks to high heaven. If Biden did something like this, the wingers would ALL be in an uproar, but they gaslight for Trump. Shouldn't be a surprise though. 

Posted

I'm holding out hope that some folks although MAGA supporters can still not condone this and realize the absolutely terrible optics at the very minimum.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Doublehalf said:

.. terrible optics at the very minimum.

Yah, I agree, but just to be clear (I think you'll agree) here, there's 100% more going on here than optics. There was some type of transaction here. Hopefully the wingers all realize that. 

Posted
26 minutes ago, Doublehalf said:

Here should be something we all agree on.... right?

 

Maxwell is allowed a work release at a lower level prison camp ...

Reference?

.

Posted

Maxwell’s Bureau of Prisons classification shows her custody status as “OUT,” which normally would mean she is permitted to work outside the federal prison camp in Bryan, Texas, where she is being held. That is a privilege that convicted sex offenders are not permitted under the bureau’s own rules.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Doublehalf said:

Maxwell’s Bureau of Prisons classification shows her custody status as “OUT,” which normally would mean she is permitted to work outside the federal prison camp in Bryan, Texas, where she is being held. That is a privilege that convicted sex offenders are not permitted under the bureau’s own rules.

I already posted a legitimate news source disagreeing.    What’s your source?

Posted
4 minutes ago, Caveira said:

I already posted a legitimate news source disagreeing.    What’s your source?

The claim originates from Newbreak (Texas State news), where a "newsman" (I have a hard time using the term journalist these days) claims to have viewed documents from her new pad referring to her security score and custody level.  He claims in those documents her custody level was set to "out", which is the custody level that allows for work release programs.   So this is where it originates, how valid it is is anyone's guess at this point.

That said, I do have a question for you regarding your 'legitimate news source', as you are often railing about the main stream media being agenda driven and not trustworthy.   Is this like your claim that all politicians and government officals are 'trash' and cannot be trusted.......well of course unless what they're saying fits with what you want to be true, in which case you defend and deflect to no end?

  • Bob 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Caveira said:

I already posted a legitimate news source disagreeing.    What’s your source?

I wouldn't say Newsweek is a reputable source vs the actual Bureau of Prisons classification and the one denying it was her scumbag lawyer- shocker! Supposedly It's the same work release deal that Epstein was granted...

Posted
1 minute ago, WrestlingRasta said:

The claim originates from Newbreak (Texas State news), where a "newsman" (I have a hard time using the term journalist these days) claims to have viewed documents from her new pad referring to her security score and custody level.  He claims in those documents her custody level was set to "out", which is the custody level that allows for work release programs.   So this is where it originates, how valid it is is anyone's guess at this point.

That said, I do have a question for you regarding your 'legitimate news source', as you are often railing about the main stream media being agenda driven and not trustworthy.   Is this like your claim that all politicians and government officals are 'trash' and cannot be trusted.......well of course unless what they're saying fits with what you want to be true, in which case you defend and deflect to no end?

I have a better question for you.   Wouldn’t the news be going bonkers if Maxwell was indeed let out?  My theory is it would be 23 out of 24 hours of the current news cycle.   On tv all day all the time.  Literally.  

Posted
2 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

The claim originates from Newbreak (Texas State news), where a "newsman" (I have a hard time using the term journalist these days) claims to have viewed documents from her new pad referring to her security score and custody level.  He claims in those documents her custody level was set to "out", which is the custody level that allows for work release programs.   So this is where it originates, how valid it is is anyone's guess at this point.

That said, I do have a question for you regarding your 'legitimate news source', as you are often railing about the main stream media being agenda driven and not trustworthy.   Is this like your claim that all politicians and government officals are 'trash' and cannot be trusted.......well of course unless what they're saying fits with what you want to be true, in which case you defend and deflect to no end?

This 100%....
 

Whatever supports his/her narrative is what is right- everything else be damned! 

Posted
19 minutes ago, Doublehalf said:

Maxwell’s Bureau of Prisons classification shows her custody status as “OUT,” 

link?

.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Caveira said:

I have a better question for you.   Wouldn’t the news be going bonkers if Maxwell was indeed let out?  My theory is it would be 23 out of 24 hours of the current news cycle.   On tv all day all the time.  Literally.  

Is this another deflection attempt so you don't have to address what I brought up to you?   

But I will address your question, do you care to do the same???

First.....she would have to have actually be let out at this point.   There is nothing that says she has actually left the prison yet.   The report is that she has been given a security score and custody level that woud make her eligible, and that's as far as it has gotten to this point.

Second...that whole reading comprehension thing creeps in again.   If you were more capable with that skill, I wouldn't have had to explain the 'first'.  

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

I wouldn't have had to explain the 'first'.  

This is a common theme... they always require everything to be explained to them in an easy to digest way. It's fairly exhausting but I believe that is a tactic they use. They rarely if ever are asking in good faith which is why I'm really not bothering to spoon feed them information they just be able to logically think through.

Edited by Doublehalf
Posted
1 hour ago, Doublehalf said:

Here should be something we all agree on.... right?

 

Maxwell is allowed a work release at a lower level prison camp with barely any security as it is... shortly after meeting with Trump's former personal attorney.

 Now we have to agree that a convicted sex trafficker of underage girls getting moved to this kind of prison is fairly unprecedented but to now allow a work release for someone like that with clearly powerful connections? Absolutely terrible...

the only two logical answers are that:

1: She agreed to throw names out and cover for Trump or his associates getting something in return which is absolutely horrible that this administration would negotiate with a pedophile enabler...

2: She was moved to have that prison and given a work release to be "accident unalived" which then points to a cover up as well...

Neither of these look good at all and really disappointing to people that thought the swamp was going to be drained.

 Please restore my faith in humanity and refuse to defend this predator and admin (in this instance) that is letting her have whatever she wants in exchange for cover...That's bad, right guys? Right???

I will say it. It's extremely obvious that something isn't right with this situation. I feel like Trump's moves just keep getting bolder and bolder, almost like he is seeing how far he can push it. There is 100% no reason why she should be allowed work release.

Posted
2 minutes ago, wrestlingguy said:

I will say it. It's extremely obvious that something isn't right with this situation. I feel like Trump's moves just keep getting bolder and bolder, almost like he is seeing how far he can push it. There is 100% no reason why she should be allowed work release.

She did SOMETHING for him, obviously. You have to be a complete idiot or in denial or just lying to say otherwise. 

Posted
1 minute ago, red viking said:

She did SOMETHING for him, obviously. You have to be a complete idiot or in denial or just lying to say otherwise. 

That is exactly what I was saying. . .

Posted
8 minutes ago, headshuck said:

 

If it’s true, her life is at risk.

 

And if her life is at risk- this was done on purpose knowing that outcome would come to fruition.

Posted
24 minutes ago, Doublehalf said:

Eerily quiet in here when some posters on here know they agree but can't admit it for whatever TDS it is they have...

Wait they let her out?   I didn’t see that 

  • Confused 1
Posted

I just learned today that Trump made over 4,700 wire transfers to Epstein accounts accumulating in over 1.1 billion dollars... That's pretty wild. Follow the money as they say...

Posted
1 minute ago, Doublehalf said:

I just learned today that Trump made over 4,700 wire transfers to Epstein accounts accumulating in over 1.1 billion dollars... That's pretty wild. Follow the money as they say...

Epstein was a pimp!!!!

Posted
2 minutes ago, Doublehalf said:

I just learned today that Trump made over 4,700 wire transfers to Epstein accounts accumulating in over 1.1 billion dollars... That's pretty wild. Follow the money as they say...

I may have heard it was 54,700 transfers amounting to 378 billion dollars ... make it big again.

.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...