Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-planned-parenthood-abortion-medicaid-e056395b9e5646d13539e76605027a1f

Supreme Court says states can block Medicaid money for health care at Planned Parenthood

WASHINGTON (AP) — States can block the country’s biggest abortion provider, Planned Parenthood, from receiving Medicaid money for health services such as contraception and cancer screenings without facing lawsuits from patients, the Supreme Court ruled on Thursday.

The 6-3 opinion by Justice Neil Gorsuch and joined by the rest of the court’s conservatives was not directly about abortion, but it comes as Republicans back a wider push across the country to defund the organization. It closes off Planned Parenthood’s primary court path to keeping Medicaid funding in place: patient lawsuits.

... South Carolina argued that patients should not be able file such lawsuits. The state pointed to lower courts that have been swayed by similar arguments and allowed states such as Texas to act against Planned Parenthood.

The high court majority agreed.

“Deciding whether to permit private enforcement poses delicate policy questions involving competing costs and benefits — decisions for elected representatives, not judges,” Gorsuch wrote. He pointed out that patients can appeal through other administrative processes if coverage is denied.

mspart

Posted
2 hours ago, red viking said:

Tough break for taxpayers. Most of the extra kids born as a result (if any) will cost orders of magnitude more in medicaid than the cost of the abortions. 

If the court decided this is a states issue why should the Feds have to fund it.  I’m also pro choice before you go all ninja on religion.  I’m also not religious.  

Posted
Just now, Caveira said:

If the court decided this is a states issue why should the Feds have to fund it.  I’m also pro choice before you go all ninja on religion.  I’m also not religious.  

"Forced?" They should simply fund it. It's the right thing to do. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

the GOVT paying for  a non GOVT entity?

the GOVT paying for a non GOVT entity which feeds an actual political party?

thats the right thing to do? 

Don't care specifically where it goes, as long as we're funding removals of unwanted fetuses. It's a basic right. 

Posted
3 hours ago, red viking said:

Tough break for taxpayers. Most of the extra kids born as a result (if any) will cost orders of magnitude more in medicaid than the cost of the abortions. 

Well we already spend $151 BILLION per year on unlawfuls so we’re used to it. 

  • Bob 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

when does the govt by me a .45? 

it's a basic right

Right to purchase a gun but the rt to remove a fetus if u can't afford it is more fundamental to the principles of liberty and freedom in the founding fathers documents. 

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, red viking said:

Right to purchase a gun but the rt to remove a fetus if u can't afford it is more fundamental to the principles of liberty and freedom in the founding fathers documents. 

Right to own a gun 

Edited by JimmySpeaks
Posted
Just now, JimmySpeaks said:

A legal gun 

Sure. Nothing too expensive though.id be good w 9mm handguns. Person pays the difference if they want something fancier. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, red viking said:

Sure. Nothing too expensive though.id be good w 9mm handguns. Person pays the difference if they want something fancier. 

Any gun that’s currently legal 

Posted
44 minutes ago, red viking said:

Right to purchase a gun but the rt to remove a fetus if u can't afford it is more fundamental to the principles of liberty and freedom in the founding fathers documents. 

why? b/c you say so? 

what decision did you make to get pregnant?
what decision did I make to have to defend myself? 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

why? b/c you say so? 

what decision did you make to get pregnant?
what decision did I make to have to defend myself? 

In the real world, guns are rarely used for that purpose

Posted
3 minutes ago, red viking said:

In the real world, guns are rarely used for that purpose

The most common reasons why Americans have them are self defense, hunting and recreational shooting.  

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

The most common reasons why Americans have them are self defense, hunting and recreational shooting.  

What % need them for self defense? 

Either way, I don't think anybody on here wants to take ur gun away. 

I certainly don't. 

Looks like another winger strawman to me!!

Edited by red viking

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...