F***ing white girl?

[scourge165]

2 hours ago, Caveira said:

All of these articles were written in the last day or so. 
 

will I start another thread.  Probably.  She said racist af statements and the media doesn’t care.  Flip the script and have Clark say the opposite.  

It was ALL Sports Media talked about for like a week dude.

The whole, "the media doesn't care," is sooo clearly nonsense since they're reporting on her RESPONSE to a question about it a MONTH later!

 

Do you not see how you've undermined your own point? 

"The media just picked it up."

Also-

"The media doesn't care."

[Caveira]

2 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

It was ALL Sports Media talked about for like a week dude.

The whole, "the media doesn't care," is sooo clearly nonsense since they're reporting on her RESPONSE to a question about it a MONTH later!

 

Do you not see how you've undermined your own point? 

"The media just picked it up."

Also-

"The media doesn't care."

You didn’t answer what would the media say if Clark said the opposite racist af comment 

Edited 18 hours ago by Caveira

[1032004]

19 minutes ago, Caveira said:

You didn’t answer what would the media say if Clark said the opposite racist af comment 

Except for this comment to make sense, we’d need to know for sure if Griner said what you think.  We don’t.

[Caveira]

Just now, 1032004 said:

Except for this comment to make sense, we’d need to know for sure if Griner said what you think.  We don’t.

I saw what I saw.  100% she said racist stuff.  

[scourge165]

15 minutes ago, Caveira said:

I saw what I saw.  100% she said racist stuff.  

You determined 100% what she said because you want to play that race card SOOO badly. 

[1032004]

18 minutes ago, Caveira said:

I saw what I saw.  100% she said racist stuff.  

Cool, how much do you charge for your professional lip reading services?

Edited 18 hours ago by 1032004

[Caveira]

20 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Except for this comment to make sense, we’d need to know for sure if Griner said what you think.  We don’t.

It’s obvious what she said.  Else why would the media keep asking her.  Can you read lips.  It’s obvious boss 

[Caveira]

1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

Cool, how much do you charge for your professional lip reading services?

Free

[1032004]

4 minutes ago, Caveira said:

It’s obvious what she said.  Else why would the media keep asking her.  Can you read lips.  It’s obvious boss 

So why did you start this thread and ask it as a question?

[scourge165]

13 minutes ago, Caveira said:

It’s obvious what she said.  Else why would the media keep asking her.  Can you read lips.  It’s obvious boss 

What the hell? I thought the media didn't care?

Also, who "keeps asking her?" Fox, NY Post? 

 

What are you looking for here? 'f'ing whack call' is at LEAST as likely as 'f'ing white girl,' given how many white women she plays with and she just fouled...a black girl and got called for the foul. One makes sense, one really doesn't. But...benefit of the doubt, both are possible and equally likely.

If it's "f'ing white girl," like you so badly need it to be...what do you want done here?

 

I can't stand her as a person, but you're SO outraged, you're not sure what she said, you're only convincing yourself you are. And based on what you're convincing yourself of, you want WHAT done? 

A hypothetical "what if" and asking 'what if Clark said f'ing black girl?'

 

People would care more. They'd care more because more people care about Clark, because the league is predominately black and because the HEAVY-HEAVY burden we as white people have to carry is a... racial(I don't even know what you'd call it, it's not a slur) doesn't QUITE hit as hard because of...ya know, the last 400 years. 

 

So what do you want between this thread and a 3rd thread in which we AGAIN rehash this, what outcome would you like here?

Edited 17 hours ago by scourge165

[Caveira]

49 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

So why did you start this thread and ask it as a question?

Because I knew blue peoples would never admit what she said and twist everything they could to make it sound otherwise.   It messes with their narrative.  

[Tripnsweep]

I like how Cav/JimmySpeaks gets so mad about this. But then turns around and insists that Trump supporters and Trump himself are definitely not racist.

[1032004]

Can we admit Clark or her teammates aren’t innocent in some of this stuff?

Looks like today’s game was mostly white on white crime.  
 

Not sure what part of the game this happened, but speaking of lip reading, and no I’m not sure if this is accurate…

 

 
This eye poke did look dirty:

 

But I think Clark either tripped because of her eye, or took a dive here:

 

 

Then Sophie Cunningham retaliates with the illegal headlock (I do think the contrast of folks celebrating this vs how they react if someone fouls Clark is interesting): 

 

 

 

 

Edited 15 hours ago by 1032004

[WrestlingRasta]

Clark does take a bit of a beating, however she does play a heated, mouthy, cocky game.  Sometimes you reap what you sow.  Regarding Griner, 1) I don't like that she was traded for a murderer....not at all; 2) "Drug addict".........okay 3) I won't get into arguing about what she actually said, I'll leave it up to people who want to get mad, but since we can't 100% ascertain what she said without the audio, we can take in the context of the situation, which was that she fouled out of the game by fouling Natasha Howard, a black girl, and not Caitlin Clark.  Howard then went to the line to shoot her two free throws.    I'll leave the rest to ya'll to be mad.

 

“OutKick should never be allowed around the WNBA”: Natalie Esquire rips into reporter who questioned Brittney Griner about Caitlin Clark slur

[JimmySpeaks]

8 hours ago, Tripnsweep said:

I like how Cav/JimmySpeaks gets so mad about this. But then turns around and insists that Trump supporters and Trump himself are definitely not racist.

But but but …… Trump.  TDS 

[1032004]

29 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Clark does take a bit of a beating, however she does play a heated, mouthy, cocky game.  Sometimes you reap what you sow.  Regarding Griner, 1) I don't like that she was traded for a murderer....not at all; 2) "Drug addict".........okay 3) I won't get into arguing about what she actually said, I'll leave it up to people who want to get mad, but since we can't 100% ascertain what she said without the audio, we can take in the context of the situation, which was that she fouled out of the game by fouling Natasha Howard, a black girl, and not Caitlin Clark.  Howard then went to the line to shoot her two free throws.    I'll leave the rest to ya'll to be mad.

 

“OutKick should never be allowed around the WNBA”: Natalie Esquire rips into reporter who questioned Brittney Griner about Caitlin Clark slur

Thanks for the context.  It does look like the first thing she says is “trash,” which I think most would agree typically refers to a ref’s call.  So the logical conclusion would be that what followed was probably also about the call.

Edited 8 hours ago by 1032004