Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Is this a mental health issue?

I don't think Trump believed he won(well, we know he knew he lost)... but so many others did. 

Beyond that, if they could rig it in 2020, why not rig it better? Why not rig it in 2024?  Or was it rigged in 2024 and Trump just agreed to play along with the rigging?

 

Makes ya think, doesn't it? Kinda like, 'I think this is mind numbingly stupid.' 

  • Bob 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Satan has literally taken over the GOP. I would say that about 67% of wingers are possessed by Satan or otherwise by one or more demonic entities. It's not even a debate anymore with the widespread support of open corruption, blatant racism, hatred and obsession over transgender athletes. 

  • Bob 1
Posted

Lindell made a video of the voter fraud and offered $5Million to anyone who could prove it wrong.

One guy did so. https://apnews.com/article/mike-lindell-election-denial-arbitration-award-a9b27dd8d37eab1d0f22111566feba93

Lindell won't pay.

He has shut down a few of his operations & has so many legal problems he will probably file bankruptcy one of these days.

  • Bob 2

” Never attribute to inspiration that which can be adequately explained by delusion”.

Posted
On 6/2/2025 at 3:41 PM, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

This is what you dingbats sound like.
 

Just looking at the thread title don't ya think it would be hard to prove that Satan did not do something?  

.

Posted
18 hours ago, red viking said:

Satan has literally taken over the GOP. I would say that about 67% of wingers are possessed by Satan or otherwise by one or more demonic entities. It's not even a debate anymore with the widespread support of open corruption, blatant racism, hatred and obsession over transgender athletes. 

LOL... yeah, and they're SO convinced everyone is out to get them, but Trump REALLY cares about them. 


I will say... the left just blew the last one. You're handing them a LAYUP over something we all know isn't right. Males should NOT participate athletically against Females. People even like to cite these rare athletic feats that Men are inferior to Women at...I think it's like the super marathons where some women can compete and then...like long distance swimming in cold water...but it really should pretty simple and not a fight the left should be at all invested in.

Posted
1 hour ago, ionel said:

Prove he doesn't.  

The burden of proof is on those arguing in the affirmative. 

But, I'll play along.

Empirical Evidence and Exhaustive Search
If you've got thousands of years of this EVIL entity on Earth, taking all forms, but absolutely zero empirical evidence, logic dictates hat thing does not exist. 
Prove to me there aren't Elephants in the wild who taste like Peanut Butter and Chocolate. See how absurd that is?


There were a dozen religions before Christianity with the miraculous conception, a resurrection and then an all powerful evil foe. 

Christianity just took that playbook, altered it and then made some massive mistakes. One of them being, in the original writing(decades to centuries after the death of Christ) in ancient Hebrew, Mary, Jesus' Mother is referred to as "the Young girl Mary." The "Young Girl," and "The ***I have a limited vocabulary***" were close enough that when they translated it, it became the ***I have a limited vocabulary***. 

In fact, the Bible is edited every year and is so far removed from it's original version...a group of glorified editors deciding what to put in and what to take out. 

 

But belief is free. Go ahead. Just don't turn it into a silly argument. "Well, I can't answer why he's real, so you answer why this entity that there is zero empirical evidence of is not."

Posted

I think believing in a higher power(s) is very reasonable. Lots out there that we can't sense or comprehend. 

However, given that, I do agree that it's wingbat nuts to claim one knows exactly what God is like. 

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, scourge165 said:

I will say... the left just blew the last one. You're handing them a LAYUP over something we all know isn't right. Males should NOT participate athletically against Females. People even like to cite these rare athletic feats that Men are inferior to Women at...I think it's like the super marathons where some women can compete and then...like long distance swimming in cold water...but it really should pretty simple and not a fight the left should be at all invested in.

I don't think many supported transgender competing against girls but they didn't vehemently oppose it either so the wingers made it look like they supported it. Sports really aren't that important in the big picture but specific sports are very important to specific people at specific times, so the wingers did a,great pr job here. Masterful. Instilled lots of fear. " the transgenders are taking over girls sports. Your daughter or grandaughter is the next victim and will be traumatized. " 

Edited by red viking
Posted
6 hours ago, scourge165 said:

The burden of proof is on those arguing in the affirmative. 

But, I'll play along.

Empirical Evidence and Exhaustive Search
If you've got thousands of years of this EVIL entity on Earth, taking all forms, but absolutely zero empirical evidence, logic dictates hat thing does not exist. 
Prove to me there aren't Elephants in the wild who taste like Peanut Butter and Chocolate. See how absurd that is?


There were a dozen religions before Christianity with the miraculous conception, a resurrection and then an all powerful evil foe. 

Christianity just took that playbook, altered it and then made some massive mistakes. One of them being, in the original writing(decades to centuries after the death of Christ) in ancient Hebrew, Mary, Jesus' Mother is referred to as "the Young girl Mary." The "Young Girl," and "The ***I have a limited vocabulary***" were close enough that when they translated it, it became the ***I have a limited vocabulary***. 

In fact, the Bible is edited every year and is so far removed from it's original version...a group of glorified editors deciding what to put in and what to take out. 

 

But belief is free. Go ahead. Just don't turn it into a silly argument. "Well, I can't answer why he's real, so you answer why this entity that there is zero empirical evidence of is not."

Maybe you need to go back and read my post.

  • Bob 1

.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...