Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
49 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

 

 

Do you think providing 100% of the needs of South Americans living in America is a better use of resources? 

this is the goal

  • Bob 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, Le duke said:


Ironic that southern/red states have the highest unemployment, highest obesity, highest crime, worst life expectancy, worst maternal outcomes and highest dependency on the federal government and you’re focused on a group of people that work harder than anyone else in this country.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

look at the demographics

Posted
17 hours ago, Caveira said:

Illegal immigrants cost a fark ton of money every year.  From what I read it’s 750 billion a year.    In ~25 years or so we could pay off the national debt if we stop paying for illegal aliens.    

Crap.

Post your evidence.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

Maybe if you'd stayed in school, you wouldn't be living hand to mouth.

We all chose different paths for different reasons. I'm fortunate compared to most, but I know how much the government makes my life worse. I also know people just starting out who are held back by the self proclaimed party of the working man.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, El Luchador said:

We all chose different paths for different reasons. I'm fortunate compared to most, but I know how much the government makes my life worse. I also know people just starting out who are held back by the self proclaimed party of the working man.

You know only what you've been told to know by people who don't have your best interest at heart.

You parrot the party line without introspection nor curiosity, spewing up the pablum you were so carefully spoonfed.

  • Bob 1
  • Poopy 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

You know only what you've been told to know by people who don't have your best interest at heart.

You parrot the party line without introspection nor curiosity, spewing up the pablum you were so carefully spoonfed.

That's a pretty arrogant take on something and someone you know nothing about.  I can say with absolute confidence, it's not my side trying to silence information and viewpoints my side doesn't like. When your position has no merit it's important to silence dissent. History has never been favorable to the ones pushing censorship. 

  • Bob 1
  • Poopy 1
  • Clown 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, El Luchador said:

That's a pretty arrogant take on something and someone you know nothing about.  I can say with absolute confidence, it's not my side trying to silence information and viewpoints my side doesn't like. When your position has no merit it's important to silence dissent. History has never been favorable to the ones pushing censorship. 

Oh... here I was thinking you supported MAGA and Trump. 

My mistake. 

Good thing becuase how CRAZY would it be for a paper to get sued over a POLL that the President doesn't like! Which...is happening. 

(Edit-Taking out the PBS references as... that will be the only thing people will be able to focus on, not the blatant hypocrisy.)

Threatening to LITERALLY jail journalists who 'don't treat him nice,' or who don't reveal their sources.

And then you have repealing the licenses of the stations who "aren't fair." What's fair? Whatever Trump arbitrarily decides. 

 

 

But hey, it's good your side isn't trying to silence information and viewpoints your side doesn't like! LOL...

Edited by scourge165
  • Bob 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

You know only what you've been told to know by people who don't have your best interest at heart.

You parrot the party line without introspection nor curiosity, spewing up the pablum you were so carefully spoonfed.

says the parrot

Posted
35 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

Oh... here I was thinking you supported MAGA and Trump. 

My mistake. 

Good thing becuase how CRAZY would it be for a paper to get sued over a POLL that the President doesn't like! Which...is happening. 

(Edit-Taking out the PBS references as... that will be the only thing people will be able to focus on, not the blatant hypocrisy.)

Threatening to LITERALLY jail journalists who 'don't treat him nice,' or who don't reveal their sources.

And then you have repealing the licenses of the stations who "aren't fair." What's fair? Whatever Trump arbitrarily decides. 

 

 

But hey, it's good your side isn't trying to silence information and viewpoints your side doesn't like! LOL...

forgetting so quickly the hush hush.. biden's fine

Posted
2 hours ago, El Luchador said:

That's a pretty arrogant take on something and someone you know nothing about.  I can say with absolute confidence, it's not my side trying to silence information and viewpoints my side doesn't like. When your position has no merit it's important to silence dissent. History has never been favorable to the ones pushing censorship. 

I acknowledge your lack of refutation for the underlying thesis.

  • Bob 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

forgetting so quickly the hush hush.. biden's fine

See...it's the attention span right here. Once again ADD rears it's ugly head.

 

Try and see if you can stay on topic once. 

3 hours ago, El Luchador said:

I can say with absolute confidence, it's not my side trying to silence information and viewpoints my side doesn't like.

Who is "his side?" 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

I acknowledge your lack of refutation for the underlying thesis.

Why would I respond to your strawman creation of who you want me to be. 

Posted
1 minute ago, scourge165 said:

See...it's the attention span right here. Once again ADD rears it's ugly head.

 

Try and see if you can stay on topic once. 

Who is "his side?" 

His side, the leftists.  Not see the obvious may be why you have such delusional beliefs. 

Posted
56 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

 

Good thing becuase how CRAZY would it be for a paper to get sued over a POLL that the President doesn't like! Which...is happening. 

 

so you have ADD? is that what you are saying?

how many people were told they were crazy by the media covering for biden?

you just dont get it 

parrot

Posted
1 minute ago, El Luchador said:

His side, the leftists.  Not see the obvious may be why you have such delusional beliefs. 

they do have so many problem making connections

Posted
58 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

Oh... here I was thinking you supported MAGA and Trump. 

My mistake. 

Good thing becuase how CRAZY would it be for a paper to get sued over a POLL that the President doesn't like! Which...is happening. 

(Edit-Taking out the PBS references as... that will be the only thing people will be able to focus on, not the blatant hypocrisy.)

Threatening to LITERALLY jail journalists who 'don't treat him nice,' or who don't reveal their sources.

And then you have repealing the licenses of the stations who "aren't fair." What's fair? Whatever Trump arbitrarily decides. 

 

 

But hey, it's good your side isn't trying to silence information and viewpoints your side doesn't like! LOL...

Stating a whole bunch of out of context and straight up misleading quotes is not helping you argument that silencing opposition speech through government pressure is not a good thing.  You guys created a real world ministry of truth. 

 

You guys are the party of weapoized lawfare, lying intelligence officers and suppression of speech. The horrible practices of the dems handed Trump the presidency and have given dems the lowest approval rating of my lifetime.  All I can say is keep being you. 

  • Clown 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

His side, the leftists.  Not see the obvious may be why you have such delusional beliefs. 

LOL...so AGAIN, Trump isn't suing a News Paper for a poll he didn't like, threatening to JAIL reporters, threatening to revoke the licensees of networks he doesn't like?

 

Yeah, good thing the right NEVER tries to silence people! 

  • Bob 1
Posted

So your saying that labeling me as a dropout and as someone living paycheck to paycheck isn't stawmaning? You have no idea who I am but have created a persona of me to fit your so called argument.  You literally made a strawman out of me. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

Stating a whole bunch of out of context and straight up misleading quotes is not helping you argument that silencing opposition speech through government pressure is not a good thing.  You guys created a real world ministry of truth. 

 

You guys are the party of weapoized lawfare, lying intelligence officers and suppression of speech. The horrible practices of the dems handed Trump the presidency and have given dems the lowest approval rating of my lifetime.  All I can say is keep being you. 

Oh... just a "whole bunch of out of context and straight up misleading quotes," without actually telling me which one.

 

I don't think I actually quoted anything so much as articulated the threat Trump has made against the media, the "Enemy of the people," unless they're "nice to him. 


But again, good thing YOUR side never tries to silence anyone! 

 

Be a big boy and tell me what is out of context?

Posted
1 minute ago, scourge165 said:

LOL...so AGAIN, Trump isn't suing a News Paper for a poll he didn't like, threatening to JAIL reporters, threatening to revoke the licensees of networks he doesn't like?

 

Yeah, good thing the right NEVER tries to silence people! 

Your over simplistic representation is wrong to the point of being fraudulent. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...