Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Lunaticfringe said:

Argument for Hardy at 141, otherwise Bartlett has 2 wins over Mendez. Only loss to Vombaur who isn’t up for the 1 seed.

Hardy has three losses though. Including to a guy he’s fighting for the number one seed. You can eliminate Mendez who now has three losses all to BB and Hardy. Andrew Alirez is a former national champ with one loss. 
 

In the end I am not sure what they will do.

Posted
Just now, Jimmy Cinnabon said:

What about Alirez?

He has a good case as well.  He sat out all of last year though so his title is from two years back.  In which case, I might have to weigh a 2nd from last year as more impressive.  Bartlett and Alirez both have one loss this year.  Bartlett was to Vombaur who is a higher ranked wrestler than Jamison

Posted
Just now, flyingcement said:

He has a good case as well.  He sat out all of last year though so his title is from two years back.  In which case, I might have to weigh a 2nd from last year as more impressive.  Bartlett and Alirez both have one loss this year.  Bartlett was to Vombaur who is a higher ranked wrestler than Jamison

I think they’ll go Hardy or Alirez 

Posted
1 minute ago, Jimmy Cinnabon said:

Who get the 1 seed at 125?

Could still be Ramos - he only has one loss and it was to Lilledahl who has his own case for number one, but has one more loss.

Posted

Lilledahl or Ramos at 125, 141 will be very interesting. I’d guess Bartlett or Alirez, Hardy has one too many L’s.

What about Shapiro at 157?

Posted
5 minutes ago, Jimmy Cinnabon said:

Is Hamiti undefeated?

up until tonight yes.  he stands to be a pretty significant underdog against O'Toole tonight however.  

Posted
3 minutes ago, MLB9 said:

Lilledahl or Ramos at 125, 141 will be very interesting. I’d guess Bartlett or Alirez, Hardy has one too many L’s.

What about Shapiro at 157?

Is Shapiro undefeated conference champ?  If not then I think you can’t ding Kasak. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, flyingcement said:

Could still be Ramos - he only has one loss and it was to Lilledahl who has his own case for number one, but has one more loss.

It was a bad loss though (MD)

Posted
1 minute ago, Jimmy Cinnabon said:

It was a bad loss though (MD)

Lilledahl was pinned by McCrone though.  And Strickberger has also been majored (by Figueroa) and has a loss to Spencer Moore 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Jimmy Cinnabon said:

Is Shapiro undefeated conference champ?  If not then I think you can’t ding Kasak. 

No.

Both him and Kasak have a MFF loss.

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Jimmy Cinnabon said:

Is Shapiro undefeated conference champ?  If not then I think you can’t ding Kasak. 

I believe he mirrors Kasak with one medical loss, not sure though. How many matches does Figs have? I know he just has the one loss, but he wasn’t a conference champion in a weaker conference. Can’t be him

Posted
1 minute ago, MLB9 said:

I believe he mirrors Kasak with one medical loss, not sure though. How many matches does Figs have? I know he just has the one loss, but he wasn’t a conference champion in a weaker conference. Can’t be him

Kasak probably has better wins though and won a much tougher conference. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, flyingcement said:

Lilledahl was pinned by McCrone though.  And Strickberger has also been majored (by Figueroa) and has a loss to Spencer Moore 

Feels odd to put a guy at #1 after he was majored by the big ten champion. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...