Conference Championship Week Police Blotter

[SetonHallPirate]

https://wrestlingbypirate.wordpress.com/2025/03/06/conference-championship-week-police-blotter-2025-working-document/

[dragit]

I was going to chastise you that there was already an open Ferrari thread for this but then clicked the link and saw what your (good) topic really was.

[BigRedFan]

Jeez, another Anthony Knox, Jr. thread.  Oh, never mind.

[SetonHallPirate]

Had its first entry, in the last match of the night for Pac-12's.

[SetonHallPirate]

And there was another one to add...this one, unfortunately, due to injury.

[wrestlingfan22]

Waterman takes out Berginic who allocated the only spot for EIWAs at 133

[SetonHallPirate]

1 minute ago, wrestlingfan22 said:

Waterman takes out Berginic who allocated the only spot for EIWAs at 133

Yep! He's there! A couple more filled out since I last posted.

[SetonHallPirate]

This continues to be updated...expect quite a few today!

[SetonHallPirate]

Continues to be updated...

[SetonHallPirate]

This document is now complete.

[Ragu]

Are the victims almost locks to get the at larges or are there others at play 

[Idaho]

The criteria for at large from the NCAA: "The coaches’ ranking and RPI are two of several criteria that will be evaluated during the at-large selection and seeding process along with head-to-head competition, quality wins, conference tournament placement, results versus common opponents and win percentage."

@SetonHallPirate is it possible for a wrestler who did not earn an allocation to be able to pass a wrester who did earn an allocation to get an at-large?  

[Idaho]

@SetonHallPirate you have Conway as a victim at 157 - The Big 12 gets 7 at 157 and he finished 7th from what I can see. 

[Wrestleknownothing]

17 minutes ago, Idaho said:

The criteria for at large from the NCAA: "The coaches’ ranking and RPI are two of several criteria that will be evaluated during the at-large selection and seeding process along with head-to-head competition, quality wins, conference tournament placement, results versus common opponents and win percentage."

@SetonHallPirate is it possible for a wrestler who did not earn an allocation to be able to pass a wrester who did earn an allocation to get an at-large?  

Yes. If the allocation earner places at least two spots below the allocation level in their conference they are automatically eliminated, so a non-earner who finished one below the allocation total could, with the right mix of other criteria, take an at-large spot. Less likely is an allocation earner finishing one below the allocation level and then losing out on the other credentials as they would have entered the tournie with a lead there.