Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 3/5/2025 at 9:02 PM, Gene Mills Fan said:

Would that include Hunter, Liz and the others? 

Expand  

There's a difference if you haven't been charged with anything and it's preemptive. But I believe Hunter had already pleaded guilty so it didn't really matter. Kind of like when Symington got a pardon from Bill Clinton after he had saved Clinton from drowning in college. Symington was guilty as sin and if he had been anyone else, he would have gone to prison just like Charles Keating. 

Posted
  On 3/5/2025 at 9:10 PM, Tripnsweep said:

There's a difference if you haven't been charged with anything and it's preemptive. But I believe Hunter had already pleaded guilty so it didn't really matter. Kind of like when Symington got a pardon from Bill Clinton after he had saved Clinton from drowning in college. Symington was guilty as sin and if he had been anyone else, he would have gone to prison just like Charles Keating. 

Expand  

why would you need a preemptive pardon? 

Posted

It doesn't matter if every single one of the pardoned J6ers are guilty of the crimes they were charged with.  BECAUSE pre-pardon, J6 dismissals were under 1%. Compare that to Portland where ~60% of federal cases were dismissed. BECAUSE that is the ideologic justice we were living under.  

Were most of the people guilty?  Yes.  Were people pre-detained for 300+ days?  Yes.  Were prosecutors trying to slap the hardest crime possible?  Yes.  Did rejected plea deals lead to escalating indictments?  Yes.  Coercion.  Yes.

  • Bob 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...