Hillary gonna teach

[mspart]

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/the-only-masterclass-hillary-clinton-should-teach-is-overcoming-defeat-in-presidential-elections

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/12/hillary-announces-masterclass-in-losing-to-trump.html

Like they say.   Thems that can't do, teach. 

Disclaimer - This is meant as a moment of levity.   The old saying is not necessarily true in all cases, but is funny nonetheless.    I wish her great success in her teaching endeavors.  And I hope this is now her life's mission rather than trying to be a political actor. 

mspart

 

[RYou]

That appointment is akin to the one Biden had from Penn.  Do nothing for $1,000,000.  She'll be obligated to attend a few fund raising events on campus, but never have to appear in a classroom.

[MPhillips]

Great gig if you can get it.

[Plasmodium]

3 hours ago, RYou said:

That appointment is akin to the one Biden had from Penn.  Do nothing for $1,000,000.  She'll be obligated to attend a few fund raising events on campus, but never have to appear in a classroom.

If those events raise $1,000,001, it is money well spent?

[mspart]

I don't think so.   Money well spent would bring in 10%, so $1,100,000 would be money well spent. 

You are suggesting an increase of 0.0001% is money well spent.   No one in investments would agree with that.  You want a decent rate of return.   10% is not the minimum, but certainly not the max either.   But 0.0001%, not worth the time of even HR adding her to the payroll. 

mspart

 

[Plasmodium]

2 hours ago, mspart said:

I don't think so.   Money well spent would bring in 10%, so $1,100,000 would be money well spent. 

You are suggesting an increase of 0.0001% is money well spent.   No one in investments would agree with that.  You want a decent rate of return.   10% is not the minimum, but certainly not the max either.   But 0.0001%, not worth the time of even HR adding her to the payroll. 

mspart

 

Wow

[Mike Parrish]

2 hours ago, mspart said:

I don't think so.   Money well spent would bring in 10%, so $1,100,000 would be money well spent. 

You are suggesting an increase of 0.0001% is money well spent.   No one in investments would agree with that.  You want a decent rate of return.   10% is not the minimum, but certainly not the max either.   But 0.0001%, not worth the time of even HR adding her to the payroll. 

mspart

 

Why do you care so much?

 

Edited January 6, 2023 by Mike Parrish

[mspart]

I don't.   If you read my first post on this, you will see that.  I was just making a funny. 

If you are referring to the comment about return, I was just stating that 0.0001% would not be a good rate of return and no one would think so.  Do you?

mspart

[Mike Parrish]

1 minute ago, mspart said:

I was just making a funny.

So was I.

I suspect we'd enjoy each other more in person over a couple of beers.

Lots seems to be lost in translation here.

[mspart]

I think that is probably true.   Tough to see the grins and chuckles on the other side of the keyboard while typing. 

mspart

[BerniePragle]

I'm gonna guess she wouldn't be teaching at trump University.
However, trump will be teaching Nepotism 6501, and Arrears and Bankruptcy 7655.  He can both teach and do.  What a guy...