Dinesh D’Souza admits his "film" was full of s---

[Tripnsweep]

https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/maricopa-county-recorder-wants-apology-debunked-2000-mules-20696647

Probably trying to minimize the damage from what are likely to be successful defamation lawsuits against him. 

[Wrestleknownothing]

"most people with decent critical thinking skills recognized it as a slipshod falsity."

That's where they get ya.

[WrestlingRasta]

This was like the bible to a whole lot of sheep.   woops.

[Le duke]

"most people with decent critical thinking skills recognized it as a slipshod falsity."
That's where they get ya.

I believe multiple posters here have cited it in a more positive light.

“If those kids could read, they’d be very upset.”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Tripnsweep]

1 hour ago, Le duke said:

I believe multiple posters here have cited it in a more positive light.

“If those kids could read, they’d be very upset.”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah but why upset them when they think Russia are the good guys, Mexico is invading us, and that electing an 80 year old felon with tertiary syphilis is a good idea. 

[Offthemat]

• DINESH D'SOUZA
• / 
• STATEMENT ON 2000 MULES

STATEMENT ON 2000 MULES

As those who have seen the film or read the book know, “2000 Mules” was based on cell phone geolocation data collected and reviewed by True the Vote. An analysis of this data revealed highly suspicious patterns of certain cell phones, which were recorded in the location of ten or more dropboxes. This data was the premise of the film.

 

During the production of this film, as a supplement to the geolocation data, True the Vote provided my team with ballot drop box surveillance footage that had been obtained through open records requests. We were assured that the surveillance videos had been linked to geolocation cell phone data, such that each video depicted an individual who had made at least 10 visits to drop boxes. Indeed, it is clear from the interviews within the film itself that True the Vote was correlating the videos to geolocation data. 

 

We recently learned that surveillance videos used in the film may not have actually been correlated with the geolocation data.

 

I know that the film and my book create the impression that these individuals were mules that had been identified as suspected ballot harvesters based on their geotracked cell phone data. While all of these individuals’ images were blurred and unrecognizable, one of the individuals has since come forward publicly and has initiated a lawsuit over the use of his blurred image in the film and the book. I owe this individual, Mark Andrews, an apology. I now understand that the surveillance videos used in the film were characterized on the basis of inaccurate information provided to me and my team. If I had known then that the videos were not linked to geolocation data, I would have clarified this and produced and edited the film differently. 

 

We operated in good faith and in reliance on True the Vote.  We continue to have confidence in their work and also in the basic message of “2000 Mules,” namely, that the 2020 election was not the “most secure election in US history”—far from it!—and  that there was systematic election fraud sufficient to call the outcome into question. We also continue to have faith that True the Vote’s underlying geolocation data and analysis uncovered highly suspicious cell phone travel patterns, including a significant number of cell phone IDs that were recorded at more than ten drop box locations. While the video in the film created an incorrect inference as to Mr. Andrews, the underlying premise of the film holds true.

 

Indeed, the accuracy of the general proposition of ‘2000 Mules” was publicly confirmed recently by the disclosure of a leading Democratic organizer, who admitted to an undercover journalist that the premise of “2000 Mules” is accurate.  

 

Again, I apologize to Mr. Andrews. I make this apology not under the terms of a settlement agreement or other duress, but because it is the right thing to do, given what we have now learned. While I do not believe Mr. Andrews was ever identified by the film or book, I am sorry for any harm he believes he and his family has suffered as a result of “2000 Mules.”

[Tripnsweep]

On 12/5/2024 at 8:40 AM, Offthemat said:

 

• DINESH D'SOUZA
• / 
• STATEMENT ON 2000 MULES

STATEMENT ON 2000 MULES

As those who have seen the film or read the book know, “2000 Mules” was based on cell phone geolocation data collected and reviewed by True the Vote. An analysis of this data revealed highly suspicious patterns of certain cell phones, which were recorded in the location of ten or more dropboxes. This data was the premise of the film.

 

During the production of this film, as a supplement to the geolocation data, True the Vote provided my team with ballot drop box surveillance footage that had been obtained through open records requests. We were assured that the surveillance videos had been linked to geolocation cell phone data, such that each video depicted an individual who had made at least 10 visits to drop boxes. Indeed, it is clear from the interviews within the film itself that True the Vote was correlating the videos to geolocation data. 

 

We recently learned that surveillance videos used in the film may not have actually been correlated with the geolocation data.

 

I know that the film and my book create the impression that these individuals were mules that had been identified as suspected ballot harvesters based on their geotracked cell phone data. While all of these individuals’ images were blurred and unrecognizable, one of the individuals has since come forward publicly and has initiated a lawsuit over the use of his blurred image in the film and the book. I owe this individual, Mark Andrews, an apology. I now understand that the surveillance videos used in the film were characterized on the basis of inaccurate information provided to me and my team. If I had known then that the videos were not linked to geolocation data, I would have clarified this and produced and edited the film differently. 

 

We operated in good faith and in reliance on True the Vote.  We continue to have confidence in their work and also in the basic message of “2000 Mules,” namely, that the 2020 election was not the “most secure election in US history”—far from it!—and  that there was systematic election fraud sufficient to call the outcome into question. We also continue to have faith that True the Vote’s underlying geolocation data and analysis uncovered highly suspicious cell phone travel patterns, including a significant number of cell phone IDs that were recorded at more than ten drop box locations. While the video in the film created an incorrect inference as to Mr. Andrews, the underlying premise of the film holds true.

 

Indeed, the accuracy of the general proposition of ‘2000 Mules” was publicly confirmed recently by the disclosure of a leading Democratic organizer, who admitted to an undercover journalist that the premise of “2000 Mules” is accurate.  

 

Again, I apologize to Mr. Andrews. I make this apology not under the terms of a settlement agreement or other duress, but because it is the right thing to do, given what we have now learned. While I do not believe Mr. Andrews was ever identified by the film or book, I am sorry for any harm he believes he and his family has suffered as a result of “2000 Mules.”

He's gotta keep the grift going somehow. 

[Wrestleknownothing]

On 12/5/2024 at 9:40 AM, Offthemat said:

 

• DINESH D'SOUZA
• / 
• STATEMENT ON 2000 MULES

STATEMENT ON 2000 MULES

As those who have seen the film or read the book know, “2000 Mules” was based on cell phone geolocation data collected and reviewed by True the Vote. An analysis of this data revealed highly suspicious patterns of certain cell phones, which were recorded in the location of ten or more dropboxes. This data was the premise of the film.

 

During the production of this film, as a supplement to the geolocation data, True the Vote provided my team with ballot drop box surveillance footage that had been obtained through open records requests. We were assured that the surveillance videos had been linked to geolocation cell phone data, such that each video depicted an individual who had made at least 10 visits to drop boxes. Indeed, it is clear from the interviews within the film itself that True the Vote was correlating the videos to geolocation data. 

 

We recently learned that surveillance videos used in the film may not have actually been correlated with the geolocation data.

 

I know that the film and my book create the impression that these individuals were mules that had been identified as suspected ballot harvesters based on their geotracked cell phone data. While all of these individuals’ images were blurred and unrecognizable, one of the individuals has since come forward publicly and has initiated a lawsuit over the use of his blurred image in the film and the book. I owe this individual, Mark Andrews, an apology. I now understand that the surveillance videos used in the film were characterized on the basis of inaccurate information provided to me and my team. If I had known then that the videos were not linked to geolocation data, I would have clarified this and produced and edited the film differently. 

 

We operated in good faith and in reliance on True the Vote.  We continue to have confidence in their work and also in the basic message of “2000 Mules,” namely, that the 2020 election was not the “most secure election in US history”—far from it!—and  that there was systematic election fraud sufficient to call the outcome into question. We also continue to have faith that True the Vote’s underlying geolocation data and analysis uncovered highly suspicious cell phone travel patterns, including a significant number of cell phone IDs that were recorded at more than ten drop box locations. While the video in the film created an incorrect inference as to Mr. Andrews, the underlying premise of the film holds true.

 

Indeed, the accuracy of the general proposition of ‘2000 Mules” was publicly confirmed recently by the disclosure of a leading Democratic organizer, who admitted to an undercover journalist that the premise of “2000 Mules” is accurate.  

 

Again, I apologize to Mr. Andrews. I make this apology not under the terms of a settlement agreement or other duress, but because it is the right thing to do, given what we have now learned. While I do not believe Mr. Andrews was ever identified by the film or book, I am sorry for any harm he believes he and his family has suffered as a result of “2000 Mules.”

A probably failed attempt at liability management. I doubt the courts will care. The question is when does he file for bankruptcy?

[Offthemat]

5 hours ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

A probably failed attempt at liability management. I doubt the courts will care. The question is when does he file for bankruptcy?

You may be right, but does blurring the face and not identifying the man scream intentional defamation?

[Wrestleknownothing]

14 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

You may be right, but does blurring the face and not identifying the man scream intentional defamation?

Yes, given that he was identifiable, was identified, and has received threats of violence based on D'Souza's lies. It seems that D'Souza believes the same.

[Offthemat]

38 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

Yes, given that he was identifiable, was identified, and has received threats of violence based on D'Souza's lies. It seems that D'Souza believes the same.

The man identified himself, correct?

[Wrestleknownothing]

1 hour ago, Offthemat said:

The man identified himself, correct?

No, he was doxed. Then he received threats of violence. Then he came forward with his lawsuit.

[Wrestleknownothing]

On April 25, 2022, a complaint against Andrews was filed with the Georgia Bureau of Investigations (GBI) alleging that he had engaged in ballot fraud. The complaint included screenshots from the surveillance video with unblurred images of Andrews's face and license plate.

[Wrestleknownothing]

On June 2, D'Souza made a social media post that embedded a clip of the video of Andrews with his face and license plate unblurred.

[Wrestleknownothing]

Engelbrecht and Phillips showed video that depicted Andrews's unblurred face as well as his license plate. Engelbrecht referred to Andrews as a mule and described his actions of putting his family's ballots in the drop box as “highly illegal.”Phillips also described Andrews's conduct as illegal.

[Wrestleknownothing]

On May 5, 2022, Engelbrecht appeared on Tucker Carlson Tonight. During her appearance, a clip of the surveillance video showing Andrews's face and license plate was displayed while Engelbrecht discussed the alleged election fraud depicted in 2000 Mules.

[Caveira]

You could have separated the post into like 10 or 25 more posts.   Sheesh.   Common man. 

[Wrestleknownothing]

D'Souza doxed him on June 2, 2022 and continued to promote the lies in the movie after he learned on May 18, 2022 that Andrews voted legally.

[Wrestleknownothing]

5 minutes ago, Caveira said:

You could have separated the post into like 10 or 25 more posts.   Sheesh.   Common man. 

They came from many different places in the statement of facts. I did what was easiest for me. And since no one else was willing to do any research, you get what you get. No bellyaching.

[Caveira]

14 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

They came from many different places in the statement of facts. I did what was easiest for me. And since no one else was willing to do any research, you get what you get. No bellyaching.

I mean.  Do people really care about this story?   

[Wrestleknownothing]

1 minute ago, Caveira said:

I mean.  Do people really care about this story?   

People cared enough to threaten violence against him and his family. Have you paid no attention?

[Caveira]

13 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

People cared enough to threaten violence against him and his family. Have you paid no attention?

I think there may be bigger fish to fry at the moment.   So no.  It’s not something that occupied my times all that much.  

[Wrestleknownothing]

2 hours ago, Caveira said:

I think there may be bigger fish to fry at the moment.   So no.  It’s not something that occupied my times all that much.  

Me thinks the lady doth protest too much.

[Tripnsweep]

5 hours ago, Caveira said:

I think there may be bigger fish to fry at the moment.   So no.  It’s not something that occupied my times all that much.  

Because lying about bull*I poop my pants, don't laugh at me* that didn't happen to grift people like you out of money isn't a big deal? Fox News had to pay nearly 800 million and admit they aren't a news channel but rather an entertainment channel. 

[Caveira]

9 hours ago, Tripnsweep said:

Because lying about bull*I poop my pants, don't laugh at me* that didn't happen to grift people like you out of money isn't a big deal? Fox News had to pay nearly 800 million and admit they aren't a news channel but rather an entertainment channel. 

Said the 51 intel agents….   Was democracy on the ballot when he was considering pardoning the entire democratic party lol.   Talk about rich white privileged people.