Fort Hood Shooter

[Scouts Honor]

1 hour ago, red viking said:

Epitome of circular logic and 110% fails to address the god given autonomy over your own body. 

you dont believe in God

[Scouts Honor]

55 minutes ago, red viking said:

110% irrelevant to ur argument. 

yes we know

you don't believe you should learn anything.

[JimmySpeaks]

1 hour ago, red viking said:

110% irrelevant to ur argument. 

115% relevant skippy 

[red viking]

23 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

you dont believe in God

Grndat IS God!!!!

[jross]

1 hour ago, red viking said:

Epitome of circular logic 

Please explain how the logic is circular. 

 

[jross]

2 hours ago, red viking said:

110% fails to address the god given autonomy over your own body. 

The post did not discuss autonomy over your own body. 

Are you jewish?  The jews agree you have a natural right to terminate another life dependent on you... I am with the Christians on this one... (nope!)

[jross]

What are your thoughts on Palmer's message?

Capital punishment should be done in public so regular people can clearly see what the government is doing when it takes a life, and so everyone stays accountable for that decision.

 

[red viking]

28 minutes ago, jross said:

The post did not discuss autonomy over your own body. 

Are you jewish?  The jews agree you have a natural right to terminate another life dependent on you... I am with the Christians on this one... (nope!)

Its not about termination. Its about the ability to remove something from ur body and not being required to provide life support. Its 110% not her problem if the hospital cant keep the fetus alive.  

She can give it to the hospital and they can do their best to keep it alive. 

Edited October 12 by red viking

[red viking]

24 minutes ago, jross said:

The post did not discuss autonomy over your own body. 

Are you jewish?  The jews agree you have a natural right to terminate another life dependent on you... I am with the Christians on this one... (nope!)

Jews are great people but this is about right and wrong, period

[red viking]

25 minutes ago, jross said:

Please explain how the logic is circular. 

 

Using the law as a reason to justify the law is 110% circular. 

[jross]

1 minute ago, red viking said:

Its not about termination. Its about the ability to remove something from ur body and not being required to provide life support. Its 110% not her problem if the hospital cant keep the fetus alive.  

We have 1 million different women involved with terminating humans each year, preventing what could have been.  Hopefully we both can be thankful that science is finding ways to artificially nurture the fetus much earlier in its development.

[jross]

8 minutes ago, red viking said:

Using the law as a reason to justify the law is 110% circular. 

Biologists (science) agree that a new human organism is a member of the species Homo sapiens that begins at fertilization.  Some state laws (and federal law) treat a fetus as a person.  Whether a fetus counts as a “person” with the same rights as a born person depends on the context... legal rules, moral views, culture, and ...context.

It is inaccurate to make a blanket statement that a fetus is not a person.  

Why else would abortion be taboo?

[red viking]

4 minutes ago, jross said:

Biologists (science) agree that a new human organism is a member of the species Homo sapiens that begins at fertilization.  Some state laws (and federal law) treat a fetus as a person.  Whether a fetus counts as a “person” with the same rights as a born person depends on the context... legal rules, moral views, culture, and ...context.

It is inaccurate to make a blanket statement that a fetus is not a person.  

Why else would abortion be taboo?

Embryos in cryobanks are fertilized. Is it mass murder to dispose of those? 

Let's be consistent. 

Just about everybody agrees that abortion is sad and tragic, and something to avoid. Forcing somebody else to carry a,fetus though crosses an inexcusable moral boundary. 

Edited October 12 by red viking

[Scouts Honor]

36 minutes ago, red viking said:

Its not about termination. Its about the ability to remove something from ur body and not being required to provide life support. Its 110% not her problem if the hospital cant keep the fetus alive.  

She can give it to the hospital and they can do their best to keep it alive. 

grlkjsalkdjfdot put that thing in your body

i know.

i follow flijroggkjlakjlfdot and his teachings

it clearly says thou shalt allow the thing to use you

[jross]

14 minutes ago, red viking said:

Embryos in cryobanks are fertilized. Is it mass murder to dispose of those? 

Let's be consistent. 

Just about everybody agrees that abortion is sad and tragic, and something to avoid. Forcing somebody else to carry a,fetus though crosses an inexcusable moral boundary. 

Inexcusable in my culture.  Terminating fetuses could contribute to why women see therapists or why dissonance is high...

Yea i'm against frozen embryos while completely understanding one's desire for it because kids are awesome.

Edited October 12 by jross

[jross]

1 hour ago, jross said:

What are your thoughts on Palmer's message?

Capital punishment should be done in public so regular people can clearly see what the government is doing when it takes a life, and so everyone stays accountable for that decision.

 

I had not thought of this before, and I agree with Palmer.

[red viking]

20 minutes ago, jross said:

I had not thought of this before, and I agree with Palmer.

The sickening and extreme hypocrisy of the wingers continues. Trans people are gonna traumatize kids but then we should publicly execute people with firing squads. Yes, many kids will watch. 

You wingers are sick, evil and depraved MFers. 

[Scouts Honor]

for someone who wants vengeance so bad, you sure are squeemish

[Scouts Honor]

i mean are you all sure we don't need to bring back public executions?

 

[red viking]

24 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

i mean are you all sure we don't need to bring back public executions?

 

You're a complete idiot if u think public executions will decrease crime

 

[Scouts Honor]

what at this point would? 

obviously what we are doing, releasing repeat offenders, is NOT working

 

 

[red viking]

10 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

what at this point would? 

obviously what we are doing, releasing repeat offenders, is NOT working

 

 

You cant lock everybody up 4 life. Money doesnt grow on trees in the real world.  

[JimmySpeaks]

16 hours ago, red viking said:

Embryos in cryobanks are fertilized. Is it mass murder to dispose of those? 

Let's be consistent. 

Just about everybody agrees that abortion is sad and tragic, and something to avoid. Forcing somebody else to carry a,fetus though crosses an inexcusable moral boundary. 

They have to go into a woman to become a baby skippy.  

[JimmySpeaks]

12 hours ago, red viking said:

You're a complete idiot if u think public executions will decrease crime

 

Kinda like gun control huh??? 

[JimmySpeaks]

11 hours ago, red viking said:

You cant lock everybody up 4 life. Money doesnt grow on trees in the real world.  

It does in the libtardo world.