All Activity

OK still but has PSU really been weak at Heavyweight since Cael took over? Honest question. Weak compared to the PSU standard I guess.

What is really wild about the Wyomung situation is that the wrestler's inability to make weight did not impact him significantly ( he is still an AA) but it did impact the team (they lost 10 points). It seems like you would want the opposite impact.

People can move if they care that much about the electoral college, they can't change their ethnicity. (Unless you're Zohan or Liz Warren)

Well I’m off to the homeless shelter to help out. See you guys later this afternoon.

For those of us that worked for companies that have used it know for a fact that it’s mainly about diversity in the organization. A certain number must be hired and moved thru the system. It’s a fact.

I like the popular vote because I believe in 1 man - 1 vote. That's the spirit of elections. Everybody is equal, regardless of race, gender, or creed.

But you don’t need states if they don’t have ANY equal say in what happens in the country. You’re for open borders for the nation why keep them for the states?? Not necessary but can be useful if used correctly. You can say it’s not a quota but it is. It needs to be done organically

Ribbit.

@Interviewed_at_Weehawken good example of someone who actually just "copies and pastes" in the sense you accused me of. @JimmySpeaks believes these things because that's he was told to believe. He doesn't know why he believes them. He's never thought them through logically. That's why it's so easy to back him into a corner where he has to admit DEI is good and necessary because he can't abandon the belief that the Senate is absolutely necessary.

Every voter should be equal. People that live in less populated states have orders of magnitude more representation. It's bs and a,slap in the face to democratic principles.

The idiot wingers think that DEi is all about going out of your way to hire minorities. That's not what it typically is.

The left likes the popular vote because statistically they win it more. I also believe that’s core to the let all illegals in and let those here illegally become citizens strategy as well - as they should win a higher % of that vote as well. It’s just a numbers game.

No, states can still legislate local issues like they already do. The Senate is part of the federal government. The legislative branch should be concerned with governing the country, based on the total population, not artificially drawn lines on a map. Okay, so what do checks and balances for DEI look like in corporate America? You concede that some DEI is necessary?

I would be concerned about being late for Thanksgiving Dinner.

Are you advocating we get rid of states?

Wrong. The house and senate balance each other. The other two balance them. Other wise why have any states at all ????? Wow.

DEI needs checks and balances or it will never work. Which is what corporate America just found out.

He’s affirming a system of checks and balance of which both the house and senate are a part of. Neither works the way it does without the other. Wow.

The House is already checked and balanced by the Executive and Judiciary. Checks and balances would still exist without the Senate.

Great! Now that we've established that DEI is not inherently bad, you can address the hole in Charlie's argument. Answer this question: Why is DEI good in the case of the Senate and bad in the case of Affirmative Action?

I support checks and balances which is what the house and senate are set up for.

*interim champ Parris was going to take his RS in 2023 if Gable wrestled.

There is 100% a need for both the house and the senate. The senate (DEI) is balanced by the house (not DEI). It’s not that hard to see that the founding fathers were smart enough to prevent either side from taking control. That kid supports DEI or doesn’t he.

They are definitely in on them. Hope Waters can help recruit.

That exact hypocrisy applies to Charlie (and you), who oppose DEI, but support the Senate (which is DEI). That's how debating works. You find a flaw in your opponent's argument and exploit it. The student's point isn't that "DEI = Bad", it's that Charlie's position on DEI is inconsistent and incoherent. He needs to explain why it would be right to support DEI in the case of the Senate, but not affirmative action because the principle he uses to attack affirmative action is discredited by his position on the Senate.