All Activity

It's been a while in my experiance... but I certainly think it helps differentiate when we start celebrating and mocking the death of a 31 year old Father(as distasteful as some of his comments were). I thought we MOSTLY agreed that the things Mike Lee said were pretty screwed up... and while he's a Senator and... I don't know what you are, just like Trump getting shot at, this is in NO WORLD good for the the left, the Country. It only galvanizes the right and... I think most normal people find it... kinda disgusting. And... we're not talking about Trump and Epstein any longer.

I'm sorry, are you being serious? You can be dubious of the source, but it... couldn't be more clear. "None of the last 31 political attacks was by anyone from 'the Left'. Not one. We can count them." That's the headline. But yes... that does beg the question, are they talking about political violence or violence in general... C'mon. You can do a BIT better than that.

EASY. The Shooter. Though... this video is just exceptionally obnoxious. "The best news ever," should be kids... I dont' know, going to Disney or whatever. NOT listing off 4 people they wish died, then having the answer being someone they've never met getting married. BUT.... again, you want examples of kids on the right? This is so ridiculous. We've been hearing about this upcoming Civil War. It was the looming "threat" if Trump lost. Most of you on here still believe Jan6 was "a glorified tour of the Capitol."

If you want to use ChatGTP, lets use it for political violence; Prompt; "How much of the Political Violence has been Left Wing vs Right Wing the past 30 years." Short answer: Most evidence shows the bulk of ideologically-motivated lethal political violence in the U.S. over the past ~30 years has come from far-right actors, not the left. The exact share depends on the dataset and definitions, but several high-quality analyses put the right-wing share well above 80% of lethal incidents and deaths in the period 1990–2024. Office of Justice Programs+1 Details and key sources A 2024 National Institute of Justice (NIJ) synthesis (drawn from three decades of NIJ-funded research) found far-right actors were responsible for far more lethal events and deaths than far-left actors: roughly 227 lethal far-right events (≈520 deaths) vs 42 far-left events (≈78 deaths) since 1990 — meaning the far right accounted for roughly 84–87% of those ideologically-motivated homicides in that period (depending whether you count incidents or deaths). (NIJ summary). Office of Justice Programs Independent academic work reaches similar conclusions: University of Maryland / START research and peer-reviewed comparisons show right-wing extremist violence has been substantially higher than left-wing violence in the U.S. in recent decades (especially after the 2010s). Start UMD+1 Other expert assessments (CSIS, ACLED US Crisis Monitor) document that white-supremacist / antigovernment / militia-style violence and threats rose sharply in the 2010s and especially around the 2020 election and January 6, 2021; ACLED’s U.S. monitoring also shows concentrated spikes in right-wing militia activity and violence. CSIS+1 Caveats & why precise percentages vary Definitions differ. Some datasets count only lethal “ideologically-motivated homicides,” others include plots, arrests, property attacks, threats, or non-lethal assaults. Which events are labelled “left” vs “right” can also vary. National Institute of Justice Time period matters. Including 9/11 and international Islamist terrorism changes totals dramatically for some time windows; excluding those makes the domestic far-right share even larger in recent decades. PMC Under-reporting & classification. Some incidents are ambiguous or never prosecuted as “ideologically motivated,” and researchers must make judgment calls. That causes small differences between datasets. National Institute of Justice If you want this broken down numerically for a specific dataset/timeframe, I can pull the counts and compute percentages (for example: NIJ/TEVUS, START/GTD, ACLED US Crisis Monitor, or FBI summaries) and show a short table comparing incidents, deaths, and arrests by ideology. Which dataset or exact years do you want me to use? Go ahead, ask XAI or Grok... you're not going to find this idea that supports that the left is the "more violent" of the two sides. And while people clutch their pearls about comments made about Kirk, those were Ugly. But you had Kirk himself mocking Paul Pelosi, calling for Biden's Execution, you have Republican Senators mocking the Minnesota Senators who were shot, namely Mike Lee, "Nightmare on Waltz Street," which... wasn't even clever, there was much lower hanging fruit that he didn't go for, but nobody has accused him of being particularly bright.

The wokesters continue to get dumber and dumber

The bahahahahahhahah should have been your clue. I’ll go s l o w e r next time

Yep I said the fcc hasn’t done anything. You’re kinda slow on sarcasm huh?

I thought your position was that the FCC didn't axe Jimmy Kimmel Live! Didn't you say the affiliates and not the FCC was to blame?

Ice ice baby. Here we come.

You love Steve Brannon don’t you. You believe everything he says. Always have right?????

Steve Bannon said he thinks the text messages as suspicious. That they sound like a bad script that somebody wrote.

Game show. Ooooh boy. Maybe the fcc will axe that too. Bahahahahahha

Good chance. Bahahahahahha. Way to be sure

Kimmel also hosts a show in Prime Time on ABC, "Who Wants to be a Millionaire?" There has been no announcement cancelling that or suspending Kimmel as host.

Not necessarily. There is a certain amount of sunk cost with the current show. This was an issue with the Tonight Show back when NBC wanted to axe Conan and bring back Leno. Conan had a contract and NBC had to buy him out. It made sense to do it because contractually they would have to pay both Leno and Conan either way. The size of the buyout was smaller for Conan and Leno had better ratings. With the Late Show cancellation that coincides with the end of Colbert's contract. CBS would likely have to pay him for that time regardless of whether or not they air the show and he has the highest rated show in the timeslot. It makes sense to keep him on the air until the end of his contract. The cost to produce the show is sunk and since he has the highest ratings it will result in more advertising $$ than replacing him with an infomercial. I believe Kimmel's contract also runs through 2026. There is a good chance that his show will generate more revenue for ABC than an infomercial, so he might not be done for good just yet. The cost is sunk and if Nexstar's merger goes through there might not be a financial incentive to keep him off the air.

My vote was Adeline. I'm sure someone who belongs in The Zoo will make an awful argument.

Ice ice baby. Your family is next to get deported. Ba byyeeeeeeee

Fallon will be gone soon too. Late night tv is dead

It will easily be more profitable. An INFOMERCIAL would be.

Adeline 6 gold, 10 medals Burroughs 7 gold, 10 medals Helen 5 gold, 11 medals and counting Snyder 5 gold, 10 medals and counting Smith 6 consecutive gold (and lost at 2 worlds/olympics but still got a gold) Baumgartner 5 gold, 13 medals

More name calling from the snow plow driver from MN. Carry on.

Aweeee. Snow plow driver from MN with the name calling agin.

Sure.... blah, blah, blah,.. and it's still cancel culture and you're still a dirtbag.

So the graphic sucks. Losing money doesn’t cut it.

You don’t doubt??? Well then. Bahahahahah face it his ratings suck. This was the clincher