Hammerlock3

i try to pretend i'm communicating with a human being for as long as possible

well he is flat on his butt at 184 in the NDSU meet....i think he has shoes on...

a lot of your posts are what the stupidest guy in the room would rush to say....

Some of those tOSU guys look like they're going into their 6th hour of wrestling

he's in the category of people who if they say a number you have to take the square root to get the real one

I'm not buying this.

Do you have any reason to think this or are you just on here making up stuff about soft (albeit in this case deserving) targets and feeling good about yourself for some reason.

yeah the NCAA should just update that and then its killing it.

He does almost sound like a skit..."Carlos Melgoza: Private Detective"

Yeah it was basically scheme to counterfeit RPI

I assumed, I knew he wasn't that dumb, especially for a guy who probably lives in the comments.

Starocci won in less impressive style than Kemerer beat him in 2021 big tens....

Am I giving him too much credit when I say he must be doing partials? He can't know that little about lifting right?

what happened to kilkeary?

I don't think Bouzakis' style works at 141.

Against Starocci ferrari showed a) he's smart and hard wrestling enough to not get warn out and obliterated by a PSU collar tie (how many times have you seen someone wrestle aaron brooks like the plan. was to leave him on their head) b) He's really really hard to take down, the flexibility is real, C) he can compete while obviously out sized. All this is a huge statement for a freshmen.

Thanks. I knew Grok was wrong....elon is getting a strongly worded note.

I haven't seen him a lot, and this is stupid sounding.....but so far I'm getting Gabe Dean vibes.

After some work myself, it says the champ scores 21, and an 8th place wrestler would score 8, but it also says advancement in the good side is 1 point and that advancement in the consis is 1....I thought advancment in the consi's was .5?

Any who could figure this out, maybe @Wrestleknownothing, I'd be interested. Team A has a champ who wins straight decisions from the round of 32 onward. Team B has ten AAs, all lost in the Round of 32 and won decisions until the consi quarters, and then lost out to 8th. How does the scoring shake out?

Word was Stoll and a wrestler I won't name in case I'm wrong were basically just playing with guns and stoll got shot. Its very 3 stooges.

now that he's alright, Sam Stoll's goofy butt getting Dick Cheney'd is one of the funniest things ever.

oops youre right I totally forgot about keck! sorry wasted topic.

because it matters to the brand if they can get him in the finals, and he ain't doing it as a 4,5,8,9 seed. They're gonna control everything they can, no more loose chips than absolutely necessary.

I feel like the plan was to put out Ferrari against Starocci, McEnelly, and guarantee they keep Arnold away from Starocci at Big Tens, go into NCAAs with one loss, stay away from Starocci, make the finals, and on the whole thats win for Iowa (it even kind of vindicates Arnold because its hard to say its not a real rivalry if its in the NCAA finals). Unfortunately Silas beating Arnold (and as convincingly as you can in the context of an overtime match), pretty much blows up that plan. Do they put in Arnold, hoping he can get the upset and get operation "lose in the finals" back on track? I think so. Thats my take what do you guys think.