El Luchador

You can lie all you want if other liars with loud enough voices cover for you.

Here's 1

man shoots and hangs himself.

The majority of Americans have a very negative opinion of congress, however they feel like it's not their elected reps, it everyone else's.

Oh an argument of authority. No thanks.

You seem to be arguing that anything posted on Rumble is inherently inaccurate. You clearly disagree that it is simply a hosting site.

I won't debate arguments of authority. People who make them are inherently dishonest or ignorant.

OMG. You are so intellectually dishonest it's hilarious . Do you actually believe what you are saying. Until you have the balls to discuss actual details I will never consider your opinion as valid.

Rumble is no less or more reputable than youtube. It is a hosting site. The fact that they don't censor or use algorithms to suppress information doesn't make them the bad guys. The only reason to silence people is because you can't win the debate. The reason there is no left wing talk shows with success is because you actually have to talk about the details. Attacking the source only plays for so long. Try as you may the truth always wins.

Yes, but it is mentioned several times.

Wrestling is biblical.

At least he never recruited Dayton Racer.

Well I don't know if that's accurate or not but whatever is going on there is working. Although I think statistically most people have some level of faith.

It's really hard to get off the bottom when you don't need to.

If I say 2+2=4 and I post it on Rumble, it's wrong. Got it.

Not a lot of performance enhancing violation. Some of those violations are pretty weak. Also looks like we need to use better judgment in who we support. I'd rather get caught with every anabolic steroid made in my blood than being exposed as a financial supporter of Walter White.

I don't know if you think are are making yourself sound better, but your just making my point. Now information is only valid if it comes from your approved portion of the internet. Aren't you just the intellectual. The authority of the hosting site now is a thing. All this and you still haven't made an argument based on 1 single fact.

I'm not familiar with a single American Wrestler being busted.

Can you imagine being the second best guy in the world and the second best guy in your family.

Venz had a style with some holes in it and Nebraska coaches apparently didn't have the ability to shore it up. After his successful season he was scouted.

Again your not tracking the conversion. So lol back @ you. I don't give two shits about your take on Wikipedia, it's co-founder or the Epoch Times. If you want to continue an endless cycle of tit for tat we can do that. So I'll play the source wiki has no credibility card. I literally started a conversation about buying precious metals, and played a story about Central banks buying up gold. Now some how I'm supposed to dismiss the facts of this story because a seriously biased source says some shit about the source of the story. Can you see how stupid that is?

I don't care what it says, because it's not relevant. He knows what's going on, he knows how it works, and I'm sure he's still well connected to deeply involved people. But you says he's not a source of authority. You stated The Post isn't a credible source but never addressed any facts. You only accept information from people who say what you want to hear. How convenient for you. You continue to discredit the Epoch Times but never addressed a single fact. I simply don't have time to entertain baseless arguments for or against credibility from someone who literally never addresses the content that makes the source credible or not. The left isn't on any kind of a roll lately when it comes to being right on anything.

Not as bad as your ability to track a conversation.

And I suppose you know more than the co-founder? Like I said it's obvious to the point of being common knowledge. Making arguments for or against authority rarely carries anything other than bias. You are predictable when it comes to not addressing information and acting as if the source has no credibility. The Post who got the Hunter Biden story right while all other legacy media got wrong doesn't need doesn't need your approval. Like I said the facts speak for themselves. I'll gladly go tit for tat and who got what wrong.

Yes the guy who co founded it knows nothing about it. If you don't see the blatant left wing bias of Wikipedia, then you are blind. If you think the co founder isn't a source of authority, then you are an idiot. The facts speak for themselves, just like the dirty underhanded tactics and lies from Twitter.