El Luchador
-
Posts
1,211 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Forums
Articles
Teams
College Commitments
Rankings
Authors
Jobs
Store
Everything posted by El Luchador
-
Is her life more valuable than mine? If a bad thing justifies all regulation then are you prepared to give up all rights? Or do you just want other to give up theirs? -
Give me his number His first statistic is the number of gun death sited by the CDC the second is the number os gun laws. So far not so good. The number of guns is not even relevant but I believe his number. It is not that hard to extrapolate the number od guns produced and sold in America. I couldn't tell you how many I have ans I know people who own far more than me. Millions were sold in the last 3 years.
-
The source is the CDC study. It's been said more than 1 time. It is you saying he is wrong and discrediting him, should be super easy to provide information to that effect. Now put your money where your mouth is. Use your facts or retract your statement.
-
It is mind dumbing stupid that you can say a guy is wrong and not tell me what he is wrong about or why.
-
Here's so more information for you to easily disprove.
-
I'll help: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/firearms/fastfact.html
-
Yout not this dense. He makes claims, use your information to disprove his. Simple task. Prove it by disproving his assertions. It's simple numbers.
-
I'll help you
-
So prove them wrong.
-
Give 1 specific example.
-
It's not the video it's the information in the video. Tell me where he is wrong. You are saying he has no credibility so it should be next to effortless.
-
So the NRA to you is bad? And therefore you don't need to consider their position? Don't you have an actual point in which you position can be hung on? You still are making it an argument of authority and not making a single argument of fact. The source of information is the data itself. It is a dive into the actual data. Talk about specifics if you want to discredit something. Pick a point or admit defeat.
-
Still talking and saying nothing. The standard approach for a meritless position.
-
Putting the dumbest person in DC in charge of intelligence.
-
Now tell me how wrong I am without actually watching, then you can all fluff each other some more.
-
I'll help you again.
-
Tell me why? Or back to the ad hominen attacks, you pick. I'm sure we both know. BTW he isn't affiliated with the NRA, but being right isn't your strong point.
-
Not before you prop yourself up as some type of moral authority and position yourself as an intellectual and people who you disagree with as stupid.
-
Just saying the ideology of his leaning is necessarily one void of stupidity. But ad hominid attacks is the natural outcome when you have no merit. Keep in mind that was a response to an attack on my opinion. But you clearly were ok with his comment.
-
And that video breaks down the data. But you refuse the facts. You are a willful idiot. Watch the video then tell me how wrong it is. Not the other way around. I know your info. And I know how they worked the numbers in a dishonest way to force the reader to an inaccurate conclusion. 18 and 19 year olds are not children, that is just 1 deception.
-
You can refuse the information or you can dispute it with facts. Head in the sand or make an argument. I assume your position is still weak, therefore you choose sand.
-
That is some seriously dishonest shit, only being said to avoid the facts. Do you expect me to do a deep study, aqire my own data, analyze it then post? By this standard nobody is allowed to have an opinion.
-
I'll post it again.
-
Well did you watch the Colion Noir video, that beaks down the numbers. You could learn a lot.
-
Only to someone who is accustomed to being spoon-fed their opinion. How many were shot by cops, how many killed themselves how many were gang members engaged in a dangerous lifestyle? Details, you get it?
