Jump to content

Scouts Honor

Members
  • Posts

    4,794
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    25

Everything posted by Scouts Honor

  1. I asked Grok about it Based on available reports, the leaked details of the U.S. military strikes on Houthi targets in Yemen, which surfaced in a Signal group chat inadvertently including journalist Jeffrey Goldberg, contained sensitive operational information. The specifics mentioned include discussions among senior Trump administration officials—such as Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and National Security Adviser Michael Waltz—about the impending strikes. The chat reportedly revealed operational details such as intended targets, the types of weapons the U.S. planned to deploy, and the sequencing of the attacks. These strikes, executed on March 15, 2025, targeted Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen. The messages also included real-time updates and congratulatory notes as the strikes unfolded, with one official, Michael Waltz, praising the effort minutes after the strikes hit, alongside emojis of a U.S. flag, fist, and fire. While the exact targets (e.g., specific locations or facilities) were not universally detailed across all sources, the inclusion of such operational specifics in an unsecured chat was described as a significant security lapse, potentially compromising military secrecy and personnel safety. The White House acknowledged the authenticity of the chat, and investigations into how it was leaked are ongoing ?? this says the chat 'reportedly' revealed operational details. You're right to point out the "reportedly" qualifier. That term reflects the nature of the available information, which comes from secondary sources like news reports rather than a direct, verified leak of the chat itself. As of now, no public primary source (like the full chat transcript) has been released, so the exact details remain somewhat speculative. What’s confirmed is that the Signal group chat, intended for senior Trump administration officials, accidentally included journalist Jeffrey Goldberg, leading to the exposure of sensitive discussions about the March 15, 2025, U.S. strikes on Houthi targets in Yemen. News outlets, such as The Atlantic and Semafor, indicate that the chat contained operational specifics—things like intended targets, weapon types, and attack sequencing—along with real-time updates and reactions. However, without the raw chat logs, the precise wording and full scope of what was leaked are filtered through journalistic interpretation, hence the "reportedly."
  2. why do you not like the idea of getting rid of GOVT waste?
  3. oh so thats it they are trying to save people by burning up teslas...
  4. i have a new idea for elon
  5. leftists: Trump and Elon got into politics to get rich and steal your money. me: um no... they started Doge to stop democrats from stealing my money
  6. does he stipulate 10% for the big guy too?
  7. i have looked at what he posted... doesn't look classified...
  8. real... but classified? i dont even know what was released... but it's been said it wasn't classified. but again, it still may be a setup
  9. no i get that... if that was what was released so be it... but im asking if it was a set up... to find a leak... or to black ball goldberg but on the other hand goldberg isn't exactly always above board
  10. goldberg has been involved in hoaxes before
  11. He worked by day and toiled at night. He gave up play and much delight. Dry books he read, new things to learn. And forged head, success to earn. He plodded on, with faith and pitch. And when he won, trimp called it born rich
  12. lol, one example. now do all the examples of people who became millionaires AFTER election
  13. i have no idea. but i wouldn't put it past this past 'hoaxer'
  14. seems like a good business decision for all those other non rich people who run for office and wind up millionaires
  15. you always forget. Trump is a lifelong democrat
  16. i heard protect our own borders. i agree, let leave ukraines borders to ukraine.
  17. asking myself i know this is bad, but is this better or worse than a general talking with china
  18. we are talking about trump.. are you talking about obama?
×
×
  • Create New...