Scouts Honor

not that i want to go into iran

but just for all the peanuts out there...

this isn't our war etc etc 

so yes. 

i see that he did. I found some news about it. and the press is already using it to discredit him.

but

why did you say all the extra words?

now it's revealed his writings claim

why not just say

he wrote that tim walz told him....

just to be clear

i dont trust the US intel service much..

i do trust mossad... as they have been right most times and have pulled off some incredible things over the last 75 years.

so this guy wrote that Tim walz told him to kill a senator? 

2 hours ago, scourge165 said:

Of course that's their aim, I said when we pulled out of the JCPOA, there was no reason for THEM to hold up their end of the bargain. 

-I'm pointing out that SAME organization that... you're now taking as gospel, said they were Complient in 2018 and UNTIL Trump pulled out(which was particularly stupid as he's not telling Israel to stand down while he negotiates). 

-60% doesn't get you a Nuclear Weapon and AGAIN, the SAME organization, has said;

 

So yeah, I don't believe they're a week away or we'd have bombed them by now. 

Some of you use the same source in one context, ignore it in another.

 

-They're more definitely working TOWARD building a bomb. 

they hadn't been holding up their end.

and anyone with a clue knows this.

why would they go to 60% if they weren't looking for a bomb?

why waste the money?

or maybe the money obama gave them was enough.

but there is no need to go that far. 

so you can say anything you want.. but going to 60% only leads to ONE conclusion.

sorry 

i mean i know you are terrbile at making connections..

but they pretty much spelled it out for you 

2 hours ago, scourge165 said:

LOL...so to recap, YOU made the claim that Iran was NOT living up to the agreement;

So you just effectively said 'nuh-uh!'

LOL...I simply pointed out what the DIRECTOR of National Intelligence said and HOW LONG Israel has been making the "one week away" claims. 

 

I've also REPEATEDLY said that Iran is OBVIOUSLY now enriching uranium. Of course they are. Why would they NOT?

A Nuclear Weapon is a strong deterrent. 

What's more, I NEVER argued against bombing Iran(just the opposite). 

See.... reading is important Jimmy. I've advocated the US AIDING in regime change, I've never made it a secret which side I supported. Israel. ALWAYS been Israel. 

 

But this is where you're simply...not...capable of a coherent discussion. You contradict yourself regularly. 

 

You ALSO said;

 

 

So.... any chance you can answer my question?

 

-In 2018, it was a fake agreement, Iran did as they pleased despite the IAEA saying they were in accordance. 

-2025 'Here's PROOF they're enriching Uranium!'

 

I know there's lots of words here and that's my fault. I'll probably get 4-5 replies in which you never actually answer MY question. 

i only see one question mark

so i will answer that question

yes i can answer your question.

so stop being a clown.

1 hour ago, scourge165 said:

NOPE!

Can't use the IAEA reports Scout! 

When I used them as a source to show THEY said they Iran WAS following the agreement, you dismissed it, remember?

 

It SOUNDS like you pretty much just believe them when it behooves you and you dismiss their claims when it does not.

Go run back to Twitter and figure out how to reconcile how you can both use the IAEA as a source NOW but dismiss it as a Source in 2018?

 

 

https://www.armscontrol.org/blog/2018-06-08/iaea-report-confirms-irans-compliance-jcpoa?utm_source=chatgpt.com

go ahead, tell us how you can use it from 2018, but discount it now

33 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

So...AGAIN, you'll need to have this argument with the Trump administration who said in 2018 that Iran was upholding their behalf of.... what I guess you believe is an agreement that...doesn't exist? LOL...alright Scout!

did they have 60% at that time. I dont think so .

25 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

Most posters occasionally post a line that could be considered trollish, for instance, this:

Where you revise my statement of comprehension and twist it to meet some imaginary fantasy of your’s that you can manufacture an attack for.  Trollish. 

he is not a troll.

he is a clown who really believes what he says.

16 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

Oh Jesus Jimmy/Scout, are you capable of independent thought?

THEY HAVE BEEN SAYING THIS MY ENTIRE LIFETIME.

 

You claim to be this educated, comfortable, retired...informed person(which...I don't think anyone is buying, at least on the last one). But you're really deferring from our Military Intelligence and deferring to Mossad?

How many times do you fall for this?

They've been claiming this SINCE THE LATE 70's!

But now you just blindly defer to Mossad? Ok, then get rid of Tulsi. She's not doing her job. 

 

-Of course, AGAIN, going back to the original point...it is just purely hypocritical to claim Iran does not follow their obligations when the TRUMP administration said they were in 2018 when they pulled out of the agreement. THAT was my argument and you're just arguing based on what? BOTH Trump administrations are right? Then you must really not believe them at all anymore, right?

https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2011/1108/Imminent-Iran-nuclear-threat-A-timeline-of-warnings-since-1979/Earliest-warnings-1979-84

 

 

 

 

yes

you are a clown.

btw. i am not retired. you really do get mixed up.

why would Iran need 60% ?

22 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Which is what they said at a briefing a year ago, and the year before that, and…..  

According to OUR intelligence agency they are still at the same 60% they have been for years.  

 

I’m sure we can find American officials that agree with Israel.  Like Israel there are American officials that want us to go to war with them.  For some, war is a money machine. 

ok... read the post i just put up.

there is no reason to have anything close to 60%

hmm

did he tell them to F off? 

isreali intel (and we agree) suggested that iran making a bomb was a matter of weeks

which is why isreal was freaking out

one can hope

13 hours ago, scourge165 said:

Oh Lil Jimmy, what's cute is I'M not the one saying they were following the agreement, it was the TRUMP administrations State Department that said they were following the agreement.

You DO know they have several names for it(and even people liking your post know you don't have a clue, you're a dancing monkey). 

really... say that again?

it says here...

he doesn't realize that yes mossad, said they were weeks away, but echoing those sentiments means they agree.

i would rather isreal weaken them so much that the people of Iran can finish the job

21 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

You do realize that you are only looking at it from one perspective only to make it work for your "argument"?  You keep throwing out the "its his 1st amendment right" as if the cop KINEW that this guy sneaking up on his car was just taking pictures.  And using your argument, which is true about taking pictures in public, it's pretty obvious that once the cop KNEW he was in fact only taking pictures he left without arresting the person.  Why do you guys keep conveniently not taking into account that the cop clearly had NO idea what the guy was doing??  You use after the fact information to assume it should have been known in the exact moment...and refuse to look at it from the police's perspective.  

And I am sorry but your family of LEOs would probably be ashamed that you are using them as some sort of "evidence" that "you don't hate cops" and then turnaround and claim that this cop did something wrong while clearly refusing to acknowledge the potential perspective of said cop.  

By the way...how is this a right v left thing??

he has been told this repeatedly.. but he is a clown... so 

come on.. all those were just some guy taking a picture of the license plate

well there definitely is a troll on this forum who SAID he voted for trump..

but it's clear he is a leftist

senators play word games all the time.

On 6/17/2025 at 11:15 PM, GreatWhiteNorth said:

Not even a tiny bit. Did you even bother to click the link for the posts you reposted?

Weak. So pathetically weak. Remember that today and 13 years ago are completely different animals.

so you are saying that liberals didn't want a king?

and that somehow means that Trump is going to try to be  a king? 

he can try i suppose 

they didn't know what he was doing you dolt.

we dont need the guard, and im too busy drinking wine

let the serfs eat cake!!

https://www.city-journal.org/article/los-angeles-riots-california-governor-gavin-newsom-wine