Scouts Honor

Trump voter dies on every democrat hill.

44 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

If he really thought he was in danger, he should have just drove away.  Especially if the vehicle was actually equipped with sirens so that he could easily run the red light.  If the “danger” is on foot and you’re in a running vehicle, getting out of the car seems stupid.  

You can use a gun to defend your property from home invaders.  Not if someone knocks on your door like Andrew Lester did to Ralph Yarl.  So you’re kinda proving my point: crouching behind a car is not remotely comparable to breaking into a home.

hmm the police should have driven away. that doesn't make any sense.

maybe he did something to the car... that would make driving unsafe...

1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

I think the only question that needs to be asked is this: if the officer shot him, would the officer be charged with a crime?

IANAL, but I’d bet yes.

FAFO

1 hour ago, Caveira said:

you have no idea his intent as the police chased him away.    And you are wrong… he did “nothing”.   “Nothing” is not approaching the car crouched in a very suspicious manner.   it is that suspicious af behavior gives reason to be worried wtf is that guy doing in the middle of live traffic right behind my car.   

You are probably one of those that think you shouldn’t be able to use a gun to defend your property in your home from home invaders.  

officer, i just wanted to give you this gun, but didn't want anyone else to see me approaching you...

1 hour ago, 1032004 said:

Lol.

The person did nothing to indicate he posed any danger, despite you stating definitively he was a “violent protester.” 

 

except sneak up on people in a car...

1 hour ago, 1032004 said:

I

He said the lights weren’t on until he was already parked and reaching for something under the seat.

 

To take a picture of the license plate…

the office knew this... 

no.

this is where sneaking up comes in. the officer has no idea what's in this lunatics head.

1 hour ago, Tripnsweep said:

You are aware the judge who made this ruling was appointed in 1986 right? 

so you are saying we need new judges... 

58 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Yeah and some of them even get invited to the White House!

4 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Lol.

The person did nothing to indicate he posed any danger, despite you stating definitively he was a “violent protester.” 

You also implied that it was acceptable for anyone to point a gun at someone crouching behind their car (I tried to get clarification which you have not provided).

My opinion is that no one, law enforcement officers included, should point a gun at someone for crouching behind their car.   

sneaking up on the car.

i wonder what would be the purpose of that?

5 hours ago, uncle bernard said:

Why does that matter? It's not illegal. Should we not hold police officers to a higher standard than random civilians?

now put yourself in the car

On 6/17/2025 at 11:22 PM, GreatWhiteNorth said:

Thanks for that - now we know who owns you and your stooge posts.

um well yes, i am owned by the founding fathers

I owe them everything

every democrat being arrested:

DO YOU KNOW WHO I AM!!??

5 hours ago, Bigbrog said:

How many??

several

6 hours ago, red viking said:

I've spoken several people from middle east, including Iranians. They may not like their leader (I probably hate mine more) but they are pretty much all nice people, hate Israel w a passion, and justifiably dislike us because we back Israel every step of the way. 

Vast majority of people there don't want to force religion on others. 

To deny that that this is a huge factor is pure ignorance. 

so they are much like you, except they are nice people? 

17 hours ago, ionel said:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/built-inside-mountain-hardened-against-100134271.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAAv06HimTN6u-fxMqaM0S5I7LSnYYLUQBK_tnJ7bIoQnr7A21GnN_rAELfEeepDHSE2R41i7IzVkvmivpvz6FLAiQHFUubaDJXUZC_I_-7Mra_p_PFmbSkdZX5RhdsQPs6P9Xa0aw6u0B0zwh2gfOtzjjsQk6izCagIirHLCtIbw

he doesn't know what fordow is

but knows that IRAN followed the 'agreement'

18 hours ago, scourge165 said:

You're playing the clown.

When the US pulled out, there was no longer any deal.

This ALSO started because it was argued BY YOU(with you posting a link well AFTER the US pulled out) that they broke the agreement before the US pulled out.

 

Finally, TRUMP'S State Department sad they were NOT "cheating" before the agreement.

 

I'm not sure what the hell "Fordow" line is, but again, sure it's really clever. 

says the clown who doesn't realize there was never any 'agreement'.

the US heard what it wanted to hear (OBAMA)

and then iran did what it wanted 

i don't disagree with your premise.

act like you have been there before. I would never do this.

but i dont see a problem. but it has been a slippery slope of celebrations

is this the fire extinguisher thing?

she isn't saying anything about anyone else... just that HER shoes were on fire.

a backflip for joy after winning a state championship used to be penalized. then people went crazy.. he just celebrating...

this is really no different...

no he is a terrible actor

i dont hate people who are different than me

i hate the people pushing the 'woke' bull

so if you don't blame trump and dont have a problem

why do you appear to have such a problem? 

take a nap.

somebody dropped charges...

who is NOT blaming trump?

incontinent maybe..