Ban Basketball

That's more of a condemnation of the racist GOP than anything else. But, if course that little nuance would ecscape you.

The obsession continues with Deuce... ... as I keep reminding you and NHS, I'm not as important as you think I am, Deuce. But, I am learning to be flattered by both of your adulation.

Little would you know, the joke's on you (and a few others) with that one, cis pronoun.

Only slightly ironic that someone who thinks cis gender is a pronoun is talking about someone's intellect, eh, friends?

Huh!?

We've communicated many times before.

Seeing who is probably the biggest candyass on earth try to play tough guy cowboy is about as bad as Inmate #PO1135809 trying to play working class hero.

Here's where it's at as of today. Hopefully you can access the article. https://wcfcourier.com/sports/college/uni/wrestling/column-northern-iowa-wrestling-coach-doug-schwab-remains-steely-eyed/article_a5d5f910-5ee0-11ee-a494-2f2b2822883e.html

A laugh is simply an attempt to save face. I welcome them!

I own this very shirt to honor The Running Man.

For those who'd like to see Josh Running Man Hawley at his bad ass best!

Right again, ma'am. See the link. It was Josh Running Man Hawley. You should know something about me. I enjoy posting factual information as a means to try to keep people grounded in reality. The reality is fantasy, and fantasy is reality world that 30% of us live in is alarming to me, and why I post only facts. https://wpde.com/renderer/wpde/amp/news/armstrong-army-strong/dont-believe-that-men-can-get-pregnant-well-you-must-be-transphobic

Well, you sure reply to me often, eh? Funny, I don't recall posting anything that isn't factual, which is precisely why no one refutes me. Post facts and you don't have to worry about being refuted. I'd certainly welcome a for instance, if you can find one.

Nuance goes whoosh over the noggin.

Two things for clarity. One, and as I've told you once before, I'm not a professor by title. Two, " your party." I'm of no specific party, but strongly simply a leftist on nearly all issues. It's more about whom I won't vote for than anything else. Now onto my real reason for replying. You don't need to get drunk and go on a Trump-inspired rant against me because I point out errors or disagree with an idea. I don't hold that kind of hostility toward people that I don't know, which is why I don't reply like that to people on here. As the owner of this place, you follow the works world's worst bidness my by deliberately alienating people from your product. Show a little respect.

Is everything ok at home? Bye, bye, friends.

It's plausible, and it's true enough. Therefore, it's true.

With the nuance that irresponsible "journalists," who exist to deliberately keep you uninformed and angry didn't tell you, she was trying to get Josh Running Man Hawley back on task, rather than talking about trans people in a confirmation hearing. "I'm not a biologist" was to end that stupidity and irrelevance. I'd have done the same.

I actually think that wrestlestat outperforms all of the others. Season's end show it nearly every time.

No, I didn't see it, but, as I said, here's betting that there was nuance there that you weren't informed about. Self edit: I just looked it up, and I do recall. Yes, you were fed disinformation regarding what she actually said.

You'd be surprised but my news sources aren't showing up on your radar. I keep hearing this claim ( men getting pregnant), which Ii don't buy that anyone has said, or, if they "did" someone missed a nuance. The person then sold it to angry and uninformed people. Of course, none of them would think to verify its truthfulness.

What little I follow international wrestling I haven't been able to help but notice over the past few years that every other name at the top is not a Russian any longer.

My favorite relative of his, George Duke.

Awesome, and thank you! My life can now officially go on, knowing that they done showed up them immoralists!

Well, of a recent study that was conducted of all of the major networks, CNN did rate the best in terms of truthfulness and less misleading information. They do have an entire section on their site called Facts First, where they expose false and misleading information. Of course, we ALL know who fared the worst. Almost 2/3rds of their "reporting" is false or misleading. By default then, would you like Biden better if he got near that 30,000 mark? Apparently so.