Wrestleknownothing

How I feel every time I post on indianamat

Welcome. I came over from indianamat too.

Another flaw in this survey is that it is not at all representative of the country. They defined elite based on population density. There is no connection between the two. And there are only 8 metropolitan areas in the US with a population density of 10,000+ per mile. Given that I could find nothing detailed about the methodology, I am sure the methodology is crap.

I am saying the opposite. Unlike offthemat, I took the time to dig up the questions that were asked. And based on the response reported, I am highly skeptical of this survey. As I said multiple times in this thread, anyone who believes that more than 50% of any group, anywhere in the US thinks private A/C should be banned is not thinking critically. Accepting these results at face value is foolish. And foolish is what offthemat does best.

Many points of failure, so they made a point to fail many times. Personally I love them.

Close. Very close. Scott Moore finished fourth for PSU in 2003 and third for Virginia in 2004.

And sorry Jimmy. Iowa does worse in these rankings. The new King of the NCAAs belongs to....Your Missouri Tigers Good news for PSU as they cling to top 10. Sanderson's job is safe for another year.

I will not stand idly by while you besmirch the good name of dorks. I said good day, sir.

At 141 the top 5 were unanimous

Crooham, Woods, Lovett, O'Toole, and Keckeisen were unanimous choices.

D1. I do not have any data outside of D1, unfortunately.

Good to see Brayton Lee back in action.

Cliff Keen. 33 finalists, no team titles. Koll had 23 at Cornell and 2 at Stanford.

Exactly. BTN+ charges a premium price, $15/mo, and then delivers volunteer announcers. Very cynical of BTN.

Got me. I don't know what happened.

I know I did

That is a surprise. But it will be nice to see Haley not splitting votes with DeSantis.

I will say no, but it will be close. Assuming all three win and average four bonus points each they are at 72. I think Iowa gets about 80 - 81 and Missouri around 72 - 73. Could go either way, but I will take the field against those three.

details. I assume you are saying that Pitt was leading the dual by 5 or less, Pitzer was leading the last match, got injured, and rather than gut it out, forfeited, and lost the dual. Is that right?

And never did to those without duck colored glasses.

And it is the height of cynicism to have those announcers on an over-priced streaming service provided by the premier conference for the sport. For $15/month people expect way more than those guys.

1929 - Pinfall, forfeit, default, or DQ worth 1 team point in tournaments 1972 - Superior decision (win by 10+) added and worth 1/2 team point in tournaments 1976 - Superior decision raised to 12+ points and worth 3/4 team point. Major decision added (8 - 11) and worth 1/2 team point in tournaments 1985 - Tech fall (leading by 15+) added and worth 1 team point in tournaments 1988 - Superior decision eliminated and TF team scoring changed to 3/4 point 1995 - Major decision team scoring increased to 1 point. Tech fall eliminated and replaced with Match Termination (leading by 15+) and also worth 1 team point 1995 - Pinfall, forfeit, default, or DQ increased to 2 team points (so from 1985 to 1988 pinfall and tech fall were worth the same) 1997 - Tech fall restored with a back points requirement and worth 1.5 team points. Match termination still exists Somewhere between 1998 and 2001 the match termination began to also be called tech fall, but the distinction between one with near fall and one without near fall remained. I cannot find these rule books online to confirm the year. 2016 - All tech falls worth 1.5 team points (near fall requirement removed) Edit: forgot to include pinfall info

I think they can. There are 6 duals plus 3 B1G matches after MSU. Starocci is at 6 and Brooks is at 7 matches. But do they even need an RPI? They will get an allocation based on coaches' rank and winning%.