Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, Lipdrag said:

With all of his contacts on the Street couldn't the Sec Treas have sweet talked a private firm to do it without taxpayer $$ involved?  While the goal of stability for an emerging ally is laudable I don't think the federal government should be swapping anything for anything.  Swapping is not in the constitution from where I read it.

 

Edit:  I should have read all the posts before posting.  WKN notes 3rd parties are being approached.  My point stands that I object to the US Gov speculating in currencies on principle.  

I think no third party would make the investmemt unless the government went first. You want the government along side for protection. 

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
7 hours ago, Lipdrag said:

With all of his contacts on the Street couldn't the Sec Treas have sweet talked a private firm to do it without taxpayer $$ involved?  While the goal of stability for an emerging ally is laudable I don't think the federal government should be swapping anything for anything.  Swapping is not in the constitution from where I read it.

 

Edit:  I should have read all the posts before posting.  WKN notes 3rd parties are being approached.  My point stands that I object to the US Gov speculating in currencies on principle.  

Maybe because speculating in currencies has ridiculously high risk. Particularly when the currency in question has a history of being notoriously unreliable.

Posted
On 10/14/2025 at 9:30 PM, GreatWhiteNorth said:

Funny I don't recall you railing about getting the Epstein files released. As they should have been by now.

Release the files 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...