Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Do you have evidence to support that they were part of a particular side?  You’re the one that made the initial claim.

Yes.  They are left leaning liberals. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said:

 

Jeremiah Johnson GIFs | Tenor

I’ve never heard of the Wilderness Dispatch before today.  I just think it was a good article.  I’m not forcing you to read it, but no need to trash the source simply for not being well known.  If you have another reason to trash them, please let me know.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Caveira said:

You’re not a serious person if you think the Black Lives Matter protesters were conservatives.  

Oh yes he is. But he’s still young so let’s cut him some slack. 

Its easy to be a non believer when you’re alive but it won’t be when you die. 

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

I’ve never heard of the Wilderness Dispatch before today.  I just think it was a good article.  I’m not forcing you to read it, but no need to trash the source simply for not being well known.  If you have another reason to trash them, please let me know.

Wilderness Dispatch

Ex-GOP conservative, calling out hypocrisy and villainy on both sides.

 

Meanwhile the five (likely more) most recent articles are anti-Trump/anti-Conservative.  I stopped after seeing which direction this "fair minded" individual was going.

Edited by Interviewed_at_Weehawken
Posted
3 minutes ago, Caveira said:

You’re not a serious person if you think the Black Lives Matter protesters were conservatives.  

Holy putting words in peoples mouths Batman.

1) we’re referring to rioters, not protesters.  Two different things and in general were two different groups.

2) I never said they were conservatives:

32 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Irrelevant to the point made. 

And most of the actual damage was likely caused by people that have never voted anyway.
 

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

Holy putting words in peoples mouths Batman.

1) we’re referring to rioters, not protesters.  Two different things and in general were two different groups.

2) I never said they were conservatives:

 

The rioters were far left extremists.  

Posted
2 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Holy putting words in peoples mouths Batman.

1) we’re referring to rioters, not protesters.  Two different things and in general were two different groups.

2) I never said they were conservatives:

 

I know you were very young, but the mainstream media was inferring the rioters were "protestors" as cities were burning in the background.  This literally happened.

  • Fire 1
Posted

1032004 = 10 3 2004 =Oct 10, 2004 

Im not a detective but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express once.  He can try work his way out of it but I’m not buying it. The comments and how he turns and runs when he can’t keep up in an argument give it away.  What do wokesters ask for on their bdays nowadays anyways? 

Its easy to be a non believer when you’re alive but it won’t be when you die. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said:

I know you were very young, but the mainstream media was inferring the rioters were "protestors" as cities were burning in the background.  This literally happened.

And the MSM is often wrong, correct?

Posted
3 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

1032004 = 10 3 2004 =Oct 10, 2004 

Im not a detective but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express once.  He can try work his way out of it but I’m not buying it. The comments and how he turns and runs when he can’t keep up in an argument give it away.  What do wokesters ask for on their bdays nowadays anyways? 

I wrestled 103 in 2004….

Posted
9 minutes ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said:

Wilderness Dispatch

Ex-GOP conservative, calling out hypocrisy and villainy on both sides.

 

Meanwhile the five (likely more) most recent articles are anti-Trump.  I stopped after seeing which direction this "fair minded" individual was going.

Well if he is really ex-GOP that makes him more credible IMO.  Seems like the dude has TDS, but taking a quick look his ire is mostly directed at Trump specifically, so maybe those articles you can take with a grain of salt.  But the Kirk article isn’t really about Trump. 

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

I wrestled 103 in 2004….

Who uses their b day  as their name?  So primitive 

Edited by JimmySpeaks
  • Bob 1

Its easy to be a non believer when you’re alive but it won’t be when you die. 

Posted
Just now, 1032004 said:

Agree.  That’s why I didn’t.

Bottoms up on this next bday huh?

Its easy to be a non believer when you’re alive but it won’t be when you die. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

And the MSM is often wrong, correct?

So you’re denying they were summer “riots” ????? 

Its easy to be a non believer when you’re alive but it won’t be when you die. 

Posted
1 minute ago, JimmySpeaks said:

So you’re denying they were summer “riots” ????? 

I’m saying I wouldn’t call rioters “protesters”

Posted
Just now, 1032004 said:

I’m saying I wouldn’t call rioters “protesters”

So the MPLS gathering was a protest or a riot ?  

Its easy to be a non believer when you’re alive but it won’t be when you die. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

So the MPLS gathering was a protest or a riot ?  

Both, but it was largely 2 different groups participating in each.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...