Conservatives flipping out about a restaurant logo

[1032004]

25 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

You would know. You spend an awful lot of time doing it and then talking about it on a different site. 

Not as much as @Caveira

[Caveira]

6 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Not as much as @Caveira

I rarely if ever count their followers.  I’ve explained to you it’s usually the videos I want.   Usually the ones hard to find on the main stream news or YouTube.

[JimmySpeaks]

1 hour ago, 1032004 said:

Not as much as @Caveira

Whataboutism ….. again 

you continue to complain about Whataboutism while continuing to do it.  Unreal 

[1032004]

1 hour ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Whataboutism ….. again 

you continue to complain about Whataboutism while continuing to do it.  Unreal 

Let’s get back on topic then, do you think the number of conservatives mad at Cracker Barrel is higher or lower than the number of libs mad at American Eagle?

[WrestlingRasta]

1 hour ago, 1032004 said:

Let’s get back on topic then, do you think the number of conservatives mad at Cracker Barrel is higher or lower than the number of libs mad at American Eagle?

There’s literally no way you could substantiate that.  And even bigger picture….on a board full of silly arguments, this one would have to be at the top of the list.   Debating which ‘side’ has more mad people is as dumb as the people getting mad in the first place! 

[Caveira]

4 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

There’s literally no way you could substantiate that.  And even bigger picture….on a board full of silly arguments, this one would have to be at the top of the list.   Debating which ‘side’ has more mad people is as dumb as the people getting mad in the first place! 

I was gonna ask his source for his numbers lol.   

[JimmySpeaks]

1 hour ago, 1032004 said:

Let’s get back on topic then, do you think the number of conservatives mad at Cracker Barrel is higher or lower than the number of libs mad at American Eagle?

There’s no way to know the numbers one way or the other. Sorry. And even though you think the number of followers a social media nobody has actually counts it doesn’t prove any of those followers actually read it and even if they  did that they cared.
 

 That being said a quick google search tells you that when comparing the two events the Sydney Sweeney topic had more severe discussions due to the racial accusations (eugenics) as where the cracker barrel discussions were more around the modern update to the logo.   

This would lead one to believe that there were more undies in a bunch over Sydney than Cracker Barrel   

https://www.google.com/search?q=was+sydney+sweeneys+jeans+ad+more+controversial+than+yhe+changing+if+thr+cracker+barrel+logo&rlz=1C9BKJA_enUS1057US1057&oq=was+sydney+sweeneys+jeans+ad+more+controversial+than+yhe+changing+if+thr+cracker+barrel+logo&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBCTM0MzM4ajBqN6gCGbACAeIDBBgBIF_xBR1rdKZ_F2mx&hl=en-US&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

Edited 6 hours ago by JimmySpeaks

[1032004]

53 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

There’s literally no way you could substantiate that.  And even bigger picture….on a board full of silly arguments, this one would have to be at the top of the list.   Debating which ‘side’ has more mad people is as dumb as the people getting mad in the first place! 

It’s obviously not an exact science and I know you don’t like x, but I would start by challenging people to find an x post with more likes than this one below which is at 90k+ (an actual post complaining about AE/Sweeney, not one making fun of the people that were mad about AE/Sweeney).  I know earlier I’ve focused on the number of followers of the people saying it, but in response to the post from @JimmySpeaks above, people “liking” it shows they “care.”

 

 

 

[JimmySpeaks]

6 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

It’s obviously not an exact science and I know you don’t like x, but I would start by challenging people to find an x post with more likes than this one below which is at 90k+ (an actual post complaining about AE/Sweeney, not one making fun of the people that were mad about AE/Sweeney).  I know earlier I’ve focused on the number of followers of the people saying it, but in response to the post from @JimmySpeaks above, people “liking” it shows they “care.”

 

 

 

Since you’re so sure you know list the actual number for both sides.  

[1032004]

3 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Since you’re so sure you know list the actual number for both sides.  

I don’t know the number.  But I challenge you to find an x post complaining about AE/Sydney Sweeney with more likes than that.

[JimmySpeaks]

5 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

I don’t know the number.  But I challenge you to find an x post complaining about AE/Sydney Sweeney with more likes than that.

So stop acting like you do know the number. And Sorry I don’t do X anymore.  Too many nobodies on both sides there.   But YOU already know that because you’re there all the time.  

Edited 5 hours ago by JimmySpeaks

[JimmySpeaks]

@1032004 care to comment on the Google search about both events? 

[1032004]

1 hour ago, JimmySpeaks said:

There’s no way to know the numbers one way or the other. Sorry. And even though you think the number of followers a social media nobody has actually counts it doesn’t prove any of those followers actually read it and even if they  did that they cared.
 

 That being said a quick google search tells you that when comparing the two events the Sydney Sweeney topic had more severe discussions due to the racial accusations (eugenics) as where the cracker barrel discussions were more around the modern update to the logo.   

This would lead one to believe that there were more undies in a bunch over Sydney than Cracker Barrel   

https://www.google.com/search?q=was+sydney+sweeneys+jeans+ad+more+controversial+than+yhe+changing+if+thr+cracker+barrel+logo&rlz=1C9BKJA_enUS1057US1057&oq=was+sydney+sweeneys+jeans+ad+more+controversial+than+yhe+changing+if+thr+cracker+barrel+logo&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBCTM0MzM4ajBqN6gCGbACAeIDBBgBIF_xBR1rdKZ_F2mx&hl=en-US&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

lol you definitely copied that answer from AI.

Which was “more controversial” is different than which were more people complaining about.  Yes, on the whole the people that actually complained about the jeans ad probably thought it was more serious. 

But while I don’t know the exact number, I feel pretty confident in saying that less people were actually complaining about that than the Cracker Barrel rebrand.    Probably 90% of the conversation I saw about Sydney Sweeney was just conservatives making fun of nobodies on TikTok.  But those same conservatives are doing the actual complaining about Cracker Barrel.  Yes, maybe they’re just the loudest in general, but that’s why I think the number of likes is an indicator as well.

[WrestlingRasta]

I guess hitting a like button = I’M MAD!!!!!

[1032004]

2 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

I guess hitting a like button = I’M MAD!!!!!

No, that’s why I just said “an indicator,” but it generally means they agree with the sentiment IMO.

[WrestlingRasta]

4 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

No, that’s why I just said “an indicator,” but it generally means they agree with the sentiment IMO.

I’m just glad we have good earnest people like yourself working hard to investigate this crucial matter.  I hope others will take you up on your ‘challenge’.  
 

Sleep well. 

[1032004]

Just now, WrestlingRasta said:

I’m just glad we have good earnest people like yourself working hard to investigate this crucial matter.  I hope others will take you up on your ‘challenge’.  
 

Sleep well. 

I know it’s not crucial, I mostly just find the hypocrisy from many conservatives interesting, since it was only a couple weeks ago that they were accusing “the left” of “melting down” about a jeans ad, but now they’re doing the same thing about a restaurant logo (and IMO the conservatives are doing it in much larger numbers, although obviously it’s not all of them).

[JimmySpeaks]

28 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

lol you definitely copied that answer from AI.

Which was “more controversial” is different than which were more people complaining about.  Yes, on the whole the people that actually complained about the jeans ad probably thought it was more serious. 

But while I don’t know the exact number, I feel pretty confident in saying that less people were actually complaining about that than the Cracker Barrel rebrand.    Probably 90% of the conversation I saw about Sydney Sweeney was just conservatives making fun of nobodies on TikTok.  But those same conservatives are doing the actual complaining about Cracker Barrel.  Yes, maybe they’re just the loudest in general, but that’s why I think the number of likes is an indicator as well.

I copied nothing. Just posted it.  That you saw doesn’t mean that’s what everyone else saw. Good grief. 

[JimmySpeaks]

15 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

I know it’s not crucial, I mostly just find the hypocrisy from many conservatives interesting, since it was only a couple weeks ago that they were accusing “the left” of “melting down” about a jeans ad, but now they’re doing the same thing about a restaurant logo (and IMO the conservatives are doing it in much larger numbers, although obviously it’s not all of them).

You started this thread because you were mad that the Sydney Sweeney thread was booming because it was all over the MSM on all outlets and EVERYONE was discussing it.  You continue to complain about Whataboutism while doing it over and over and over again.   The fact that this thread hasn’t reached four pages should tell you something about which situation was a bigger deal on both sides.  

[1032004]

10 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

You started this thread because you were mad that the Sydney Sweeney thread was booming because it was all over the MSM on all outlets and EVERYONE was discussing it.  You continue to complain about Whataboutism while doing it over and over and over again.   The fact that this thread hasn’t reached four pages should tell you something about which situation was a bigger deal on both sides.  

It’s conservatives doing the majority of the talking in both situations…. Yes I’m not surprised they’d rather make fun of a few random libs than about a restaurant.

Edited 3 hours ago by 1032004

[Husker_Du]

yeah, i think it's much ado about nothing.

however, one thing is undeniable - art, architecture, and design have become utterly devoid of real identity or character. 

i think this instance drives that home more than any other.

there's been countless articles on this topic over the last decade or so. 

[Caveira]

4 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

It’s conservatives doing the majority of the talking in both situations…. Yes I’m not surprised they’d rather make fun of a few random libs than about a restaurant.

Your gonna cite your numbers again or nah?

[Caveira]

7 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

It’s conservatives doing the majority of the talking in both situations…. Yes I’m not surprised they’d rather make fun of a few random libs than about a restaurant.

We’re leaving twitter !!!!!!!!   I don’t see liberals on it as much !!!!!!!!    Elon is Hitler !!!

how many times have almost every lefty on here in their own slightly smug-ish tone say I am to good for tik tok.   I don’t have a twitter account.  I don’t social media.    Countless times boss.    Now your counting likes as your means and posting endlessly about which stupid topic is more popular than the other one.

The reality is.   The human on this board with their panties in a bunch the most over this.    —->    Is you.  

 

Democrats' exodus from X to BlueSky is a journey of self-delusion | Opinion

Democrats think they can retreat to safe spaces after the 2024 election. They should stand up for free speech like classical liberals instead.

Denial is a river you can watch in real time.

At the moment it flows from social platform X, formerly known as Twitter, to social platform BlueSky, otherwise known as utopia.

In one sanctimonious declaration after another, Democrats are registering their disgust for the people they blame most for losing the 2024 presidential election.

So, Democrats are making their exodus from Platform X, whose owner they despise and whose users they deplore.

Elon Musk is not merely the richest man in the world and the guy who bought Twitter. He is now a member of Republican “Team Unity” that is returning Donald Trump to the White House.

Democrats won’t tolerate heresy like that, so there must be separation from the rabble, from the larger swath of America that voted one more time for Trump. 

The Democrats will take their moral certitude to a social media domain more serene and high-minded, more controlled. A veritable heaven on earth.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[WrestlingRasta]

51 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

I know it’s not crucial, I mostly just find the hypocrisy from many conservatives interesting, since it was only a couple weeks ago that they were accusing “the left” of “melting down” about a jeans ad, but now they’re doing the same thing about a restaurant logo (and IMO the conservatives are doing it in much larger numbers, although obviously it’s not all of them).

Well welcome to a message board where hypocrisy, from both sides, runs pretty fluid…you don’t need to research twitter to figure that out. 

[JimmySpeaks]

28 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

It’s conservatives doing the majority of the talking in both situations…. Yes I’m not surprised they’d rather make fun of a few random libs than about a restaurant.

Again show your work er proof. Oh wait.