"Well, we are all going to die."

[El Luchador]

Just now, scourge165 said:

Oh... just a "whole bunch of out of context and straight up misleading quotes," without actually telling me which one.

 

I don't think I actually quoted anything so much as articulated the threat Trump has made against the media, the "Enemy of the people," unless they're "nice to him. 

But again, good thing YOUR side never tries to silence anyone! 

 

Be a big boy and tell me what is out of context?

Check the material included within quotation marks in your original post I responded to.  Those would be the ones. How hard is that?

[scourge165]

13 minutes ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

And then you go and commit an actual strawman fallacy.

YAHTZEE!

You ever see Bill Burr's "how to argue argue with women?"

 

Stay on the topic, don't deviate from the topic. The topic... the claim was made that "my side," which in this context was the right, isn't trying to silence anyone. 

 

When they have to start changing the topic or moving the argument, you know THEY know they lied. So that's it. The ONLY point of contention until they admit... they're clowns and Trump has REGULARLY threatened Journalists for reporting things he does not like...jailing them, he's called them the enemy of the people. 

 

Watch them flail badly trying a 'whataboutism' or trying to do anything but address Trump literally trying to threaten and intimidate voices of dissent. 

[Saylors_Tiny_Willie]

9 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

So your saying that labeling me as a dropout and as someone living paycheck to paycheck isn't stawmaning? You have no idea who I am but have created a persona of me to fit your so called argument.  You literally made a strawman out of me. 

Try reading the link included above.

Words mean things.


The super duper advanced word you're spasmodically trying and failing to come up with is 'caricature'. You're welcome.

Edited June 1 by Saylors_Tiny_Willie

[Saylors_Tiny_Willie]

4 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

Your over simplistic representation is wrong to the point of being fraudulent. 

Once again, you should have stayed in school.

[scourge165]

4 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

Your over simplistic representation is wrong to the point of being fraudulent. 

And the argument is now basically... 'nuh-uh.' 

 

It's ok. I didn't expect you to articulate how you were wrong. 

[El Luchador]

Just now, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

Once again, you should have stayed in school.

So stating something as a fact that isn't accurate or even known to you to draw a conclusion that isn't represented by actual facts isn't a form of stawmanning? It just regular dishonesty then. OK have it you way.

[Saylors_Tiny_Willie]

1 minute ago, El Luchador said:

So stating something as a fact that isn't accurate or even known to you to draw a conclusion that isn't represented by actual facts isn't a form of stawmanning? It just regular dishonesty then. OK have it you way.

You type like you're in the midst of an ischemic stroke event.

[scourge165]

5 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

Check the material included within quotation marks in your original post I responded to.  Those would be the ones. How hard is that?

LOL...I must have missed the "material" included within quotation marks in my original post.

Why don't you cite for me which one of those is "over simplistic representation is wrong to the point of being fraudulent?"

 

You can't, all you can do is say, 'no....you bad.' 

 

Which is sad and painful to watch, but I'm not moving off this point until you either tell me how it's "over simplistic," or "fraudulent."

[El Luchador]

2 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

And the argument is now basically... 'nuh-uh.' 

 

It's ok. I didn't expect you to articulate how you were wrong. 

OK, I'll make it simple. It's not that he doesn't like it, it that it's dishonest.  The devil is in the details you left out to draw an improper conclusions.  It's leftism 101. People are smart to it. That's why MSM is dying.  That and Trump pulled their USAID kickback money and they can't survive in a true market. 

[El Luchador]

1 minute ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

You type like you're in the midst of an ischemic stroke event.

I'm doing this from a phone and adds keep blocking my window. That and I'm wearing my wife's glasses. 

[El Luchador]

9 minutes ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

Once again, you should have stayed in school.

Again you said nothing.  Insults really don't add legitimacy to your opinion.

[scourge165]

2 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

OK, I'll make it simple. It's not that he doesn't like it, it that it's dishonest.  The devil is in the details you left out to draw an improper conclusions.  It's leftism 101. People are smart to it. That's why MSM is dying.  That and Trump pulled their USAID kickback money and they can't survive in a true market. 

Ok, still not addressing any of the direct claims I made and somehow making this about USAID...

Not going to fall for it. These commends predate USAID. Nice try and pivoting, but we're staying on topic here. 

 

Point-"Your side" would NEVER try and sensor someone.

Me-Pointing out Trump suing media Platforms, threatening to jail them, threatening to cut their licenses. 

 

Not moving on to USAID, this is about YOUR claim the right would never do that. You're just throwing out nonsensical lines. "The devils in the details." Yup. And the details are he has said Journalists should be imprisoned. 

Devils in the Details, the detail is he's suing a News Paper because he didn't like a poll before the election. 

 

You're right, the devil is in the details while you offer up just vague nonsense. 

[El Luchador]

1 minute ago, scourge165 said:

Ok, still not addressing any of the direct claims I made and somehow making this about USAID...

Not going to fall for it. These commends predate USAID. Nice try and pivoting, but we're staying on topic here. 

 

Point-"Your side" would NEVER try and sensor someone.

Me-Pointing out Trump suing media Platforms, threatening to jail them, threatening to cut their licenses. 

 

Not moving on to USAID, this is about YOUR claim the right would never do that. You're just throwing out nonsensical lines. "The devils in the details." Yup. And the details are he has said Journalists should be imprisoned. 

Devils in the Details, the detail is he's suing a News Paper because he didn't like a poll before the election. 

 

You're right, the devil is in the details while you offer up just vague nonsense. 

You stating it as a complete fact doesn't make it one.

[JimmySpeaks]

3 hours ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

You know only what you've been told to know by people who don't have your best interest at heart.

You parrot the party line without introspection nor curiosity, spewing up the pablum you were so carefully spoonfed.

You may as well have said this to yourself in the mirror 

[El Luchador]

11 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

LOL...I must have missed the "material" included within quotation marks in my original post.

Why don't you cite for me which one of those is "over simplistic representation is wrong to the point of being fraudulent?"

 

You can't, all you can do is say, 'no....you bad.' 

 

Which is sad and painful to watch, but I'm not moving off this point until you either tell me how it's "over simplistic," or "fraudulent."

For as much as you like to insult me as being uneducated you compression skills leave much to be desired. 

[scourge165]

2 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

You stating it as a complete fact doesn't make it one.

LOL...ok, so now after two pages, we're just denying...everything?

What exactly are you disputing?

[scourge165]

Just now, El Luchador said:

For as much as you like to insult me as being uneducated you compression skills leave much to be desired. 

Where did I make a comment on your education?

Actually....scratch that. I just want an answer to the last question. Which of the things I pointed out that Trump has said or threatened the media with are false?

I know you're waiting for someone else to come in here and try and change the argument for you, but...lets stay on topic. You said your side doesn't ever try and silence anyone, doesn't try and censor them.

I'd say jailing reporters, revoking licenses, suing Newspapers is doing exactly that. 

 

I'll wait for your next deflection. 

[JimmySpeaks]

21 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

And the argument is now basically... 'nuh-uh.' 

 

It's ok. I didn't expect you to articulate how you were wrong. 

Like you always do.  Oh wait you’re never wrong.   

[JimmySpeaks]

5 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

For as much as you like to insult me as being uneducated you compression skills leave much to be desired. 

Lil wiener Willie  has nothing but insults. 

[JimmySpeaks]

I guess The left doesn’t understand and/or like karma.  Ignore it when they do it bitch about it when the right does what they did. 

[JimmySpeaks]

 Scrooge when I come around.  Priceless. 

[El Luchador]

27 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

LOL...I must have missed the "material" included within quotation marks in my original post.

Why don't you cite for me which one of those is "over simplistic representation is wrong to the point of being fraudulent?"

 

You can't, all you can do is say, 'no....you bad.' 

 

Which is sad and painful to watch, but I'm not moving off this point until you either tell me how it's "over simplistic," or "fraudulent."

Let's start with you actually showing the details of the lawsuit that states I Donald Trump don't like the poll so I'm suing.  It's actually a moronic statement. 

[scourge165]

4 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

Let's start with you actually showing the details of the lawsuit that states I Donald Trump don't like the poll so I'm suing.  It's actually a moronic statement. 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdjg2n3xv7zo

 

I'll note the case was thrown out. 

Now would you like to go on to Trump talking about throwing Journalists in Jail, revoking credentials and or broadcast licenses?

[El Luchador]

2 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdjg2n3xv7zo

 

I'll note the case was thrown out. 

Now would you like to go on to Trump talking about throwing Journalists in Jail, revoking credentials and or broadcast licenses?

You must have posted the wrong story.  That was about a fraudulent poll used as election interference.  So I've yet to see evidence of your claim.

[scourge165]

2 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

You must have posted the wrong story.  That was about a fraudulent poll used as election interference.  So I've yet to see evidence of your claim.

LMFAO!!!

 

Yeah, Trump saying so doesn't make it so... and that's why his lawsuit was thrown out. 

 

Quote

Additionally, a federal judge recently ruled that Trump improperly added two Iowa politicians to the lawsuit in an attempt to keep the case in state court, a move seen as an effort to manipulate jurisdiction .

 

Edited June 1 by scourge165