Moodys Downgrades U.S. Credit Rating

[red viking]

23 minutes ago, Caveira said:

I think he’s a bad guy.   And a pos zillionaire who didn’t donate to charity.   What say you about this mega democrat not being charitable?   All the while asking us to be more charitable with our $$$ via taxes he raised ?

Taxes are better than charity. Charity doesn't accomplish nearly as much. Never has and never will. 

[Scouts Honor]

1 hour ago, red viking said:

Oh I get it. So wingers can cheat on their taxes but liberals can't? 

hypocrisy something something

[Scouts Honor]

14 minutes ago, red viking said:

Taxes are better than charity. Charity doesn't accomplish nearly as much. Never has and never will. 

omg you really are a fool 

[JimmySpeaks]

More taxes = More waste 

[red viking]

10 yr yield 4.62%.

LETS GO!!!!!!

5% if senate passes the "big beautiful deficit bill."

Edited 10 hours ago by red viking

[Lipdrag]

 

https://babylonbee.com/news/report-congress-split-between-those-who-want-to-spend-a-ridiculous-amount-and-those-who-want-to-spend-an-even-more-ridiculous-amount

[red viking]

12 minutes ago, Lipdrag said:

 

https://babylonbee.com/news/report-congress-split-between-those-who-want-to-spend-a-ridiculous-amount-and-those-who-want-to-spend-an-even-more-ridiculous-amount

Yup. Zero cuts to ANY big programs. In fact, were jacking up military spending big time. That's only half the problem though. The other half is massive tax cuts. 

 

Edited 10 hours ago by red viking

[Bigbrog]

11 hours ago, red viking said:

Taxes are better than charity. Charity doesn't accomplish nearly as much. Never has and never will. 

We have a new winner for the most ridiculous claim by RV...keep it going kid!!

[Saylors_Tiny_Willie]

[red viking]

5 hours ago, Bigbrog said:

We have a new winner for the most ridiculous claim by RV...keep it going kid!!

Charity won't go very far in taking care of the poor. Doesn't come remotely close. 

[Bigbrog]

1 minute ago, red viking said:

Charity won't go very far in taking care of the poor. Doesn't come remotely close. 

Prove it!!

[red viking]

Just now, Bigbrog said:

Prove it!!

Never has. That's the proof. 

[Bigbrog]

2 minutes ago, red viking said:

Never has. That's the proof. 

So as with everything you ever claim on here, you can't prove it and are wrong!

[red viking]

4 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

So as with everything you ever claim on here, you can't prove it and are wrong!

All the nation's in world history w lowest poverty rates had higher tax rates. Look at the data. 

[Bigbrog]

3 minutes ago, red viking said:

All the nation's in world history w lowest poverty rates had higher tax rates. Look at the data. 

So you extrapolate that out to be "private donations to charity don't do anything"??    Once again you show your true analytical powers...yeah that's it..."powers".  

[red viking]

1 minute ago, Bigbrog said:

So you extrapolate that out to be "private donations to charity don't do anything"??    Once again you show your true analytical powers...yeah that's it..."powers".  

Just not as much as a strong tax system. Read. 

[Bigbrog]

1 minute ago, red viking said:

Just not as much as a strong tax system. Read. 

PROVE IT!!

[red viking]

1 minute ago, Bigbrog said:

PROVE IT!!

Look at poverty rates of nations w strong taxes vs weak vs poverty rates. It's very simple. 

[Bigbrog]

2 minutes ago, red viking said:

Look at poverty rates of nations w strong taxes vs weak vs poverty rates. It's very simple. 

LOL...what does that have to do with charitable contributions?  Maybe this question will help with your "analysis" and subsequent "conclusion"...are the charitable contributions the same in nations with "strong taxes" (whatever that means) versus "weak taxes" (again whatever that means)??

[red viking]

1 hour ago, Bigbrog said:

LOL...what does that have to do with charitable contributions?  Maybe this question will help with your "analysis" and subsequent "conclusion"...are the charitable contributions the same in nations with "strong taxes" (whatever that means) versus "weak taxes" (again whatever that means)??

Charity is great but it doesn't meet the needs of the poor. Never has. Poverty is very high in nations w o safety nets and they are generally corrupt sewage holes. 

Edited 2 hours ago by red viking

[Scouts Honor]

1 hour ago, red viking said:

Charity won't go very far in taking care of the poor. Doesn't come remotely close. 

the govt hasn't changed anything

the great society started in the 60's...

look how far we have come

[Scouts Honor]

never heard of the red cross or the united way

or st judes

[red viking]

34 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

never heard of the red cross or the united way

or st judes

They can't come remotely close to meeting all needs. Never have. 

[Scouts Honor]

14 minutes ago, red viking said:

They can't come remotely close to meeting all needs. Never have. 

the govt has? 

[red viking]

23 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

the govt has? 

Closer. Yes. By orders of magnitude. Can charity do what social security does? Not even close.