Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
18 minutes ago, red viking said:

How are they supposed to "combat spying?" That's ridiculous because it's rarely obvious. 

REPORT IT....as Stanford JUST did. That's one way...but then you don't believe that.

You have Universities studying things like defense technologies or AI, Robotics, Biological and Chemical Weapon research and you're saying they shouldn't be expected to do ANYTHING because...well gosh, it's hard. 

That's...insane. 

 

At the VERY least, you can communicate to students how they may be approached, what to do in the event that they are, monitor ALL access to restricted areas.

 

But I mean, if it's too hard, then you don't get funding to study those topics. We lose some of the brightest young minds because we can't keep our sh!t together...? That a good alternative? 

Johns Hopkins, MIT, Harvard, they just don't study those sensitive topics any longer. 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Caveira said:

That d senator banged that Chinese spy for 5 years while cheating on his wife and on the intelligence committee.     “Self reported” lol 

I must not know who you're talking about in this case.

Who "banged" a Chinese spy for 5 years? 

 

I assumed you were talking about Swalwell who...I don't actually think banged anyone, but clearly you're not. 

 

I can't even IMAGINE how outraged you are about the ~10 people who worked for Trump who were convicted of working for foreign Governments while advising him. That must have you OUTRAGED, right?

I'm SURE I missed where you expressed your outraged over Trump's association with Manafort, Gates, Flynn, Barrack(just struck a deal with their buddies and he got back that nice plane in return)...Broidy, Bennett, Watts...(I'm sure you know the rest)... right? 

Because what an incredible fraud you'd be otherwise, right?

Posted
2 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

I must not know who you're talking about in this case.

Who "banged" a Chinese spy for 5 years? 

 

I assumed you were talking about Swalwell who...I don't actually think banged anyone, but clearly you're not. 

 

I can't even IMAGINE how outraged you are about the ~10 people who worked for Trump who were convicted of working for foreign Governments while advising him. That must have you OUTRAGED, right?

I'm SURE I missed where you expressed your outraged over Trump's association with Manafort, Gates, Flynn, Barrack(just struck a deal with their buddies and he got back that nice plane in return)...Broidy, Bennett, Watts...(I'm sure you know the rest)... right? 

Because what an incredible fraud you'd be otherwise, right?

If Swallowell didn’t bang Fang Fang he’d say that.  He has yet to deny it. 

Posted
1 minute ago, JimmySpeaks said:

If Swallowell didn’t bang Fang Fang he’d say that.  He has yet to deny it. 

Ok...so "Swallowell" is the "D sen" you were talking about?

Yeah, he's not a Senator and he has denied having an affair...you moron. 


You never fail to expose how...comically ignorant you are. 

 

But good to know. The SENATOR you're talking about is...not a Senator at all and your entire rationale is built on something just objectively false. Very on par for Jimmy. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

Ok...so "Swallowell" is the "D sen" you were talking about?

Yeah, he's not a Senator and he has denied having an affair...you moron. 


You never fail to expose how...comically ignorant you are. 

 

But good to know. The SENATOR you're talking about is...not a Senator at all and your entire rationale is built on something just objectively false. Very on par for Jimmy. 

Hey Scrooge, show me where I said he was a senator.  I’ll wait patiently while you look stupid. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

Ok...so "Swallowell" is the "D sen" you were talking about?

Yeah, he's not a Senator and he has denied having an affair...you moron. 


You never fail to expose how...comically ignorant you are. 

 

But good to know. The SENATOR you're talking about is...not a Senator at all and your entire rationale is built on something just objectively false. Very on par for Jimmy. 

Maybe direct your anger towards the right person dip $hit 

Posted
13 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

Ok...so "Swallowell" is the "D sen" you were talking about?

Yeah, he's not a Senator and he has denied having an affair...you moron. 


You never fail to expose how...comically ignorant you are. 

 

But good to know. The SENATOR you're talking about is...not a Senator at all and your entire rationale is built on something just objectively false. Very on par for Jimmy. 

I’ll wait for YOUR APOLOGY. Put the bottle down 

Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

Ok...so "Swallowell" is the "D sen" you were talking about?

Yeah, he's not a Senator and he has denied having an affair...you moron. 


You never fail to expose how...comically ignorant you are. 

 

But good to know. The SENATOR you're talking about is...not a Senator at all and your entire rationale is built on something just objectively false. Very on par for Jimmy. 

Yes. I didn’t google the d government official to determine if he was senate or house.  It doesn’t really matter.   It still happened.   And happened  while China was paying the Bidens 8 figures….. so whatever on that 

I’m sure this guy gave up no secrets 

served on the United States House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence during his second term, and he was the ranking member of its Central Intelligence Agency Subcommittee. He also chaired the Intelligence Modernization and Readiness Subcommittee

Edited by Caveira
  • Fire 1
  • Clown 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

Ok...so "Swallowell" is the "D sen" you were talking about?

Yeah, he's not a Senator and he has denied having an affair...you moron. 


You never fail to expose how...comically ignorant you are. 

 

But good to know. The SENATOR you're talking about is...not a Senator at all and your entire rationale is built on something just objectively false. Very on par for Jimmy. 

You waited to pounce then fuc$&d it up. Good try though smart guy. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Yes. I didn’t google the d government official to determine if he was senate or house.  It doesn’t really matter.   It still happened.   And happened  while China was paying the Bidens 8 figures….. so whatever on that 

I’m sure this guy gave up no secrets 

 

Ok...well...then you seem to agree with the House oversight committee. 

 

Again though, can I see your posts about all of the people who worked in the Trump administration or for the Trump Campaign who were being paid by foreign Governments and lying about it? 

I mean, I can't even FATHOM how outraged you are about the...well, the list I just gave you that you apparently ignored. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

Ok...so "Swallowell" is the "D sen" you were talking about?

Yeah, he's not a Senator and he has denied having an affair...you moron. 


You never fail to expose how...comically ignorant you are. 

 

But good to know. The SENATOR you're talking about is...not a Senator at all and your entire rationale is built on something just objectively false. Very on par for Jimmy. 

https://www.businessinsider.nl/rep-eric-swalwell-refused-to-say-if-he-had-sex-with-a-suspected-chinese-spy-who-slept-with-2-mayors-for-an-intelligence-campaign/
 

 

but but but he denied it right??!! 

Posted
25 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

Ok...so "Swallowell" is the "D sen" you were talking about?

Yeah, he's not a Senator and he has denied having an affair...you moron. 


You never fail to expose how...comically ignorant you are. 

 

But good to know. The SENATOR you're talking about is...not a Senator at all and your entire rationale is built on something just objectively false. Very on par for Jimmy. 

Wow Scrooge is mad. 

Posted
26 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

Ok...so "Swallowell" is the "D sen" you were talking about?

Yeah, he's not a Senator and he has denied having an affair...you moron. 


You never fail to expose how...comically ignorant you are. 

 

But good to know. The SENATOR you're talking about is...not a Senator at all and your entire rationale is built on something just objectively false. Very on par for Jimmy. 

But but but I’m Scrooge and I’m always right 

Posted
28 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

Ok...so "Swallowell" is the "D sen" you were talking about?

Yeah, he's not a Senator and he has denied having an affair...you moron. 


You never fail to expose how...comically ignorant you are. 

 

But good to know. The SENATOR you're talking about is...not a Senator at all and your entire rationale is built on something just objectively false. Very on par for Jimmy. 

I’m the moron huh??!!  Bahahahahahahhaahha who’s comically ignorant???  That b u.  Very par for the Scrooge. 

Posted
40 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

Ok...so "Swallowell" is the "D sen" you were talking about?

Yeah, he's not a Senator and he has denied having an affair...you moron. 


You never fail to expose how...comically ignorant you are. 

 

But good to know. The SENATOR you're talking about is...not a Senator at all and your entire rationale is built on something just objectively false. Very on par for Jimmy. 

Dont you hate when your anger made you reply to someone that wasn’t the right person and you look completely stupid?  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...