Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Because it’s an 80/20 issue that Dems wanted to die on the hill for and it cost them. 

It's a trivial bs issue for a President to get involved with. But yah, the wingers had a great strategy to make this out to be the greatest crisis in the history of thr country. 

Very few if any were "dying on the hill" though so that's another winger lie 

Edited by red viking
Posted
34 minutes ago, red viking said:

It's a trivial bs issue for a President to get involved with. But yah, the wingers had a great strategy to make this out to be the greatest crisis in the history of thr country. 

Very few if any were "dying on the hill" though so that's another winger lie 

It’s an issue that got him votes.   It’s sort of how elections work.

Posted
1 hour ago, red viking said:

It's a trivial bs issue for a President to get involved with. But yah, the wingers had a great strategy to make this out to be the greatest crisis in the history of thr country. 

Very few if any were "dying on the hill" though so that's another winger lie 

I was wondering if you have any daughters? I have 4 daughters and 9 granddaughters. I see it as the difference between right and wrong. I hope people voted because it was the right thing to do.

  • Bob 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Tripnsweep said:

 

FB_IMG_1742534166784.jpg

Illegal immigration’s was at its worst in American history during his reign.  He spent 3.5 years saying it was not a thing.   He chanted his tune when he realized it was costing him the next election.  You can’t not see that.  

  • Bob 4
Posted

2024-01-18-new-data-reveal-worsening-magnitude-of-the-biden-border-crisis-and-lack-of-interior-immigration-enforcement.pdf

But migrants are not being flown into the U.S. randomly. Under a Biden policy in effect since January 2023, up to 30,000 people from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela can enter the country monthly if they apply online with a financial sponsor and arrive at a specified airport, paying their own way. Biden exercised his “parole” authority, which, under a 1952 law, allows him to admit people “only on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit.”

sounds like he flew them into the country... and even created a policy to do so.

 

  • Bob 1
  • Fire 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

2024-01-18-new-data-reveal-worsening-magnitude-of-the-biden-border-crisis-and-lack-of-interior-immigration-enforcement.pdf

But migrants are not being flown into the U.S. randomly. Under a Biden policy in effect since January 2023, up to 30,000 people from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela can enter the country monthly if they apply online with a financial sponsor and arrive at a specified airport, paying their own way. Biden exercised his “parole” authority, which, under a 1952 law, allows him to admit people “only on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit.”

sounds like he flew them into the country... and even created a policy to do so.

 

Sounds like they had to meet certain criteria and were seeking asylum. Which is legal immigration. 

Do you get tired of lying?

Posted
5 minutes ago, Tripnsweep said:

Sounds like they had to meet certain criteria and were seeking asylum. Which is legal immigration. 

Do you get tired of lying?

so you agree, meeting certain criteria, those people can be just as easily kicked out? 

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Paul158 said:

I was wondering if you have any daughters? I have 4 daughters and 9 granddaughters. I see it as the difference between right and wrong. I hope people voted because it was the right thing to do.

Yes I do. I'm WAY more concerned about their God given rights being removed, such as the right over their own body if they are raped, than the horrifying consequences of the 1 in 1,000 chance that a transgender participates in one of their sporting events. 

It's an insult to God, Grndat and common sense when wingers say they care about women's rights just because they want to kick trannys out of women's sports. 

Edited by red viking
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

god given right to privacy? 

 

To control over their bodies. Privacy is a God given right in some situations but not always. Why change the subject?

Edited by red viking
Posted
28 minutes ago, Tripnsweep said:

Sounds like they had to meet certain criteria and were seeking asylum. Which is legal immigration. 

Do you get tired of lying?

Sure.  lol sounds like that.   As Mr Forman in that 70s show used to say.  You’re a dumb azz if you believe that. 

Posted
22 minutes ago, red viking said:

Yes I do. I'm WAY more concerned about their God given rights being removed, such as the right over their own body if they are raped, than the horrifying consequences of the 1 in 1,000 chance that a transgender participates in one of their sporting events. 

It's an insult to God, Grndat and common sense when wingers say they care about women's rights just because they want to kick trannys out of women's sports. 

There are already anti rape laws.  That’s already covered no need to worry about that.  
 

grndat is something your crazy mind made up.   

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...