Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Here's some results... 133 SF find 4th Kai Orine NC St winning over the 1st seed Ethan Oakley NCar 6-2 and he'll be going up against #2 seed Connor McGonagle of Va.Tech who dec. #3 seed Tyler Knox of Stanford 1-0.

D3

Edited by D3 for LU

Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Posted

125 has #1 seed Eddie Ventresca in the finals as he won over #4 seed Nick Babin of Pitt 19-5

Also in the 125 finals will be #2 seed Vin Robinson of NC St w/ his win over #3 seed Spender Moore of NCar.

D3

Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Posted (edited)
  On 3/9/2025 at 6:52 PM, 1032004 said:

Hipolito vs Cholokyan on Mat 1 now, could be fireworks 

Expand  

I'm a fan of Stanford's Cholokyan... his style IS explosive.

(Unfortunately he's behind 10-3 in the 3rd...)

D3 

Edited by D3 for LU

Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Posted
  On 3/9/2025 at 6:38 PM, D3 for LU said:

125 has #1 seed Eddie Ventresca in the finals as he won over #4 seed Nick Babin of Pitt 19-5

Also in the 125 finals will be #2 seed Vin Robinson of NC St w/ his win over #3 seed Spender Moore of NCar.

D3

Expand  

Ventresca looks old enough to be Alex Marinelli's dad.

Posted
  On 3/10/2025 at 1:44 AM, Pinnacle said:

That was a td for Ventresca imo. Glad they changed it.

Expand  

Agree.  Is this same as B10 where when they review it on their own it’s the mat refs and when they actually challenge it’s a third party?

Posted
  On 3/10/2025 at 2:20 AM, 1032004 said:

Agree.  Is this same as B10 where when they review it on their own it’s the mat refs and when they actually challenge it’s a third party?

Expand  

Not sure, but it was reviewed twice.

Posted
  On 3/10/2025 at 2:23 AM, Pinnacle said:

Not sure, but it was reviewed twice.

Expand  

Pretty sure it was, in Orine/McGonagle they confirmed it is not the mat refs reviewing the challenges.  Looked like it may have been Gary Kessell.  But yeah, don’t think I’ve ever seen that before - call is made, officials overturn it on their own then challenged and reversed back to original call…

Posted (edited)

Per Intermat Rankings, four (4) Top 10 ranked wrestlers had their Allocation stolen.

#4 Trumble, #5 Norman, #9 Knox, & #10 Moore.  

Is there anything unique about this Qualifier that makes highly ranked wrestlers more susceptible to under-performing ?  Just seems odd.

 

Edited by Show_Me
typo
Posted
  On 3/11/2025 at 9:05 PM, Show_Me said:

Per Intermat Rankings, four (4) Top 10 ranked wrestlers had their Allocation stolen.

#4 Trumble, #5 Norman, #9 Knox, & #10 Moore.  

Is there anything unique about this Qualifier that makes highly ranked wrestlers more susceptible to under-performing ?  Just seems odd.

 

Expand  

Well there’s only 7 teams and 6 of them are pretty good 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...