Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've never seen a score that high before. I remember seeing a 34-6 score at the state tournament back in 1981. Back in those days any win by 12 points or more scored the same as a techfall today and was called a "superior decision", but there was no 15 point "mercy rule" like today. Seems to me if you can rack up 30 points on somebody that you probably could pin him if you wanted. 

Posted
  On 2/2/2025 at 12:08 AM, 666 said:

I've never seen a score that high before. I remember seeing a 34-6 score at the state tournament back in 1981. Back in those days any win by 12 points or more scored the same as a techfall today and was called a "superior decision", but there was no 15 point "mercy rule" like today. Seems to me if you can rack up 30 points on somebody that you probably could pin him if you wanted. 

Expand  

Interesting. 34-6 is pretty steep. I didn't think of there being no mercy rule for high school. I'm sure there were some pretty crazy scores. 

Posted
  On 2/2/2025 at 12:18 AM, WrestlingRecords.com said:

Interesting. 34-6 is pretty steep. I didn't think of there being no mercy rule for high school. I'm sure there were some pretty crazy scores. 

Expand  

I don't even know when techfalls became a thing. Sometime after I was done with my wrestling career. There was no mercy on the mat when I wrestled 😄

  • Haha 1
Posted

No worse than the afore mentioned but Randy lewis beat an Iowa State guy, not jim gibbons, by more than 20 I think, odd match cause he was such a pinner and couldnt shoot without embarassing himself.

"Half measures are a coward's form of insanity."

Posted

I believe the tech fall in folkstyle came about in the 85-86 season, my HS freshman year. I think it was already in freestyle as I remember the 12-point tech fall in middle school (this I'm not positive about, though).  I also remember a one-count exposure for 2 pts in 87-88. It only lasted one year (my jr year). My HS coach taught us the cheap tilt just for that reason. 

  • Bob 1
Posted
  On 2/2/2025 at 12:58 AM, WrestlingRecords.com said:

34-2 is insane. Makes sense Saitiev would have a match up there. 

Expand  

I watched that match live at MSG. Afterward, Satiev climbed up into the stands just a few feet away from me, where the rest of the Russia contingent was. I’ll never forget the smirk on his face as he exchanged glances with his teammates. Left my stomach feeling unsettled. I wouldn’t be surprised if that match was the reason FILA made the tech automatic rather than optional.

Posted
  On 2/3/2025 at 12:50 AM, BAC said:

I watched that match live at MSG. Afterward, Satiev climbed up into the stands just a few feet away from me, where the rest of the Russia contingent was. I’ll never forget the smirk on his face as he exchanged glances with his teammates. Left my stomach feeling unsettled. I wouldn’t be surprised if that match was the reason FILA made the tech automatic rather than optional.

Expand  

That's super cool. You should've shot a double on him. Might've surprised him. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
  On 2/3/2025 at 2:14 AM, WrestlingRecords.com said:

That's super cool. You should've shot a double on him. Might've surprised him. 

Expand  

I wish I had.  I didn't like it at all.  The rules permitted it, but I suspect the reason for and spirit of the rule was to allow wrestlers to go for the pin, a higher team point value than a tech.  Saitiev clearly wasn't going for the pin. Watching the match, it was unclear to me whether he was trying to humiliate the guy or was just using the early-round match to work out the kinks in his own game (which I'd have been OK with), but the post-match smirk told me it was the former. I'm glad they changed the rule.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...