Dinesh D’Souza admits his "film" was full of s---

[Tripnsweep]

58 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Said the 51 intel agents….   Was democracy on the ballot when he was considering pardoning the entire democratic party lol.   Talk about rich white privileged people.   

What in the QAnon is this drivel? Did your AI malfunction?

[Caveira]

2 minutes ago, Tripnsweep said:

What in the QAnon is this drivel? Did your AI malfunction?

Totally bat shyte crazy isn’t it 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c23v824g4v3o.amp

[mspart]

So those that say there are more important things to think about take great exception when it is turned around on them. 

mspart

[Tripnsweep]

On 12/8/2024 at 10:08 AM, Caveira said:

Totally bat shyte crazy isn’t it 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c23v824g4v3o.amp

And this has what to do with D'Souza lying? 

[Caveira]

7 minutes ago, Tripnsweep said:

And this has what to do with D'Souza lying? 

Things that we should care about more than D’Souza for $500 Alex.  

[Tripnsweep]

22 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Things that we should care about more than D’Souza for $500 Alex.  

Because lying to a good portion of the public about something that didn't happen to grift people out of money and perpetuate lies that undermine our country isn't important?

[Caveira]

12 minutes ago, Tripnsweep said:

Because lying to a good portion of the public about something that didn't happen to grift people out of money and perpetuate lies that undermine our country isn't important?

You think it’s more important than Biden considering pardoning most of the folks around him during his administration?

remember.   Y’all said democracy was on the ballot before the election.   Maybe it was.   

[Tripnsweep]

10 minutes ago, Caveira said:

You think it’s more important than Biden considering pardoning most of the folks around him during his administration?

remember.   Y’all said democracy was on the ballot before the election.   Maybe it was.   

Yes. Because what Biden decides or doesn't do is on him. At least him doing that is in response to Trump threatening to prosecute people for bull*I poop my pants, don't laugh at me* because he's angry at them. That makes sense, since we know that Schiff hasn't broken the law. 

[Caveira]

1 hour ago, Tripnsweep said:

Yes. Because what Biden decides or doesn't do is on him. At least him doing that is in response to Trump threatening to prosecute people for bull*I poop my pants, don't laugh at me* because he's angry at them. That makes sense, since we know that Schiff hasn't broken the law. 

How do we know that?   And if so what does he need a pardon for?

[mspart]

I feel a pardon for unknown offenses is offensive. 

Schiff lied to the country as a sitting House representative.   Perhaps no legal action should go against him but in so doing he threatened jail for Trump.  That was the upshot of what Shiff wanted.  

mspart

[Tripnsweep]

12 minutes ago, Caveira said:

How do we know that?   And if so what does he need a pardon for?

To pre empt any kind of bull that Trump may imagine to try to charge him with. Unlike regular people, Trump has no problem making the Justice department his own to settle scores with people he feels slighted him. He has said that is exactly what he will do. 

[mspart]

He said the opposite in his recent interview.

mspart

[Offthemat]

7 minutes ago, mspart said:

He said the opposite in his recent interview.

mspart

Trip has a tendency to project his personality traits to Trump. 

[Tripnsweep]

17 minutes ago, mspart said:

He said the opposite in his recent interview.

mspart

https://www.npr.org/2024/11/14/nx-s1-5183846/trump-presidency-retribution-enemies-threats

[Caveira]

24 minutes ago, Tripnsweep said:

To pre empt any kind of bull that Trump may imagine to try to charge him with. Unlike regular people, Trump has no problem making the Justice department his own to settle scores with people he feels slighted him. He has said that is exactly what he will do. 

Didn’t the Ds just do that to Trump?

[Tripnsweep]

5 hours ago, Caveira said:

Didn’t the Ds just do that to Trump?

The difference was Trump actually committed crimes and was convicted of felony charges. 

[Offthemat]

1 hour ago, Tripnsweep said:

The difference was Trump actually committed crimes and was convicted of felony charges. 

Not a single one of the indictments would stand up under honest scrutiny.  

[Le duke]

Not a single one of the indictments would stand up under honest scrutiny.  

A grand jury and a trial jury disagreed, it seems.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Tripnsweep]

35 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

Not a single one of the indictments would stand up under honest scrutiny.  

A jury of his peers convicted him. 

[Offthemat]

39 minutes ago, Le duke said:

A grand jury and a trial jury disagreed, it seems.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

21 minutes ago, Tripnsweep said:

A jury of his peers convicted him. 

These statements are irrelevant.  Jack Smith has had a case where a grand jury indicted, and a trial jury convicted, only to be overturned by a unanimous Supreme Court.  It’s what he does, prosecute cases that are baseless.  The reason his Florida case was thrown out is because a Supreme Court justice pointed out his deficiency.  The others have similar problems and will be overturned in due time. 

[Tripnsweep]

10 hours ago, Offthemat said:

 

These statements are irrelevant.  Jack Smith has had a case where a grand jury indicted, and a trial jury convicted, only to be overturned by a unanimous Supreme Court.  It’s what he does, prosecute cases that are baseless.  The reason his Florida case was thrown out is because a Supreme Court justice pointed out his deficiency.  The others have similar problems and will be overturned in due time. 

I'm pretty sure Jack Smith hasn't convicted Trump and that conviction wasn't overturned. Unless you live in fantasy land. 

[Offthemat]

2 hours ago, Tripnsweep said:

I'm pretty sure Jack Smith hasn't convicted Trump and that conviction wasn't overturned. Unless you live in fantasy land. 

And he won’t.  Florida has been thrown out and he dropped the DC case due to the Supreme Court’s ruling.  That ruling also went against the business records case that garnered 34 guilty verdicts.  It would have to be retried without presenting the disqualified evidence from the first trial.  
 

The financial fraud case has already been roughed up with appeals judges threatening the prosecution with censure for simply bringing the case.  The E Jean Carrol defamation will go down in a similar fashion when it’s brought in front of a reputable judge.  Big Fanny Willis’ case has been turned on her.  
 

The entirety of the prosecutions was geared to prevent Trump’s election.  It was sanctioned and coordinated by the White House, but it failed because Trump, in every case, acted within the law.  

[Tripnsweep]

22 hours ago, Offthemat said:

And he won’t.  Florida has been thrown out and he dropped the DC case due to the Supreme Court’s ruling.  That ruling also went against the business records case that garnered 34 guilty verdicts.  It would have to be retried without presenting the disqualified evidence from the first trial.  
 

The financial fraud case has already been roughed up with appeals judges threatening the prosecution with censure for simply bringing the case.  The E Jean Carrol defamation will go down in a similar fashion when it’s brought in front of a reputable judge.  Big Fanny Willis’ case has been turned on her.  
 

The entirety of the prosecutions was geared to prevent Trump’s election.  It was sanctioned and coordinated by the White House, but it failed because Trump, in every case, acted within the law.  

The case can continue in 4 years since the long standing policy of the justice department is to not criminally prosecute the current president. 

One of the main reasons Trump ran for president again, besides the grift, was to avoid going to prison or having any consequences for breaking the law. His tactic was to delay, file motions, and slow everything down, on the chance he could win the election and knowing if he did, they couldn't do anything because of long standing policy. If he hadn't won, then he would be looking at possibly going to prison right now. 

[mspart]

On 12/9/2024 at 1:13 PM, Tripnsweep said:

https://www.npr.org/2024/11/14/nx-s1-5183846/trump-presidency-retribution-enemies-threats

Hey Trip, this is all conjecture.   You might want to quote Trump next time. 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-interview-meet-press-kristen-welker-election-president-rcna182857

KRISTEN WELKER: 

You said that on Truth Social, June 12, 2023: “I will appoint a real special prosecutor to go after the most corrupt president in the history of the United States, Joe Biden — 

PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP:

Well, that part is true.

KRISTEN WELKER:

-- and the entire Biden crime family.” Are you going to do that? Are you going to go after Joe Biden?

PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP:

I’m really looking to make our country successful. I’m not looking to go back into the past. I’m looking to make our country successful. Retribution will be through success. If we can make our success — this country successful, that would be my greatest, that would be such a great achievement.

... 

KRISTEN WELKER: 

I want to pause here, because what you’re saying is significant. Because you wrote on Truth 

Social in 2023 that you’re going to appoint a real special prosecutor to go after Joe Biden. Now you’re saying you’re not going to do that.

PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP:

I will say this, no, I’m not doing that unless I find something that I think is reasonable, but that’s not going to be my decision. That’s going to be Pam Bondi’s decision, and, to a different extent, Kash Patel, assuming they’re both there, and I think they’re both going to get approved. But I — I — you know, while you ask me that, what they’ve done to me with weaponization is a disgrace. 

... 

KRISTEN WELKER: 

Do — Pam Bondi talks about investigating the investigators. Do you want her to investigate Jack Smith based --

PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP:

I want her to do what she wants to do. 

KRISTEN WELKER: 

-- do you want to see Jack Smith investigated?

PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP:

Well, I think he’s very corrupt, but I want her to do whatever she — 

KRISTEN WELKER: 

Are you going to direct her -- 

PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP:

No, I’m not, I’m not 

KRISTEN WELKER: 

-- to prosecute Jack Smith? 

PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP:

She’s a very smart person. She’s — She was a great attorney general in Florida. She’s very experienced. I want her to do what she wants to do. I’m not going to instruct her to do it, no.

I bolded the important parts. 

mspart

[Tripnsweep]

I don't know if you're aware of this but Trump has a tendency to lie when people question him about things he says to rile up his cult members.